Report Interpretation
Covering the latest research from top Wall Street investment banks
Report InterpretationHilo Research

China residential property market Report Interpretation

Goldman Sachs estimates that the 70-city primary-market price decline narrowed to 0.8% month-on-month annualized in July, with Tier-1 and Tier-2 cities recording sequential gains. Secondary-home prices deteriorated sequentially, underscoring an uneven property-market recovery.

InstitutionGoldman Sachs
Date20260817
IndustryChina residential property market

Summary

Goldman Sachs estimates that the 70-city primary-market price decline narrowed to 0.8% month-on-month annualized in July, with Tier-1 and Tier-2 cities recording sequential gains. Secondary-home prices deteriorated sequentially, underscoring an uneven property-market recovery.

China property70-city pricesprimary marketsecondary marketTier-1 citiesTier-2 citieshousing inventory
  • Primary-market weighted average prices fell 0.8% month-on-month annualized in July, versus a 1.0% decline in June.
  • Tier-1 prices rose 1.3% month-on-month annualized and Tier-2 prices turned slightly positive.
  • Secondary-market prices fell 1.9% month-on-month annualized, worsening from a 1.4% decline in June.
  • Major-city inventory declined to 27.1 months in July from 27.5 months in June.

Report Interpretation

Overview

This macro update reviews July price and activity indicators for China’s 70-city residential property market. Goldman Sachs sees some improvement in new-home pricing, particularly in higher-tier cities, but continued and sequentially worsening weakness in the secondary market.

Core views

Goldman Sachs estimates that the population-weighted average price of new homes across the NBS 70-city sample fell 0.8% month-on-month annualized after seasonal adjustment in July, an improvement from a 1.0% decline in June. The year-on-year decline also narrowed modestly, to 3.2% from 3.3%. Shanghai, Hangzhou and Hefei continued to post year-on-year gains of 3.0%, 2.6% and 0.3%, respectively. The report cautions that new-home prices tend to be less volatile because of local-government price management, so primary-market data should not be read as a complete picture of housing-market conditions. The improvement in new-home prices was concentrated in higher-tier cities. Tier-1 prices rose 1.3% month-on-month annualized in July, although this was slower than the 1.8% gain in June; Shenzhen led the Tier-1 gains. Tier-2 prices returned to positive growth, rising 0.1% after a 0.3% decline in June. Tier-3 prices remained under pressure but their decline narrowed to 2.8% from 3.1%. Despite these tier-level improvements, the share of cities recording sequential price increases fell in both the primary and secondary markets during July. Secondary-market indicators were weaker. Goldman Sachs estimates that the 70-city weighted average secondary-home price fell 1.9% month-on-month annualized in July, compared with a 1.4% decline in June, while the year-on-year decline was 5.1% versus 5.5% in June. NBS and available third-party series indicated secondary-market price declines of 5–8% over the past year. This contrast with the primary market is central to the report’s assessment: new-home price pressure eased, but resale-market conditions remained materially soft. Activity and inventory data provided a mixed additional signal. Goldman Sachs’ high-frequency tracker showed 30-city new-home transaction volume below year-ago levels in mid-August, potentially owing to typhoon and flooding disruptions. Meanwhile, sellable inventory in major cities, measured as sellable gross floor area divided by trailing 12-month gross floor area sold, fell to 27.1 months in July from 27.5 months in June. The reduction was led mainly by Tier-2 cities, indicating some inventory improvement even as transaction conditions remained weak.

Analysis framework

The report uses NBS 70-city price data, calculates population-weighted averages rather than simple city averages, and applies Goldman Sachs seasonal adjustments to sequential changes. It compares primary and secondary markets, breaks results down by city tier, and cross-checks prices with high-frequency transaction and inventory indicators.

Methodology notes

  • Industry Analysis

    Population-weighted, seasonally adjusted housing-price tracking by market and city tier

    Goldman Sachs weights the 70-city data by population and seasonally adjusts month-to-month changes, then compares new-home and resale-market pricing across Tier-1, Tier-2 and Tier-3 cities.

  • Industry AnalysisSupply-demand framework

    Inventory-months measure

    The report defines inventory months as sellable gross floor area divided by the trailing 12-month gross floor area sold, using the change in this ratio to assess housing supply relative to sales.

Key data

  • 70-city primary-market price change-0.8% mom annualized; -3.2% yoyJuly, seasonally adjusted by Goldman Sachs; versus -1.0% mom annualized and -3.3% yoy in June.
  • 70-city secondary-market price change-1.9% mom annualized; -5.1% yoyJuly, seasonally adjusted by Goldman Sachs; versus -1.4% mom annualized and -5.5% yoy in June.
  • Tier-1 primary-home price change+1.3% mom annualizedJuly; slower than +1.8% in June.
  • Tier-2 primary-home price change+0.1% mom annualizedJuly; turned positive from -0.3% in June.
  • Tier-3 primary-home price change-2.8% mom annualizedJuly; decline narrowed from -3.1% in June.
  • Major-city inventory months27.1 monthsJuly, down from 27.5 months in June, mostly led by Tier-2 cities.

Impact & implications

The report portrays an uneven housing backdrop: primary-market price declines moderated and higher-tier cities improved, but resale prices weakened sequentially and mid-August new-home transactions were below year-ago levels. Falling inventory provides a partial offset, especially in Tier-2 cities.

What to watch

  • Whether new-home transaction volumes recover after the reported typhoon and flooding disruptions.
  • Whether the decline in major-city inventory months continues, particularly in Tier-2 cities.
  • Whether secondary-market price declines stabilize after worsening sequentially in July.
Zhejiang ICP No. 2022035445-5
Disclaimer: Market data, charts, indicators, research views, and other information provided on this website are intended solely for information display, research communication, and educational reference. They should not be regarded as personalized investment advice, securities recommendations, trading instructions, solicitations, or guarantees of return. While we strive to improve the reliability of our data and content, such information may still be subject to delays, errors, incompleteness, or untimely updates due to source differences, methodological limitations, system processing, or market volatility. Users should exercise independent judgment based on their own circumstances and bear all risks and responsibilities arising from the use of this website.

Settings

Sign in to view recent logins