Quick Summary
Covering the latest research from top Wall Street investment banks

June credit came in below expectations, and pressure on bank loan demand and pricing continues

Institution
JPMorgan
Date
2026-07-15
Authors
Katherine Lei, Peter Zhang, Lincoln Yu, Haomin Chen
Company
-
Ticker
-
Industry
Banks
Rating
Most covered banks are rated OW; the report prefers CCB, BOC, ICBC, Citic, and CMB
BearishLow confidenceJune TSF and new RMB loans both came in below expectations, retail loans continued to contract year over year, pricing on new corporate loans declined, and loan mix deteriorated, which is expected to weigh on bank loan yields and asset quality.
AuthorsKatherine Lei, Peter Zhang, Lincoln Yu, Haomin Chen
Business segmentsState-owned banks、Joint-stock banks、Retail loans、Corporate loans、Corporate bond financing、Government bond financing、Deposits、Wealth management products
Research firm divisions/subsidiariesJPMorgan(Other)

AI summary card

June credit came in below expectations, and pressure on bank loan demand and pricing continues

JPMorgan believes China’s June credit data has a net negative impact: both TSF and new loans were below expectations, retail loans continued to contract, pricing on new loans declined, and banks’ net interest margins and asset quality remain under pressure.

The report’s net view is negative, but it prefers high-quality banks with stronger earnings resilience: CCB, BOC, ICBC, Citic, and CMB; disclosed companies include 0939.HK, 3988.HK, 1398.HK, 0998.HK, and 3968.HK, all rated OW.
China banksJune creditTSFRetail loansLoan pricingNet interest marginDeposit competitionCorporate bond financing
  • June TSF balance growth slowed from 7.7% in May to 7.4%, while RMB loan balance growth slowed from 5.5% to 5.2%; both new TSF and new RMB loans were below Bloomberg expectations.
  • Retail loan demand remained weak, with only Rmb265bn of new retail loans in June, and retail loan balances fell 1.3% year over year, indicating weak demand for both mortgages and consumer credit.
  • The weighted average interest rate on newly issued corporate loans was about 3.0%, down around 20bps year over year and below the roughly 3.1% level in March 2026, which is expected to offset some of the benefit from time-deposit repricing.
  • Corporate bond financing remained strong, reaching Rmb401bn in June, up 66% year over year, supporting total social financing but potentially diverting demand away from bank loans.
  • Deposit growth at 8.2% remained above loan growth at 5.2%, indicating ample system liquidity and helping ease deposit competition pressure.

Report interpretation

Overview

This report analyzes the impact of China’s June 2026 credit and total social financing data on the banking sector. JPMorgan believes the data reflect a macro narrative of “production still showing resilience while consumption remains weak,” which for banks translates into lower-than-expected new loans, contracting retail loans, declining loan pricing, and deteriorating loan mix. Although strong corporate bond financing and deposit growth still outpacing loan growth provide some cushion for liquidity and deposit competition pressure, overall weak credit demand and pressure on loan yields lead the report to a net negative view on the banking sector.

Core views

The core views are as follows: first, both new TSF and new RMB loans were below market expectations, and credit expansion continued to slow; second, retail loans contracted year over year, mortgage and consumer credit demand remained weak, and the decline in the share of high-yield retail loans led to deterioration in loan mix; third, interest rates on newly issued corporate loans fell both year over year and quarter over quarter, and together with weaker loan mix in 2Q, this may pressure overall bank loan yields and offset gains from time-deposit repricing; fourth, both M1 and M2 growth slowed, and the negative M1-M2 gap widened, consistent with slower 2Q26 real GDP growth, pointing to macro demand pressure; fifth, policy language suggests regulators are shifting attention from quantity-based credit growth to price-based policy management, and weak loan growth is not a high-priority short-term policy target.

Analysis framework

The report uses a linked analysis of macro credit data and bank operating indicators: it first compares macro credit and economic indicators such as TSF, new RMB loans, M1/M2, and GDP, then breaks down retail loans, corporate loans, bill financing, bond financing, and deposit structure to assess the transmission to loan demand, loan mix, pricing changes, net interest margins, and asset quality. The report also incorporates statements from the PBOC press conference to infer policy priorities and map them to bank stock preferences.

Methodology notes

  • Macro credit analysisTSF and loan growth framework

    Assess real-economy financing demand and bank credit momentum through TSF balance growth, new TSF, new RMB loans, and their components.

    June TSF and new RMB loans were below expectations, and balance growth continued to slow, indicating weakening credit expansion momentum; while strong bond financing supported TSF, it may divert demand from bank loans.

