Quick Summary
Covering the latest research from top Wall Street investment banks

China’s Exports May Deliver a 'Selective Win,' but unlikely to repeat the broad export boom of the pandemic period

Institution
Morgan Stanley
Date
2026-04-18
Authors
Robin Xing, Jenny Zheng, CFA, Zhipeng Cai, Harry Zhao
Company
-
Ticker
-
Industry
Macro Research / China Exports / Green Technology
Rating
-
NeutralLow confidenceThe report argues that Middle East conflict may help China gain export share in green technology and related capital goods, but weaker global demand, higher energy costs, and deteriorating terms of trade will limit macroeconomic benefits.
AuthorsRobin Xing, Jenny Zheng, CFA, Zhipeng Cai, Harry Zhao
CoverageOther
Business segmentsNew Big Three Industries、Green Technology、New Energy Vehicles、Solar Panels、Batteries、Non-ferrous Metals、High-tech Manufacturing、Energy and Refining、Consumer Goods、Medical Supplies、Electronics
Research firm divisions/subsidiariesMorgan Stanley(Other)、Morgan Stanley Asia Co., Ltd.(Other)

AI summary card

China’s Exports May Deliver a 'Selective Win,' but unlikely to repeat the broad export boom of the pandemic period

Morgan Stanley believes that Middle East instability may increase China’s share in the New Big Three Industries and green capital goods exports, but weak global demand and the energy cost shock will limit broader demand improvement.

This is a macro and industry theme report and does not provide stock ratings, target prices, or current prices.
China ExportsNew Big Three IndustriesGreen TechnologyNew Energy VehiclesSolar CellsBatteriesEnergy ShockTerms of TradeRe-inflation
  • During the pandemic, China’s global export share rose by about 2 percentage points, mainly due to earlier resumption of activity, recovery of industrial capacity, and a global shift in commodity demand toward electronics, medical, and home-related products.
  • This round of opportunity is more concentrated in areas tied to energy security, electrification, and supply-chain resilience; if the Q1 2026 trend continues, the New Big Three Industries may contribute about 0.3 percentage points to export-share gains.
  • The report estimates that fully offsetting the impact of weakening external demand and worsening terms of trade on final demand may require about a 0.9 percentage-point increase in export share.
  • In a reasonable scenario, the plausible range of China’s export-share gain is about 0.3 to 0.9 percentage points, indicating limited and selective growth rather than pandemic-style broad expansion.
  • Higher energy prices could push up PPI and CPI and stabilize inflation expectations, but they would compress margins in downstream industries, especially those with weaker pricing power.

Report interpretation

Overview

The report discusses whether China can once again reclaim global export market share to the extent seen during COVID under the backdrop of rising geopolitical tension in the Middle East. Its core conclusion is that China may achieve selective wins in green technology, new energy vehicles, batteries, solar panels, and related capital goods, but this time weaker global demand, higher energy prices, and poorer terms of trade mean the lift to aggregate demand and economic growth from higher export share will be clearly limited.

Core views

First, China's export-share increase during the pandemic was supported by a dual thrust of supply recovery and demand structure, with global export share up about 2 percentage points in 2020. Second, opportunities from the current Middle East conflict are more concentrated in sectors linked to energy security, electrification, and supply-chain resilience, especially the New Big Three Industries. Third, higher energy prices act like a tax on global real income, weakening household consumption, corporate profits, and investment appetite. Fourth, as a net energy importer, China’s energy import gap amounted to about 1.8% of GDP in 2025, and deteriorating terms of trade undermine real income. Fifth, even if export volumes or market share rise in some sectors, improvement in macro-level final demand may still be limited.

Analysis framework

The report revisits changes in China’s export share during the pandemic, compares the supply recovery, global demand structure, and sector contributions at that time, and contrasts these with the current energy-supply shock triggered by the Middle East conflict. The analysis focuses on sectors that could raise China’s export share, the offsetting effect of the decline in global trade volumes, the impact of energy prices on margins and inflation, and signs of sectoral rebalancing reflected in export prices and profit data for green products.

Methodology notes

  • Macro Scenario AnalysisExport Market Share Stress Test

    Whether export-share gains can offset external-demand and terms-of-trade shocks

    The report estimates that to bring final demand back to pre-shock levels, China may need roughly a 0.9 percentage-point increase in global export share, while a lower-case estimate based on the direct contribution from the New Big Three Industries is around 0.3 percentage points.

  • Historical ComparisonReview of Export Share Changes During the Pandemic

    Resonance between supply recovery and demand structure

    In 2020, China regained pandemic control earlier and restored industrial production, filling supply gaps when other exporters were constrained, while global commodity demand tilted toward electronics, medical supplies, and home-related goods, driving broad export-share gains.

  • Sector Structure AnalysisNew Big Three Industries and Green Transition Demand

    Selective export opportunities driven by structural demand

    Greater demand for energy security, electrification, and supply-chain resilience supports demand for new energy vehicles, solar panels, batteries, and related capital goods—areas where China has scale, cost, and supply-chain advantages.

  • Price and Margin AnalysisRe-inflation and Pricing Power Monitoring

    Export demand, price bottoms, and industrial margin improvement

    Using trade prices, industrial profits, and green-product export prices, the report concludes that pricing power in some high-demand sectors appears to be recovering, but the energy shock is more a price-level shock than one conducive to sustainable price growth.

