Quick Summary
Covering the latest research from top Wall Street investment banks

EM Asia ex-China sees record-level foreign outflows, while MSCI rebalancing may trigger massive two-way flows

Institution
Goldman Sachs
Date
2026-05-15
Authors
Sunil Koul, Mark Hung, Timothy Moe, CFA, Alvin So, CFA, Si Fu, Ph.D., Kinger Lau, CFA, John Kwon, Amorita Goel, CFA, Tarun Lalwani, CFA, Mambuna Njie
Company
-
Ticker
-
Industry
Portfolio Strategy; Emerging Markets; Financial Data & Stock Exchanges
Rating
-
NeutralLow confidenceThe core evidence in the report shows that EM Asia ex-China saw roughly US$17bn of net foreign outflows this week, the second-largest weekly sell-off on record; Korea and Taiwan were the main sources of outflows, but domestic retail buying in Korea offset part of the pressure.
AuthorsSunil Koul, Mark Hung, Timothy Moe, CFA, Alvin So, CFA, Si Fu, Ph.D., Kinger Lau, CFA, John Kwon, Amorita Goel, CFA, Tarun Lalwani, CFA, Mambuna Njie
CoverageAsia-Pacific、Other
Asset classesEquity
Business segmentsforeign institutional investor flows、domestic retail flows、southbound stock connect flows、global equity mutual fund flows、MSCI index rebalancing
Research firm divisions/subsidiariesGoldman Sachs(Other)、MSCI INC(Other)

AI summary card

EM Asia ex-China sees record-level foreign outflows, while MSCI rebalancing may trigger massive two-way flows

Goldman Sachs tracking shows that EM Asia ex-China saw about US$17bn of foreign outflows this week, with Korea contributing roughly -US$13.2bn, while Korean retail investors bought about US$14.1bn; MSCI's May rebalancing is expected to trigger more than US$76bn of total two-way passive flows in the APAC core index.

This report tracks fund flows and index rebalancing and does not provide stock-specific ratings, target prices, or explicit buy/sell recommendations.
Emerging market flowsEM Asia ex-ChinaForeign outflowsKorea marketMSCI rebalancingPassive flowsLocal retail flowsGlobal equity funds
  • EM Asia ex-China saw roughly US$17bn of net foreign outflows this week, the second-largest weekly foreign selling on record, driven mainly by Korea and Taiwan.
  • Korea saw about US$13.2bn of foreign outflows this week, while domestic retail investors bought about US$14.1bn, providing market support.
  • Foreign investors have recently sold a net US$29bn in EM ex-China, reversing the US$19bn of net buying since the April low.
  • MSCI's May index rebalance is expected to generate more than US$76bn of total two-way flows in APAC core indexes and about US$44bn of total two-way flows in GEM markets.
  • Global equity funds saw about US$21bn of inflows this week, including net buying of US$21.9bn in U.S. funds, US$1.5bn of outflows in Europe, and US$4.6bn of inflows in Japan.

Report interpretation

Overview

This report is Goldman Sachs' weekly tracking of emerging markets, especially EM Asia ex-China fund flows, institutional and retail flows, southbound flows, global equity fund flows, and the impact of MSCI's May 2026 index rebalancing. The core conclusion is that EM Asia ex-China saw roughly US$17bn of foreign outflows in a single week, the second-largest weekly selling on record, with Korea and Taiwan the main drags; meanwhile, local retail investors in Korea bought heavily, offsetting part of the foreign selling pressure.

Core views

First, short-term foreign flows into EM Asia ex-China weakened materially, with about US$16.9bn to US$17bn of outflows this week, including about -US$13.2bn from Korea and -US$2.5bn from Taiwan. Second, foreign investors have recently sold a net US$29bn in EM ex-China, showing that the US$19bn of buying since the April low has been reversed. Third, local funds have provided an offset in some markets, with Korean retail investors buying about US$14.1bn this week and retail inflows across Asia totaling about US$27bn year to date. Fourth, MSCI's May rebalance will drive significant passive reallocation; APAC core indexes are expected to generate more than US$76bn of total two-way flows, while Taiwan, Korea, South Africa, and Saudi Arabia are expected to see large passive inflows, and Indonesia, India, China, Mexico, and Turkey are expected to face larger outflows.

