Quick Summary
Covering the latest research from top Wall Street investment banks

JPMorgan Raises TSMC's CoWoS Forecast, Bullish on Structural Storage Shortage

Institution
JPMorgan
Date
20260518
Authors
Mio Shikanai, Jay Kwon, Gokul Hariharan, Sangsik Lee, William Yang
Company
Kioxia Holdings, Samsung Electronics, TSMC, Advanced Micro Devices, ISU Petasys, Hanmi Semiconductor, Silergy
Ticker
285A, 005930, TSM, AMD, 6415TT, HANMISEMI, SILERGY
Industry
Semiconductors, Silver, Artificial Intelligence, DRAM, NAND, SSD, Augmented Reality, IT Services, Consumer Electronics, Computer Hardware
Rating
Kioxia OW, Samsung Electronics OW, TSMC OW, ISU Petasys OW, Silergy OW, Hanmi Semi UW
BullishHigh confidenceReiterateMedium-termThe report maintains Overweight (OW) ratings on Kioxia and TSMC while raising target prices, driven by structural storage shortages and strong demand for advanced packaging under AI tailwinds, reflecting an overall optimistic tone.
AuthorsMio Shikanai, Jay Kwon, Gokul Hariharan, Sangsik Lee, William Yang
Target priceKioxia ¥80,000, Samsung Electronics ₩480,000, TSMC NT$2,500, ISU Petasys ₩185,000, Hanmi Semi ₩150,000, Silergy NT$520
CoverageChina、United States、Japan、South Korea、Asia-Pacific

AI summary card

JPMorgan Raises TSMC's CoWoS Forecast, Bullish on Structural Storage Shortage

The report highlights Kioxia’s better-than-expected earnings and raises Samsung Electronics’ target price, while significantly increasing TSMC’s CoWoS capacity forecasts for 2026/27, arguing that AI-driven demand is shifting the semiconductor industry from cyclical to structural growth in both advanced packaging and memory sectors.

Kioxia/TSMC/Samsung Electronics all maintained at Overweight (OW)
SemiconductorsAIAdvanced PackagingCoWoSMemoryNANDDRAMTSMCKioxiaSamsung Electronics
  • Kioxia reports Q4 FY26 operating profit of JPY 596.8 billion, exceeding expectations; guides F1Q27 at JPY 1.3 trillion
  • Raises Samsung Electronics’ target price to ₩480,000; FY26–28 EPS estimates increased by 1–5%
  • Significantly raises TSMC’s CoWoS capacity forecasts: 115k wpm by end-2026, 175k wpm by end-2027, and 220k wpm by end-2028
  • SoIC packaging ramps up strongly in H2 2027, reaching 40k/65k wpm by end-2027/28
  • Key CoWoS demand drivers include AMD, AWS/Alchip, Broadcom, MediaTek, and NVIDIA
  • ISU Petasys increases multilayer board capacity by ~20%; FY27–28 EPS raised by 9%
  • Hanmi Semi’s Q1 results below expectations due to a TCB sales gap
  • Silergy successfully implements price hikes; data center revenue share rises to 15%

Report interpretation

Overview

This JPMorgan Asia-Pacific technology sector report focuses on three core companies—Japan’s Kioxia Holdings, Korea’s Samsung Electronics, and Taiwan’s TSMC—while also covering supply chain participants such as ISU Petasys, Hanmi Semi, and Silergy. The central thesis is that AI compute demand is transforming the semiconductor industry from cyclical volatility toward structural growth, with long-term agreements (LTAs) in memory and advanced packaging capacity expansion serving as key focal points. The report upgrades earnings forecasts and target prices for multiple companies.

