Quick Summary
Covering the latest research from top Wall Street investment banks

European consumer acceptance of Chinese cars is rising, but localized dealerships and residual-value management remain the key to breaking through

Institution
Bernstein
Date
2026-04-08
Authors
Stephen Reitman, Harry Martin, CFA
Company
-
Ticker
-
Industry
Global autos; Electric vehicles
Rating
-
NeutralLow confidenceEuropean consumers' willingness to consider Chinese cars has clearly increased, with BYD, Geely, and Xiaomi having advantages in overseas expansion or brand awareness; however, residual value, dealer systems, after-sales service, quality trust, and data security remain key constraints.
AuthorsStephen Reitman, Harry Martin, CFA
CoverageEurope
Asset classesEquity
Business segmentscomplete vehicles、new energy vehicles、electric vehicles、hybrid vehicles、dealer network、fleet customers
Research firm divisions/subsidiariesBernstein(Other)

AI summary card

European consumer acceptance of Chinese cars is rising, but localized dealerships and residual-value management remain the key to breaking through

Bernstein webinar notes show the share of European consumers willing to consider buying Chinese cars has risen to 55%, BYD has leading brand recognition, and Xiaomi has a potential expansion foundation, but Chinese OEMs still need to address quality trust, after-sales networks, residual values, and dealer-partnering issues.

Constructive at the industry level; the report says BYD and Geely benefit more from overseas EV/hybrid expansion, Xiaomi is rated Outperform, XPeng, Li Auto, and NIO are Market-Perform, and Great Wall, GAC, and SAIC are Market-Perform.
Global autosChinese car expansionEuropean marketElectric vehiclesBYDXiaomidealer networkresidual value management
  • European consumer interest in Chinese cars rose from 43% in Oct 2023 to 55% in Dec 2025, and the share explicitly saying they would buy rose from 6% to 13%.
  • BYD’s brand awareness among European consumers reached 52%, significantly ahead of most Chinese brands; although Xiaomi has not yet sold EVs in Europe, its brand awareness already stands at 39%.
  • Price and value for money remain major drivers attracting European consumers to Chinese cars, but quality is becoming more important; quality concerns remain one of the largest barriers.
  • For Chinese OEMs to scale in Europe, gaps in residual-value management, dealer cooperation, after-sales support, and local commercial terms must be filled; simply replicating Chinese contract models has limited impact.
  • Traditional European OEMs still have room to defend, especially benefiting from existing brand, channel, and after-sales networks, and from low-priced EV launches in 2026-2027.

Report interpretation

Overview

This report is Bernstein’s webinar note on whether Europeans are ready to accept Chinese cars, with Georg Mrusek, a partner at Horváth & Partner, as the speaker. It draws on his survey of more than 4,400 consumers and his consulting experience with Chinese OEMs, with core focus on opportunities, consumer acceptance, brand awareness, purchase drivers, barriers, and local channel requirements for Chinese brands’ rapid expansion in Europe.

Core views

The key conclusion is that European consumer acceptance of Chinese cars is improving materially, but this does not mean Chinese brands already have frictionless expansion capability. On the demand side, the share willing to consider Chinese cars rose to 55%, while the share rejecting them fell from 46% two years ago to 21%; by country, Spain and Hungary are the most open, while Austria and Sweden show higher resistance. On the brand side, BYD has built a clear awareness lead, and Xiaomi has a strong awareness base supported by its consumer electronics ecosystem. On the commercial side, Chinese OEMs still need to solve residual-value management, dealer confidence, after-sales networks, localized contracts, and fleet-customer structure issues. For European OEMs, the survey also offers some hope: consumers do not broadly view Chinese cars as clearly superior in technology or quality, and European manufacturers can still defend their mid-term position through brand strength, channels, after-sales support, and the launch of more affordable EVs in 2026-2027.

Analysis framework

The report uses a webinar-minute format, combining consumer survey results, brand awareness data, purchase drivers and blockers, dealer and residual-value management experience, and investment implications across companies. The analysis focus is not on a single company profit model, but on evaluating Chinese OEM expansion readiness in Europe across four dimensions: demand-side acceptance, brand funnel, channel execution, and competitive landscape.

Methodology notes

  • Consumer surveyEuropean consumer purchase-intention survey

    Over 4,400 consumer respondents

    The report cites Horváth & Partner’s latest survey tracking whether European consumers are willing to consider buying Chinese cars, country-level openness, purchase drivers, and key concerns.

  • Brand analysisBrand awareness comparison

    Differences in awareness of Chinese automakers in Europe

    By comparing awareness differences among BYD, Xiaomi, Polestar, MG, and other Chinese brands, the report assesses first-mover advantages and long-tail pressure when entering Europe.

  • Channels and residual valueEuropean dealer localization framework

    Residual value management, dealer confidence, and after-sales network

    The report emphasizes that Chinese OEMs cannot simply copy China-market contract models and must adapt to European dealer commercial practices, integrate with existing systems, and offer commercially attractive terms.

Asset mapping & comparison

Structured mapping from thesis to named assets (strengths, weaknesses, peers, risks).