Analysis framework

The report focuses on weekly flow monitoring, combining foreign institutional investor flows, local institutional and retail flows, southbound flows, global and regional equity fund flows, and passive flow estimates from MSCI index rebalancing to compare inflow and outflow pressure across countries, regions, and sectors. Data sources include Bloomberg, AMFI, TEJ, FactSet, MSCI, and fund AUM data.

Methodology notes

  • fund_flow_trackingFII flows and domestic retail flows monitoring

    Comparison of foreign institutional investor flows and domestic retail flows

    By comparing foreign net buying/selling with local investor buying/selling, the report assesses whether market pressure is being absorbed by domestic funds. In this report, Korea's large foreign selling but heavy retail buying is a key offset signal.

  • index_rebalancingMSCI Global Investable Market Indexes review flow analysis

    Estimation of passive flows from index rebalancing

    Based on changes in MSCI index constituents and weights, the report estimates the total two-way flow and net passive flow from passive funds before and after the rebalance takes effect, helping identify markets and sectors that may benefit or come under pressure.

  • regional_fund_flowGlobal equity mutual fund flows

    Global equity mutual fund flows

    By observing weekly subscription/redemption flows in global, developed-market, emerging-market, and country funds, the report gauges cross-regional risk appetite and capital reallocation trends.

Asset mapping & comparison

Structured mapping from thesis to named assets (strengths, weaknesses, peers, risks).

  • EM Asia ex-China equities
    Core tracking asset
    Strengths
    Some markets have domestic retail support, with particularly strong retail inflows in Korea.
    Weaknesses
    Foreign outflows were about US$17bn this week, the second-highest weekly selling on record, putting short-term pressure on funding conditions.
    Comparison
    Compared with roughly US$620mn of weekly selling in non-Asia emerging markets, the foreign outflow from EM Asia ex-China was much larger.
    Risks
    If foreign outflows continue, valuations and liquidity may remain under pressure.
  • Korea equities
    Main outflow and retail absorption market
    Strengths
    Domestic retail investors bought about US$14.1bn this week, providing clear support.
    Weaknesses
    Foreign outflows of about US$13.2bn this week were the largest source of regional selling pressure.
    Comparison
    In the MSCI rebalance, Korea is expected to be one of the EM markets receiving larger passive inflows.
    Risks
    If foreign selling pressure persists, the durability of retail absorption will need to be watched.
  • Taiwan equities
    Market with both foreign outflows and MSCI passive inflows
    Strengths
    MSCI rebalancing is expected to make Taiwan one of the EM markets with larger passive inflows.
    Weaknesses
    Foreign outflows were about US$2.5bn this week, and retail investors also sold about US$0.8bn.
    Comparison
    Unlike Korea, Taiwan did not show clear retail absorption this week.
    Risks
    Foreign and retail outflows together could amplify short-term volatility.
  • China equities
    Potential passive outflow market from MSCI rebalancing
    Strengths
    Southbound inflows still came in at about US$1.2bn this week, or about US$37bn year to date.
    Weaknesses
    China is expected to be one of the larger passive outflow markets in the MSCI rebalance.
    Comparison
    In contrast to expected passive inflows for Taiwan and Korea, China faces rebalance-related passive outflow pressure.
    Risks
    Passive outflows combined with weaker foreign risk appetite could weigh on short-term funding conditions.
  • Global equity funds
    Global risk appetite indicator
    Strengths
    Global equity funds saw about US$21bn of inflows this week, with notable inflows into U.S. and Japan funds.
    Weaknesses
    European funds saw outflows of about US$1.5bn, and key GEM funds saw outflows of about US$2.6bn this week.
    Comparison
    U.S. inflows among developed markets were stronger than in parts of emerging markets and Europe.
    Risks
    If global funds continue to favor the U.S., EM funding recovery may be limited.
  • MSCI INC
    Entity related to index data and rebalancing analysis
    Strengths
    MSCI index rebalancing is the core input for passive flow estimates.
    Weaknesses
    The report cites MSCI data and notes related intellectual property and usage restrictions.
    Comparison
    MSCI rebalancing affects passive index flows rather than active investment recommendations.
    Risks
    Actual flows may differ from estimates due to tracking error, fund execution pace, liquidity, and market conditions.