  • Bank earnings analysisLoan mix and net interest margin analysis

    Assess the direction of bank loan yields and net interest margins through the mix of retail loans, corporate loans, bill financing, and interest rates on newly issued loans.

    Contracting high-yield retail loans, lower corporate loan pricing, and weaker loan mix in 2Q are expected to leave 2Q26 net interest margins flat to slightly down quarter over quarter.

  • Macro liquidity analysisM1-M2 gap and deposit-loan growth spread

    Use the M1-M2 growth gap to measure corporate cash activation and macro demand, and the gap between deposit and loan growth to assess system liquidity and deposit competition.

    The M1-M2 gap widened to -4.0% in June, pointing to macro pressure; deposit growth remained above loan growth, indicating ample liquidity and easing deposit competition.

Asset mapping & comparison

Structured mapping from thesis to named assets (strengths, weaknesses, peers, risks).

  • China Construction Bank - H (0939.HK)
    Preferred in the report; rated OW
    Strengths
    As one of the high-quality state-owned banks, it is listed among JPMorgan’s preferred banks for earnings resilience; disclosed price is HK$8.17, and the latest historical target price table shows a target price of HK$10.1 on 08-Jul-26.
    Weaknesses
    Still affected by sector-wide weak loan demand, lower loan pricing, and pressure on net interest margins.
    Comparison
    Preferred together with BOC and ICBC among SOE banks.
    Risks
    Pressure on retail loan asset quality, declining loan yields, and persistently weak macro demand.
  • Bank of China - H (3988.HK)
    Preferred in the report; rated OW
    Strengths
    As one of the preferred state-owned bank names, it has relatively resilient earnings; disclosed price is HK$4.65, and the latest historical target price table shows a target price of HK$6.15 on 09-Jul-26.
    Weaknesses
    Affected by the banking sector’s overall slower loan growth and deteriorating loan mix.
    Comparison
    Preferred together with CCB and ICBC among SOE banks.
    Risks
    Pressure on net interest margins, weak macro demand, and asset quality risk.
  • Industrial and Commercial Bank of China - H (1398.HK)
    Preferred in the report; rated OW
    Strengths
    As one of the large state-owned banks, it is listed among the preferred SOE banks; disclosed price is HK$6.41, and the latest historical target price table shows a target price of HK$8.4 on 11-Jul-26.
    Weaknesses
    Slower loan growth and lower rates on newly issued loans may pressure revenue.
    Comparison
    Together with CCB and BOC, it forms the report’s preferred state-owned bank basket.
    Risks
    Declining loan yields, pressure on retail asset quality, and slowing macro growth.
  • China Citic Bank - H (0998.HK)
    Preferred in the report; rated OW
    Strengths
    As one of the preferred joint-stock banks, the report believes it has relatively resilient earnings; disclosed price is HK$7.01.
    Weaknesses
    Joint-stock banks also face insufficient credit demand, deteriorating loan mix, and pricing competition.
    Comparison
    Preferred together with CMB among JSBs.
    Risks
    Falling net interest margins, pressure on retail loan quality, and loan demand diversion as corporate financing shifts toward bonds.
  • China Merchants Bank - H (3968.HK)
    Preferred in the report; rated OW
    Strengths
    As one of the preferred joint-stock banks, it has strong retail and wealth-management characteristics; disclosed price is HK$46.20, and the latest historical target price table shows a target price of HK$62 on 22-Apr-26.
    Weaknesses
    Its retail business is more sensitive to contracting retail loans and weak consumer credit.
    Comparison
    Preferred together with Citic among JSBs.
    Risks
    Weak retail credit demand, asset quality pressure, and pressure on net interest margins.
  • China banking sector overall
    Net view is negative
    Strengths
    Deposit growth is higher than loan growth, and system liquidity is ample; strong corporate bond financing supports TSF; the share of bill financing in new loans fell significantly versus May.
    Weaknesses
    New loans and TSF were below expectations, retail loans contracted year over year, pricing on new loans declined, and loan mix deteriorated.
    Comparison
    Bond financing balance growth of 12.8% is significantly higher than bank loan growth of 5.2%, showing that direct financing is diverting bank credit.
    Risks
    Further macro demand weakness, the PBOC not treating weak loan growth as a high-priority short-term policy target, and 2Q26 net interest margins being flat to slightly down quarter over quarter.