  • BYD
    Chinese OEM; clear leader in European brand awareness; beneficiary of overseas EV expansion
    Strengths
    High brand awareness, clear price and value advantage, and relatively high residual margin potential in overseas EV sales.
    Weaknesses
    Still needs to improve dealer presence, after-sales support, and residual-value management capability in Europe.
    Comparison
    Compared with most Chinese brands, BYD has a clear lead in European consumer awareness.
    Risks
    European tariffs, minimum import price policies, residual-value pressure, quality trust concerns, and data security issues.
  • Geely
    Chinese OEM; beneficiary of export scale and HEV strategy
    Strengths
    Expanding from a lower export base and accelerating its HEV product strategy.
    Weaknesses
    European consumer awareness and channel foundation still need continued build-out.
    Comparison
    The report highlights Geely as one of the better Chinese auto beneficiaries alongside BYD.
    Risks
    Intensifying European competition, execution risk in localization channels, residual value, and insufficient brand awareness.
  • Xiaomi
    Potential European EV entrant; Bernstein rating is Outperform
    Strengths
    Has 39% European consumer awareness despite not yet selling EVs, and its consumer electronics ecosystem supports brand introduction.
    Weaknesses
    European EV sales have not started, and automotive channels, after-sales, and residual-value systems still need validation.
    Comparison
    Awareness is higher than most Chinese car brands that have not entered Europe deeply.
    Risks
    Execution risk in European expansion in 2027, regulatory, and data-security trust issues.
  • XPeng, Li Auto, NIO
    Chinese EV companies; Bernstein rating is Market-Perform
    Strengths
    Have a foundation of EV technology and product awareness, and could benefit from rising European acceptance of Chinese EVs.
    Weaknesses
    Brand awareness, channel scale, profitability, and localization in Europe remain constrained.
    Comparison
    The report rates them more neutrally than Xiaomi’s Outperform stance.
    Risks
    Price competition, demand volatility, channel costs, policy, and residual-value risks.
  • Traditional European OEMs
    The main competitors as Chinese cars enter Europe
    Strengths
    Have mature brands, dealer networks, after-sales service, and customer trust, and will launch more affordable EVs in 2026-2027.
    Weaknesses
    BEV pricing remains a consumer purchase barrier; software and ADAS iteration speed needs to improve.
    Comparison
    Chinese brands are more attractive on price and value, but European OEMs remain stronger in channels and service trust.
    Risks
    If low-priced EV rollouts underperform or software capability falls behind, they may lose more share to Chinese brands.

Key data

  • Share of European consumers willing to consider buying a Chinese car55%Data as of Dec. 2025; it was 43% in Oct. 2023.
  • Share explicitly stating they would buy a Chinese car13%It was 6% two years ago, now more than double.
  • Share explicitly not considering Chinese cars21%It was 46% two years ago; resistance has clearly declined.
  • BYD brand awareness among European consumers52%Far above most Chinese brands.
  • Xiaomi brand awareness among European consumers39%Although no EVs have been sold in Europe yet, awareness is supported by smartphone, IoT, and home appliance businesses.
  • Concerns about the quality of Chinese cars44%Data from H2 2025; it was 51% in H1 2024, but quality remains a major barrier.
  • Concerns about lack of after-sales support19%Below 24% in H2 2023 and 28% in H1 2024.
  • Concerns about lack of sales outlets13%Down from 19% in H2 2023.
  • Openness in Spain and Hungary75%Countries most willing to consider Chinese cars in the survey.
  • Leapmotor Europe sales1,262 units in 2024; 33,567 units in 2025The report attributes this growth to access to Stellantis’s existing dealership system.

Impact & implications

From an investment perspective, Chinese EV and hybrid-exposure OEMs with stronger overseas operational footing are more likely to benefit from higher European acceptance and a high oil-price environment. BYD benefits from affordable models and higher margins in overseas EVs; Geely can scale from a lower export base while pushing HEV strategy; Xiaomi has brand awareness and expansion potential in Europe. But if Chinese brands do not improve residual value, after-sales service, channel partnerships, and local commercial terms, demand release may remain constrained. European OEMs face pricing pressure, but can still rely on brand, channels, service trust, and low-priced EV products in 2026-2027 to sustain mid-term advantage.

Risks

  • Chinese brand residual-value management lags behind Europe and other Asian peers, potentially weakening dealer confidence and brand economics.
  • Quality remains one of the main reasons European consumers do not consider Chinese cars, even though that concern has eased.
  • Advanced driving and connectivity features have not strongly resonated with European consumers, partly due to trust and data security concerns.
  • After-sales networks and sales networks have improved but remain areas of concern for consumers and fleet customers.
  • European tariffs, potential minimum import pricing, and other regulatory policies could affect the competitiveness of imported Chinese models.
  • Overreliance on leasing customers may depress residual values and damage long-term brand economics.

What to watch

  • The launch cadence and pricing of low-priced EVs by European OEMs in 2026-2027.
  • Progress in BYD, Xiaomi, Geely, and other Chinese brands’ localization in Europe across dealer networks, after-sales, and residual-value management.
  • How European consumer trust evolves regarding Chinese car quality, data security, and advanced driving functions.
  • Whether high-openness markets like Spain and Hungary translate into actual sales growth.
  • Changes in EU tariffs, minimum import prices, or other trade policies.
  • The penetration of Chinese OEMs in 2B corporate fleet customers and whether they avoid overexposure to leasing channels.
Zhejiang ICP No. 2022035445-5
Disclaimer: Market data, charts, indicators, research views, and other information provided on this website are intended solely for information display, research communication, and educational reference. They should not be regarded as personalized investment advice, securities recommendations, trading instructions, solicitations, or guarantees of return. While we strive to improve the reliability of our data and content, such information may still be subject to delays, errors, incompleteness, or untimely updates due to source differences, methodological limitations, system processing, or market volatility. Users should exercise independent judgment based on their own circumstances and bear all risks and responsibilities arising from the use of this website.

Settings

Sign in to view recent logins