Key data

  • Foreign outflows from EM Asia ex-China this weekAbout US$17bnThe second-largest weekly foreign selling on record, driven mainly by Korea and Taiwan.
  • Foreign outflows from Korea this week-US$13.2bnThe largest source of foreign outflows in EM Asia ex-China this week.
  • Foreign outflows from Taiwan this week-US$2.5bnOne of the main foreign outflow markets this week.
  • Recent foreign net selling in EM ex-ChinaUS$29bnIt had previously seen net buying of US$19bn since the April low.
  • Recent foreign net selling in EM Asia ex-ChinaUS$26bnIt had previously seen net buying of US$16bn since the March low.
  • Korea retail buying this week+US$14.1bnDomestic retail buying offset foreign selling pressure.
  • Retail inflows into Asia year to dateUS$27bnShows that local retail funds are still providing support.
  • Southbound inflows this week+US$1.2bnYear to date southbound inflows are about US$37bn.
  • MSCI rebalance total two-way flows for APAC core indexesMore than US$76bnThe rebalance is expected to take effect after the May 29 close.
  • MSCI rebalance total two-way flows for GEM core indexesAbout US$44bnExpected GEM net passive flow is about -US$500mn.
  • Global equity fund inflows this weekUS$21bnAbove last week's inflow of about US$3bn.
  • Net buying by U.S. funds this weekUS$21.9bnU.S. inflows were significant among developed markets.
  • Outflows from key GEM funds this weekUS$2.6bnBut GEM funds still saw about US$57bn of inflows year to date.
  • Non-Asia emerging market selling this weekUS$620mnMainly driven by Brazil at about -US$420mn.

Impact & implications

In the near term, the large foreign outflow from EM Asia ex-China reflects weaker overseas risk appetite or reallocation pressure, with Korea and Taiwan hit most clearly; however, the large buying by Korean retail investors shows that local funds can still provide some market buffer. In the medium term, MSCI's May rebalance may trigger large passive trading in APAC and GEM markets, with Taiwan, Korea, South Africa, and Saudi Arabia likely to benefit from passive inflows, while Indonesia, India, China, Mexico, and Turkey may face passive outflow pressure. At the sector level, technology hardware and semiconductors, as well as metals and mining, may receive larger passive inflows, while capital goods, consumer retail, and services may come under pressure.

Risks

  • Foreign outflows may continue, further pressuring funding conditions and sentiment in EM Asia ex-China.
  • Although retail buying in Korea is offsetting foreign selling in the short term, its durability and risk tolerance remain uncertain.
  • Passive flows from MSCI rebalancing may magnify stock, sector, and market volatility around the effective date.
  • Passive flow estimates depend on index weights, prices, free float, and fund tracking size, so actual trading may differ from estimates.
  • This report is a flow and thematic study and does not constitute independent stock-specific investment advice, and past flows do not predict future performance.

What to watch

  • Watch whether foreign outflows from EM Asia ex-China evolve from a one-week shock into a sustained trend.
  • Track whether domestic retail buying in Korea continues to offset foreign selling pressure.
  • Focus on passive trading and market impact before and after MSCI rebalancing takes effect after the May 29 close.
  • Pay close attention to the passive inflows into Taiwan, Korea, South Africa, and Saudi Arabia, and the passive outflows from Indonesia, India, China, Mexico, and Turkey.
  • Compare whether global equity funds continue to flow into the U.S. and Japan while withdrawing from GEM funds.
  • Monitor whether southbound flows continue the year-to-date inflow trend.
Zhejiang ICP No. 2022035445-5
Disclaimer: Market data, charts, indicators, research views, and other information provided on this website are intended solely for information display, research communication, and educational reference. They should not be regarded as personalized investment advice, securities recommendations, trading instructions, solicitations, or guarantees of return. While we strive to improve the reliability of our data and content, such information may still be subject to delays, errors, incompleteness, or untimely updates due to source differences, methodological limitations, system processing, or market volatility. Users should exercise independent judgment based on their own circumstances and bear all risks and responsibilities arising from the use of this website.

Settings

Sign in to view recent logins