Key data

  • June TSF balance growth7.4% y/yBelow 7.7% in May.
  • June RMB loan balance growth5.2% y/yBelow 5.5% in May.
  • June new TSFRmb3.36tnBelow Bloomberg expectation of Rmb3.71tn.
  • June new RMB loansRmb1.61tnBelow Bloomberg expectation of Rmb1.95tn.
  • June new retail loansRmb265bnBelow Rmb598bn in June 2025, accounting for only 16% of new loans.
  • Retail loan balance growth-1.3% y/yVersus -0.9% in May, showing deeper contraction.
  • Medium- to long-term retail loan growth0.5% y/yVersus 0.8% in May, reflecting weak mortgage-related demand.
  • Short-term retail loan growth-6.7% y/yVersus -6.0% in May, reflecting weak consumer credit demand.
  • Weighted average interest rate on newly issued corporate loansabout 3.0%Down about 20bps year over year in 6M26, below about 3.1% in March 2026.
  • Interest rate on newly issued personal housing loansabout 3.1%Basically stable year over year in 6M26.
  • Interest rate on newly issued inclusive small and micro enterprise loansabout 3.57%Down 16bps year over year in June.
  • M1 growth4.0% y/yVersus 5.5% in May, below Bloomberg consensus of 4.9%.
  • M2 growth8.0% y/yVersus 8.6% in May, below market consensus.
  • M1-M2 growth gap-4.0%Versus -3.1% in May, with the negative gap widening.
  • 2Q26 real GDP growth4.3% y/y1Q26 was 5.0%.
  • June corporate bond financingRmb401bnUp 66% year over year and 139% month over month.
  • June government bond financingRmb768bnDown 43% year over year.
  • Corporate and government bond financing balance growth12.8% y/ySignificantly above bank loan growth of 5.2%.
  • June deposit growth8.2% y/yVersus 8.7% in May, but still above loan growth of 5.2%.
  • Demand deposit ratio26.5%Basically stable month over month versus May; corporate demand deposit ratio rose 35bps month over month, while retail fell 18bps.

Impact & implications

For bank stocks, the report views the credit data as net negative. Weak demand and contracting retail loans may suppress the share of high-yield loans and increase pressure on retail asset quality; lower pricing on new loans will reduce asset-side yields, potentially leaving 2Q26 net interest margins flat to slightly down quarter over quarter. On the positive side, deposit growth still exceeds loan growth and system liquidity remains ample, helping ease deposit competition; strong corporate bond financing supports aggregate TSF, but also implies direct financing is substituting for bank loans. From an investment perspective, the report recommends a relative preference for high-quality banks with stronger earnings resilience and more robust asset quality and liability cost management.

Risks

  • New loans and TSF continue to come in below expectations, further slowing credit expansion.
  • Retail loans continue to contract, with weak demand for mortgages and consumer loans.
  • The decline in the share of high-yield retail loans leads to deterioration in loan mix.
  • Falling rates on newly issued corporate loans and inclusive small and micro loans suppress banks’ asset-side yields.
  • 2Q26 net interest margins may be flat to slightly down quarter over quarter.
  • Weak macro demand may keep pressure on retail loan asset quality.
  • Strong bond financing may divert demand away from bank loans.
  • The policy focus is shifting from quantity-based credit growth to price-based management, and weak loan growth may lack a strong policy response in the short term.

What to watch

  • Whether TSF and RMB loan balance growth continue to slow in coming months.
  • Whether retail loan balance growth, medium- to long-term retail loans, and short-term retail loans stabilize.
  • Changes in rates on newly issued corporate loans, personal housing loans, and inclusive small and micro loans.
  • Actual 2Q26 bank net interest margin performance, and whether time-deposit repricing can offset asset-side pressure.
  • Whether M1, M2, and the M1-M2 gap continue to point to weak macro demand.
  • Whether corporate and government bond financing continue to substitute for bank loans.
  • Deposit growth, the demand deposit ratio, and the migration trend of retail deposits toward wealth management/fund products.
  • The PBOC’s subsequent policy language on loan growth, interest rates, and financing structure.
Zhejiang ICP No. 2022035445-5
Disclaimer: Market data, charts, indicators, research views, and other information provided on this website are intended solely for information display, research communication, and educational reference. They should not be regarded as personalized investment advice, securities recommendations, trading instructions, solicitations, or guarantees of return. While we strive to improve the reliability of our data and content, such information may still be subject to delays, errors, incompleteness, or untimely updates due to source differences, methodological limitations, system processing, or market volatility. Users should exercise independent judgment based on their own circumstances and bear all risks and responsibilities arising from the use of this website.

Settings

Sign in to view recent logins