Asset mapping & comparison

Structured mapping from thesis to named assets (strengths, weaknesses, peers, risks).

  • China Macroeconomy
    Affected jointly by export share, energy prices, and global demand
    Strengths
    Green technology and related capital goods exports have scale, cost, and supply-chain advantages.
    Weaknesses
    Slowing global demand and rising energy import costs will weaken final demand.
    Comparison
    Compared with broad export-share gains during the pandemic, this round is more selective and structural.
    Risks
    If global trade volume continues to shrink or energy prices stay elevated, the growth boost from export-share gains to growth could be offset.
  • New Energy Vehicles, Batteries, and Solar Industry Chain
    Directly benefits from demand for electrification, energy security, and green transition
    Strengths
    Export growth is strong, and some price indicators show bottoming and/or recovery signs.
    Weaknesses
    Historically high overcapacity keeps margin and price recovery dependent on external demand.
    Comparison
    Compared with traditional manufacturing, these industries are more likely to be the main source of export-share gains this cycle.
    Risks
    Lower-than-expected global demand, trade frictions, price competition, and excess capacity could weaken profit recovery.
  • Energy and Refining-related Industries
    Clearly affected by oil prices and energy-supply shocks
    Strengths
    Rising energy prices may support nominal prices and inflation expectations.
    Weaknesses
    Domestic crude distillation utilization has fallen to near pandemic-era levels, pressuring refining margins.
    Comparison
    Upstream energy-price shocks are more unfavorable to downstream sectors, unlike the environment in which pandemic-era commodity-demand expansion dominated.
    Risks
    Further increases in energy costs could compress downstream margins and suppress investment.
  • Non-ferrous Metals and High-tech Manufacturing
    Driven by global demand structure and the green transition
    Strengths
    The report notes improving pricing power and profitability in these high-demand sectors.
    Weaknesses
    Improvement still depends on demand durability and the ability to pass through costs.
    Comparison
    Compared with weaker-pricing power downstream sectors, these sectors are more likely to benefit from structural demand.
    Risks
    If external demand weakens or energy costs cannot be fully passed on, profit normalization may slow.

Key data

  • Increase in China’s Global Export Share in 2020about 2 percentage pointsDuring the pandemic, China resumed production earlier and benefited from shifts in global commodity demand structure.
  • Potential Export-Share Contribution from the New Big Three Industriesabout 0.3 percentage pointsIf strong growth momentum from Q1 2026 were to persist, related industries could deliver gains of this magnitude.
  • Export-Share Increase Needed to Offset the Shockabout 0.9 percentage pointsThe report roughly estimates that a larger share increase is needed for final demand to return to pre-shock levels.
  • Plausible Range of Export-Share Improvement0.3 to 0.9 percentage pointsThe report believes the actual outcome is likely to lie in this range, below the broad increase seen during the pandemic.
  • China’s Energy Import Gapabout 1.8% of GDP in 2025As a net energy importer, China faces pressure from worsening terms of trade and rising production costs.
  • 2026 Jan-Feb Growth Rate of Green Product Exports55%The report says green product export growth rose from 26% in 2025 to 55% in Jan-Feb 2026.

Impact & implications

For investment and macro assessment, the report implies that export improvement is more likely to appear in structural areas such as green technology, new energy vehicles, batteries, solar, and selected high-tech manufacturing, rather than in broadly improved overall exports. The energy shock may lift inflation readings and ease some deflationary pressure, but it will also compress downstream margins and global demand. Therefore, higher Chinese export share can cushion external shocks, but is unlikely to fully offset weak demand and worsening terms of trade.

Risks

  • Falling total global demand, which would shrink the size of the export market.
  • Rising energy prices worsening China’s terms of trade and weakening real income.
  • As a net energy importer, China faces pressure on production costs and downstream margins.
  • Sectors with weaker pricing power downstream may struggle to pass through higher costs.
  • If the New Big Three Industries continue to face overcapacity and price competition, stronger exports may not translate into margin improvement.
  • Trade frictions, geopolitical escalation, or supply-chain constraints could cap export-share gains.

What to watch

  • Whether strong momentum in green-product export growth in Jan-Feb can continue in subsequent months.
  • Whether export prices for new energy vehicles, solar cells, and lithium-ion batteries keep showing a durable bottom-and-recovery pattern.
  • Whether China’s share of global export markets can approach the 0.9 percentage-point threshold needed to offset shocks.
  • Changes in global energy prices, crude distillation utilization, and downstream sector margins.
  • Whether PPI, CPI, industrial profits, and trade-price data confirm the re-inflation trend.
  • The ongoing impact of the Middle East conflict on global trade volumes, household consumption, and corporate investment appetite.
Zhejiang ICP No. 2022035445-5
Disclaimer: Market data, charts, indicators, research views, and other information provided on this website are intended solely for information display, research communication, and educational reference. They should not be regarded as personalized investment advice, securities recommendations, trading instructions, solicitations, or guarantees of return. While we strive to improve the reliability of our data and content, such information may still be subject to delays, errors, incompleteness, or untimely updates due to source differences, methodological limitations, system processing, or market volatility. Users should exercise independent judgment based on their own circumstances and bear all risks and responsibilities arising from the use of this website.

Settings

Sign in to view recent logins