Core views

Memory Sector: The report argues Kioxia stands at a pivotal structural inflection point. Kioxia reported Q4 FY26 operating profit of JPY 596.8 billion, surpassing buy-side expectations of JPY 579.2 billion, and guided F1Q27 operating profit at JPY 1.3 trillion—significantly above investor survey expectations. The company demonstrates the industry’s highest margins, technical execution capability, and supply discipline. Its FY3/27 capex guidance of JPY 450 billion is higher than the buy-side expectation of JPY 425 billion (note: this reflects disciplined expansion rather than aggressive scaling). Analysts Mio Shikanai and Jay Kwon believe the memory sector is heading toward a structural shortage, based on two key factors: strong demand for enterprise SSDs (eSSDs) driven by agentic AI, and industry-wide capital expenditure discipline limiting supply. They expect Kioxia’s ongoing LTA negotiations with major customers to yield favorable outcomes—specifically variable pricing and volume contracts designed to capture upside potential, a model already adopted by peers. Samsung Electronics, as the world’s largest NAND supplier, will similarly benefit from this structural trend. The report raises Samsung’s FY26–28 EPS estimates by 1–5% and lifts its target price to ₩480,000. However, a potential labor strike on May 21—expected to last 18 days—could temporarily reduce operating profit by 6–10%. Advanced Packaging: On TSMC, Gokul Hariharan significantly raises FY26/27 CoWoS capacity forecasts. The latest projections are 115k wpm by end-2026, 175k wpm by end-2027, and 220k wpm by end-2028. This revision stems from two factors: accelerated internal capacity ramp-up at TSMC and greater utilization of OSAT (outsourced assembly and test) partners like ASE (Advanced Semiconductor Engineering) and VIS (Vanguard International Semiconductor). SoIC (System-on-Integrated-Chips) packaging is expected to ramp strongly from H2 2027, reaching 40k wpm by end-2027 and 65k wpm by end-2028, primarily driven by ASIC, NVIDIA, and CPO (co-packaged optics) projects. The report specifically notes Vanguard Semi (VIS) as an overlooked CoWoS interposer supplier. Demand Side: AMD represents a significant incremental driver for CoWoS, utilizing N4 CPU and N2 GPU capacity. AWS/Alchip could see substantial upside if granted additional N3 capacity. Broadcom and MediaTek benefit from TPU (Tensor Processing Unit) ramps. NVIDIA’s Blackwell Spectrum X and Vera CPU contribute modest incremental demand. Additionally, Groq is expected to enter TSMC’s N3 node by end-2027, with its CPU and LPU (Learning Processing Unit) becoming new CoWoS demand drivers.

Analysis framework

The report employs a 'top-down validation + bottom-up fine-tuning' analytical framework. It begins with the macro trend of surging AI compute demand to validate its impact on memory and advanced packaging, then uses supply chain checks and earnings data to verify specific companies’ capacity, pricing, and order dynamics. In memory analysis, the team applies a 'cyclical vs. structural' comparison framework—contrasting historical memory cycles characterized by high volatility against today’s AI-driven demand structure—to assess whether the industry is undergoing a paradigm shift. Key validation points include LTA negotiation progress, capex discipline, and eSSD adoption in AI workloads. For advanced packaging, the team uses a 'capacity-demand matching' model: first estimating CoWoS/SoIC demand curves based on product roadmaps and order forecasts from downstream clients (AMD, NVIDIA, AWS, Broadcom, etc.), then comparing these against TSMC’s and its OSAT partners’ capacity plans to identify timing of supply-demand gaps or surpluses, thereby pinpointing investment opportunities in equipment and materials suppliers.

Methodology notes

  • Industry/Sector Analysis FrameworkSupply-demand framework

    Supply-Demand Framework

    The report centers on matching supply-side factors (capacity, capex, technology roadmap) with demand-side drivers (AI servers, cloud computing, enterprise SSDs) in memory and advanced packaging. By assessing the direction and magnitude of supply-demand gaps, it forecasts pricing trends and earnings elasticity.

  • Cycle and Sentiment FrameworkInflection Point Analysis

    Cyclical vs. Structural Inflection Assessment

    The report explicitly evaluates whether the memory industry is transitioning from 'cyclical' to 'structural' growth—a classic semiconductor framework. Cyclical implies high price volatility and short investment windows; structural suggests elevated demand ceilings and improved long-term returns. The firm validates this shift through LTA progress and AI demand sustainability.

  • Valuation MethodPE/PEG valuation

    Target Price and EPS Co-Adjustment

    When raising target prices, the report simultaneously revises EPS forecasts for the next 2–3 years, reflecting how improved earnings expectations drive valuation under a PE framework—as seen with Samsung Electronics’ 1–5% EPS upgrade leading to a higher target price.

Asset mapping & comparison

Structured mapping from thesis to named assets (strengths, weaknesses, peers, risks).

