Quick Summary
Covering the latest research from top Wall Street investment banks

Non-China NdFeB capacity is expanding rapidly, but bottlenecks lie in metals/alloys and cost competitiveness

Institution
Morgan Stanley
Date
2026-06-23
Authors
Rahul Anand, CFA, Michael A Stancliff
Company
MP MATERIALS CORP
Ticker
US.MP
Industry
Other Industrial Metals & Mining
Rating
Industry View: Attractive
BullishLow confidenceThe report gives the Australia Materials sector an Attractive view and believes that non-China NdFeB capacity expansion, supply-chain localization, and OEM shifts toward non-China suppliers will increase the industry's strategic value; however, costs, metal/alloy supply, customer certification, and export controls remain key constraints.
AuthorsRahul Anand, CFA, Michael A Stancliff
CoverageAsia-Pacific、Europe
Asset classesEquity
Business segmentsrare earth permanent magnet materials、NdFeB magnets、NdPr、Dy、Tb、rare earth metals and alloys supply
Research firm divisions/subsidiariesMorgan Stanley(Other)、Morgan Stanley Australia Limited(Other)

AI summary card

Non-China NdFeB capacity is expanding rapidly, but bottlenecks lie in metals/alloys and cost competitiveness

Morgan Stanley meeting notes show that U.S. NdFeB capacity may reach about 28 ktpa by 2028, theoretically enough to cover the current roughly 8.5 ktpa of import demand, but actual utilization depends on customer certification, oxide-to-metal conversion, strip-cast alloys, process control, and cost.

The industry view is Attractive; this report is an industry conference note and does not provide a stock rating, target price, or expected upside for MP MATERIALS CORP.
rare earth permanent magnetsNdFeBnon-China supply chainNdPrDy/Tbexport controlsMP MaterialsAttractive industry view
  • Experts expect U.S. NdFeB capacity to reach about 28 ktpa by 2028; if funded and potential projects are included, broader capacity could reach about 35 ktpa, and after 2028 it may further rise to 50-55 ktpa.
  • NdPr substitution is relatively difficult; total rare earth content in NdFeB has fallen only from about 32% to about 30.5% over the past two decades. Cost reduction and lower magnetic strength loss mainly come from reduced use of heavy rare earths such as Dy/Tb.
  • Western supply-chain weaknesses are concentrated in oxide-to-metal conversion, strip-cast alloys, automation, quality systems, skilled labor, and customer certification; mature companies typically need about 3 years from plant design to full production, while startups may need close to 6 years.
  • China's rare earth export controls have already affected OEM purchasing behavior, and customers are advancing approvals for non-China suppliers; defense demand may be less than 500 tpa, but the dual-use nature of the product adds commercial approval complexity.

Report interpretation

Overview

This report summarizes a discussion between Morgan Stanley and an expert with about 35 years of experience in the rare earth permanent magnet industry. The discussion focused on non-China magnet capacity expansion, lower rare earth usage, China-related supply risks, rare earth substitution risks, and the impact on demand for NdPr, Dy, and Tb. The core conclusion is that non-China NdFeB capacity is being built, especially in the U.S., where planned capacity is already sufficient relative to current imports, but converting nameplate capacity into effective output remains constrained by metal/alloy supply, manufacturing yields, customer certification, and cost competitiveness.

Core views

The report believes NdFeB still has a strong price-performance advantage, with limited risk of broad substitution. NdPr is more structural in the magnet chemistry system, while Ce/La substitutes are more likely to fill the low-cost, low-performance segment rather than replace high-performance NdFeB. The intensity of Dy/Tb use is declining more noticeably, and in some applications heavy rare earth demand has been reduced by more than 50% through grain boundary diffusion, grain boundary engineering, grain refinement, and lower operating temperatures. China's export controls and national security considerations are pushing OEMs to seek non-China sources, but commercialization still needs to solve cost and quality-system issues.

Analysis framework

The report uses an expert interview / conference note format, combining the expert's views on capacity projects, supply-chain links, technical substitution, end-market demand, and policy risks with current import volumes, application scenarios, and the industry rating framework to form a qualitative analysis of supply and demand in the rare earth permanent magnet value chain and its investment implications.

Methodology notes

  • Expert InterviewRare Earth Permanent Magnet Industry Discussion

    Assess non-China NdFeB capacity, rare earth substitution, and supply risks through discussions with industry experts.

    The expert has about 35 years of experience in the rare earth permanent magnet industry, and the views are used to supplement the industry assessment; the report also notes that the expert is not a member of Morgan Stanley Research and that the expert's views may differ from Morgan Stanley Research.

  • Industry ViewMorgan Stanley Industry View

    Attractive means the analyst expects the industry coverage portfolio to perform attractively relative to the relevant broad market benchmark over the next 12-18 months.

    This report discloses that the Industry View for Australia Materials is Attractive, but it does not provide a stock rating or target price for MP MATERIALS CORP.

Asset mapping & comparison

Structured mapping from thesis to named assets (strengths, weaknesses, peers, risks).

