U.S. consumption growth has slowed, but is expected to recover mildly in the second half
AI summary card
U.S. consumption growth has slowed, but is expected to recover mildly in the second half
Morgan Stanley sees U.S. real consumption in the first half as weakened by high inflation, weak real income, and a slowdown in service consumption, while tax rebates supported durable-goods spending; as inflation eases and real income improves, consumption is expected to recover moderately in the second half.
- Real consumption growth in H1 2026 was tracked at 1.2% annualized, below 2.1% in 2025, with service consumption being the main drag.
- High prices, tariffs, and oil-price pressure weakened purchasing power, with real disposable income in H1 2026 tracked at 0.6% annualized decline, and real labor income even weaker.
- Tax rebates rose 19% year-over-year, to about $57bn, and a larger proportion may have been spent quickly on durable and big-ticket goods, explaining the resilience of goods, especially durable goods.
- The report expects real income to return to positive growth in H2, with Q3 and Q4 consumption growth around 2.0%, and full-year 4Q/4Q consumption growth around 1.7%.
- Key risks include inflation not declining as expected, a need for tighter monetary policy, downward revisions to service consumption data, and continued pressure on lower- and middle-income households.
Report interpretation
Overview
This report analyzes why U.S. consumption growth has slowed since early 2026. The core view is that weak real consumption mainly stems from high inflation eroding purchasing power, tariff and oil-price pressures pushing down real income, and broad deceleration in service consumption. At the same time, tax rebates have provided temporary support to goods and durable-goods consumption, making the consumption mix different from prior expectations.
Core views
The report argues that U.S. consumption has not fully stalled, but is under temporary pressure from falling real income and seasonal inflation noise. H1 real consumption growth was about 1.2% annualized, clearly below 2.1% last year; service consumption eased from 2.4% in 2025 to about 1.1%, while goods consumption instead accelerated, supported by durable goods. Morgan Stanley expects that as second-half inflation cools and real income turns positive, consumption growth will recover mildly and first be led by services, with full-year consumption growth around 1.7%; in 2027, supported by further inflation decline and productivity gains, the recovery is expected to spread to more income groups and product categories.
Analysis framework
The report combines personal income and spending data, Q1 GDP revisions, BEA service-consumption data, AlphaWise Consumer Pulse rebate-use survey, changes in auto ABS delinquency, income-bracket consumption structure, and inflation and oil-price models to decompose the sources and future path of the consumption slowdown.
Methodology notes
Relationship between real disposable income and consumption spending
The report treats real income growth as the core driver of consumption spending, arguing that high inflation, tariffs, and oil-price shocks weakened real income, thereby explaining the consumption slowdown.
Residual seasonality raises Q1 inflation and suppresses real consumption
The report argues that BEA inflation seasonality after the pandemic may not have fully removed seasonality, causing Q1 measured inflation to be too high and mechanically lowering real income and real consumption.
Immediate consumption share of tax rebates
By comparing historical patterns, the AlphaWise survey, and auto ABS delinquency, the report infers that a higher share of tax rebates may be spent quickly on goods and durable goods this year.
Higher-income groups dominate certain consumption categories
Using income-quantile analysis of consumption shares, the report notes that the categories now accelerating, including durables and some big-ticket items, are more heavily led by higher-income groups, while lower- and middle-income households remain under pressure from weak real income.
Asset mapping & comparison
Structured mapping from thesis to named assets (strengths, weaknesses, peers, risks).
- United States macroeconomyConsumption is a core growth variable, and the report directly evaluates the slowdown and reacceleration path of consumption.
- Strengths
- Employment growth remains strong, inflation expectations have declined, and real income is expected to recover in the second half.
- Weaknesses
- Real income was weak in H1, service consumption slowed broadly, and lingering high-price effects remain.
- Comparison
- Consumption growth is expected to remain below 2025 in 2026 but may move closer to 2025’s pace in 2027.
- Risks
- Inflation stays elevated, monetary policy is forced to tighten, and service-consumption data is revised down.
- United States service consumptionService consumption was the main source of slowdown this year and the key focus for expected recovery in the second half.
- Strengths
- Employment data and historical revision experience suggest part of service consumption may be revised up; unwind of residual seasonality could be supportive for services.
- Weaknesses
- Q1 service deceleration covered multiple categories including healthcare, dining, financial services, professional services, and travel.
- Comparison
- Service consumption slowed from 2.4% in 2025 to about 1.1% by May.
- Risks
- If QSS data leads to further downward revision of service spending, the underlying trend would be weaker than the report assumes.
- United States durable goods consumptionDurables are the main contributor to goods consumption being stronger than expected.