  • Kioxia Holdings (285A.T)
    NAND leader; direct beneficiary of AI eSSD demand; likely to secure favorable LTA terms
    Strengths
    Highest industry margins, strong technical execution, strict supply discipline
    Comparison
    Samsung is also a NAND giant, but Kioxia leads in eSSD technology
    Risks
    LTA outcomes below expectations, AI demand slowdown
  • Samsung Electronics (005930.KS)
    World’s largest NAND supplier; benefits from structural memory shortage
    Strengths
    Scale advantage, strong vertical integration
    Weaknesses
    Near-term labor strike risk (May 21, expected 18 days)
    Comparison
    Compared to Kioxia, Samsung has higher DRAM exposure and leads in NAND market share
    Risks
    6–10% operating profit impact from strike, prolonged labor negotiations
  • TSMC (TSM)
    Core supplier of advanced packaging (CoWoS/SoIC); irreplaceable in AI chip manufacturing
    Strengths
    Technology leadership, aggressive capacity expansion (>80% CAGR), comprehensive client coverage
    Comparison
    Faces virtually no peer-scale competition in CoWoS; OSAT partners supplement capacity
    Risks
    Capacity ramp delays, fluctuations in downstream AI chip demand
  • AMD
    Significant incremental CoWoS demand driver via N4 CPU and N2 GPU capacity
    Strengths
    Strong MI450 and Venice product pipelines
    Comparison
    Differentiated vs. NVIDIA with combined CPU+GPU solutions
    Risks
    Production ramp delays, market share competition
  • Vanguard Semi (VIS)
    Overlooked CoWoS interposer supplier
    Strengths
    Interposer supply opportunity; low market attention
    Weaknesses
    Small scale, limited capacity
    Comparison
    Plays a supplementary role vs. TSMC’s in-house interposer production
    Risks
    Technical certification delays, capacity expansion constraints
  • ISU Petasys
    Multilayer PCB supplier benefiting from AI server and TPU demand
    Strengths
    20% capacity increase, smooth TPUv8 certification, rising ASPs
    Weaknesses
    FY26/27 market share expected to decline to 21–23%
    Comparison
    Holds technological and customer advantages in multilayer PCB segment
    Risks
    Market share erosion, customer concentration
  • Hanmi Semi
    TCB (Thermo-Compression Bonding) equipment supplier; short-term impact from HBM4 delay
    Strengths
    Order backlog rebounded in January; expected revenue conversion in Q2–Q3
    Weaknesses
    Q1 results below expectations; FY26 orders cut
    Comparison
    More severely impacted by HBM4 certification delays than peers
    Risks
    HBM4 certification delays, further order reductions
  • Silergy (6415.TT)
    PMIC supplier benefiting from server and automotive demand
    Strengths
    Successful price increases, data center revenue share rapidly rising to 15%, FY26 growth of 20–30%
    Comparison
    Dual drivers of pricing power and demand growth in PMIC segment
    Risks
    Gross margin improvement below expectations, inventory write-downs

Key data

  • Kioxia Q4 FY26 Operating ProfitJPY 596.8 billionExceeded buy-side expectation of JPY 579.2 billion
  • Kioxia F1Q27 Operating Profit GuidanceJPY 1.3 trillionAbove investor survey expectations
  • Kioxia FY3/27 Capex GuidanceJPY 450 billionHigher than buy-side expectation of JPY 425 billion, indicating disciplined expansion
  • Samsung Electronics FY26–28 EPS RevisionRaised by 1–5%Reflects improved memory pricing outlook
  • TSMC CoWoS Capacity Forecast (End-2026/27/28)115k/175k/220k wpmSignificantly raised from prior estimates, implying >80% CAGR
  • TSMC SoIC Capacity Forecast (End-2027/28)40k/65k wpm3D packaging accelerates in H2 2027
  • Impact of Samsung Labor Strike-6% to -10% Operating ProfitIf 18-day strike begins May 21
  • ISU Petasys Multilayer Board Capacity Increase~20%Achieved by converting existing VIPPO capacity
  • ISU Petasys FY27–28 EPS RevisionRaised by 9%Driven by multilayer board expansion and ASP improvement
  • Silergy Data Center Revenue Share15%Q1 figure; was single-digit in FY25

Impact & implications

The report contends that AI compute demand is moving from 'thematic hype' to 'earnings realization,' with memory and advanced packaging as the most direct beneficiaries. Kioxia’s earnings beat and supply discipline, along with TSMC’s aggressive CoWoS capacity upgrades, confirm this trend. Investors should watch two key validation points: Kioxia’s analyst day in June for details on shareholder returns and LTA terms, and actual capacity ramp progress at TSMC and its OSAT partners. While Samsung’s labor dispute poses a near-term disruption, its resolution could act as a 'market-clearing event,' ultimately reducing uncertainty.

Risks

  • Samsung Electronics’ May 21 labor strike may last 18 days, potentially reducing operating profit by 6–10%
  • Long-term memory agreement (LTA) negotiations yield subpar outcomes
  • AI compute demand growth slows or falls short of expectations
  • TSMC’s CoWoS/SoIC capacity ramp lags schedule
  • Hanmi Semi faces order cuts due to HBM4 certification delays
  • Geopolitical risks disrupting semiconductor supply chains

What to watch

  • Kioxia Analyst Day in June: shareholder return plans and LTA details
  • Samsung Electronics labor negotiations and potential strike impact
  • TSMC’s actual CoWoS capacity build-out and customer qualification progress
  • SoIC packaging ramp acceleration in H2 2027
  • AMD MI450 and Venice product mass production timeline
  • AWS/Alchip progress in securing additional N3 capacity
Zhejiang ICP No. 2022035445-5
Disclaimer: Market data, charts, indicators, research views, and other information provided on this website are intended solely for information display, research communication, and educational reference. They should not be regarded as personalized investment advice, securities recommendations, trading instructions, solicitations, or guarantees of return. While we strive to improve the reliability of our data and content, such information may still be subject to delays, errors, incompleteness, or untimely updates due to source differences, methodological limitations, system processing, or market volatility. Users should exercise independent judgment based on their own circumstances and bear all risks and responsibilities arising from the use of this website.

Settings

Sign in to view recent logins