  • MP MATERIALS CORP
    The report mentions it as one of the covered companies tied to U.S. NdFeB capacity expansion.
    Strengths
    Benefits from U.S. rare earth supply-chain localization, non-China magnet capacity buildout, and OEM diversification of sourcing.
    Weaknesses
    Capacity utilization depends on customer certification, metal/alloy supply, yields, process control, and cost competitiveness.
    Comparison
    Compared with Chinese suppliers, Western producers may close the quality gap more quickly, but they are unlikely to match China's low-cost base in the short term.
    Risks
    Project execution, cost premium, certification delays, export-control compliance, and weaker-than-expected end-market demand.
  • NdPr
    The core rare earth input for high-performance NdFeB magnets.
    Strengths
    Substitution is relatively difficult, and total rare earth content has only fallen slightly over the past two decades, supporting resilient demand.
    Weaknesses
    Ce/La low-cost grades can siphon demand in some performance ranges.
    Comparison
    Compared with Dy/Tb, NdPr has less room for intensity reduction.
    Risks
    Changes in end-use motor technology and the shift of low-performance applications to ferrites or other magnet types.
  • Dy/Tb
    Heavy rare earths used to improve the performance of high-temperature and high-performance NdFeB magnets.
    Strengths
    Still used in high-temperature, aerospace, defense, and demanding applications.
    Weaknesses
    Grain boundary diffusion and design optimization have significantly reduced unit usage.
    Comparison
    Compared with NdPr, Dy/Tb use intensity has fallen more noticeably, and demand has been reduced by more than 50% in some applications.
    Risks
    Ongoing technological effort to reduce usage may make demand less elastic than end-market output growth.
  • NdFeB permanent magnets
    The core product discussed in the report, used in EVs, wind power, industrial applications, robotics, and defense.
    Strengths
    Strong price-performance advantage, and the expert does not expect broad substitution.
    Weaknesses
    Western capacity faces constraints in cost, automation, quality systems, and customer certification.
    Comparison
    Ferrites, alnico, and iron-nitride magnets are suitable for specific scenarios but cannot fully replace high-performance NdFeB.
    Risks
    Low-price competition from China, supply-chain bottlenecks, export controls, and changes in end-demand structure.

Key data

  • U.S. NdFeB capacity in 2028Approximately 28 ktpaBased on announced projects and expansion by mature U.S. manufacturers; if funded and potential projects are included, broader capacity is about 35 ktpa.
  • Current U.S. bulk magnet importsApproximately 8.5 ktpaSources include China, Vietnam, and Europe; if projects are executed successfully, announced capacity should theoretically cover current usage.
  • Potential U.S. capacity after 2028Approximately 50-55 ktpaThis is the expert's estimate of longer-term expansion potential.
  • Non-China capacity in Europe and JapanEurope approximately 3.6 ktpa, Japan approximately 6.8 ktpa+Based on expansion by existing producers and the current capacity base.
  • Change in total rare earth content in NdFeBAbout 32% down to about 30.5%The expert said total rare earth content has only declined slightly over the past two decades, indicating limited room for NdPr substitution.
  • Decline in heavy rare earth demandMore than 50% in some applicationsMainly achieved by reducing Dy/Tb usage through grain boundary diffusion, grain boundary engineering, grain refinement, and design changes.
  • Time from construction to full production for mature companiesAbout 3 yearsFrom plant design to full production; startups may need close to 6 years.
  • U.S. domestic NdFeB cost premiumAbout 50% higherThe expert estimates that magnets made in the U.S. may be about 50% more expensive than those sourced from China.
  • Defense NdFeB demandPossibly less than 500 tpaThe scale is small, but overlap with commercial and industrial applications may complicate approvals.
  • EV magnet usageAbout 12 g/kW, and slightly above 2 kg/vehicle for a battery electric light vehicleHybrid vehicles use about half as much magnet material as battery electric light vehicles.

Impact & implications

For investors, the expansion of non-China rare earth magnet supply chains increases the strategic importance of upstream and midstream assets such as MP Materials, but short-term attention should not be focused only on nameplate capacity. What really determines profitability and market share is metal/alloy supply, yields, quality systems, customer certification speed, and the cost curve. NdPr demand is more resilient, while Dy/Tb demand faces greater pressure from declining intensity; China's export controls raise the supply-chain security premium while also increasing commercial approval and compliance uncertainty.

Risks

  • Non-China projects underperform, so nameplate capacity cannot be converted into effective output.
  • Insufficient oxide-to-metal conversion and strip-cast alloy supply limit magnet manufacturing ramp-up.
  • Western magnet costs are significantly higher than Chinese supply, which may suppress customer adoption and margins.
  • Customer certification, quality systems, yields, and process control progress more slowly than expected.
  • China's export controls and dual-use approvals increase uncertainty in commercial transactions.
  • Demand growth for NdFeB in end markets such as wind power, EVs, or robotics is weaker than expected, or is diverted to other motor or magnet technologies.

What to watch

  • Construction progress, yields, and customer certification milestones for U.S. NdFeB capacity projects through 2028.
  • Metal/alloy supply capacity of non-China producers such as MP Materials, e-VAC / VacuumSchmelze, and Noveon Magnetics.
  • China's rare earth export control policies, commercial approval pace, and changes in OEM purchasing behavior.
  • Price trends for NdPr, Dy, and Tb, and the pace of further reductions in heavy rare earth unit usage.
  • Real demand for high-performance magnets from EVs, wind power, mobile robotics, and aerospace/defense.
  • Whether the quality gap and cost gap between Western magnets and Chinese magnets narrow.
Zhejiang ICP No. 2022035445-5
Disclaimer: Market data, charts, indicators, research views, and other information provided on this website are intended solely for information display, research communication, and educational reference. They should not be regarded as personalized investment advice, securities recommendations, trading instructions, solicitations, or guarantees of return. While we strive to improve the reliability of our data and content, such information may still be subject to delays, errors, incompleteness, or untimely updates due to source differences, methodological limitations, system processing, or market volatility. Users should exercise independent judgment based on their own circumstances and bear all risks and responsibilities arising from the use of this website.

Settings

Sign in to view recent logins