- Strengths
- Big-ticket categories such as vehicles, furniture, and appliances are supported by tax rebates and previously repressed demand.
- Weaknesses
- Rebate support may be front-loaded, and lagged oil-price effects on goods spending may surface in Q3.
- Comparison
- Durable goods were up 2.3% annualized as of May, far above last year's 0.1% 4Q/4Q growth.
- Risks
- Rebate effects fading, oil-price and rate pressure, and insufficient demand from lower- and middle-income households.
- United States consumer credit and auto ABSAuto ABS delinquency is used to judge whether rebates are flowing more to consumption than debt repayment.
- Strengths
- Credit card performance in banks improved more clearly, showing some resilience in consumer balance sheets.
- Weaknesses
- Improvements in prime and subprime auto ABS delinquency are both weaker than implied by historical relationships.
- Comparison
- Prime auto ABS delinquency declined 15% versus 19% expected, and subprime declined 17% versus 21% expected.
- Risks
- If lower- and middle-income cash flow remains under pressure, credit quality may deteriorate again.
- High-income consumption-related categoriesSeveral categories that accelerated this year have a higher share from higher-income households.
- Strengths
- Higher-income households have relatively high shares in durable goods, vehicles, furniture, home appliances, and recreational vehicles.
- Weaknesses
- Some high-income-dominated service categories also slowed markedly in Q1, possibly affected by weak stock performance.
- Comparison
- The top 20% income group accounts for about 40% of total consumption but about 55% of durable goods consumption.
- Risks
- Weaker wealth effects, stock market volatility, and persistent K-shaped consumption.
Key data
- Real consumption growth in H1 20261.2% annualizedLower than the 2.1% growth rate in 2025.
- Real consumption growth in Q1 20260.5%The report describes Q1 as very weak.
- Real consumption growth track in Q2 20261.9% q/q saarA pickup versus Q1.
- Goods consumption growth1.7%As of May, real goods spending was above 1.4% last year.
- Service consumption growth1.1%As of May, below 2.4% last year.
- Durable goods consumption growth2.3% annualizedAs of May, substantially higher than 0.1% 4Q/4Q last year.
- Real disposable income-0.6% annualizedTracked value in H1 2026.
- Real labor income-1.0%Tracked value in H1 2026, weaker than overall real disposable income.
- Savings ratefrom 3.6% down to 3.0%From end-2025 to end-May 2026, indicating consumers drew down savings to smooth price shocks.
- Residual seasonal effectabout 60-80 bpsThe report estimates it may shave about 60-80 bps from Q1 real consumption growth.
- Tax rebatesup 19% YoY, about $57bnRebate size is roughly in line with expectations, but the share spent quickly may be above expectations.
- Assumed share of rebates consumed within three monthsabout 50% vs 35% prior assumptionIf about 50% of rebates are spent quickly and mostly on goods, this could explain stronger-than-forecast Q2 goods spending.
- Q3 and Q4 consumption growth forecastabout 2.0%About 0.5 percentage points stronger than H1.
- Full-year 2026 consumption growth forecastabout 1.7% 4Q/4QStill below 2.1% in 2025.
- PCE inflation forecastheadline 3.3%, core 3.0% 4Q/4QThe report expects inflation to subsequently decline toward the Fed's 2.0% goal.
- Projected H2 real income growth2.2% annualizedExpected recovery in real income driven by easing inflation.
- Top 20% income group share of consumptionabout 40% of total consumption, 55% durables, 30% nondurablesHigher-income households have a larger share in durables and some big-ticket consumption.
Impact & implications
For macro and asset allocation, the report points to U.S. consumption gradually repairing from first-half price shocks and abnormally weak service consumption, but with the strength of the recovery constrained by lingering high-price effects. If inflation declines as expected and the Fed remains on standby, improving real income should support a rebound in service consumption in H2 2026 and spread through more consumer categories and income groups in 2027; conversely, if sticky inflation forces higher rates and tighter financial conditions, affordability issues for lower- and middle-income households will continue to weigh on growth.
Risks
- Inflation does not decline as expected, continuing to suppress real income and affordability.
- If disinflation requires higher rates or tighter financial conditions, consumption would be further weighed down.
- If BEA service-consumption data is revised down, the underlying consumption trend is weaker than the current assumption.
- The lagged impact of oil shocks on goods consumption may emerge in Q3.
- Rebate support for goods spending may be front-loaded, with subsequent pullback risk.
- Lower- and middle-income consumers remain under pressure from falling real income, Medicaid and SNAP benefit reductions, so the recovery may be slower than expected.
What to watch
- After August QSS data are incorporated, whether April and May service consumption are revised up or down.
- Whether headline and core PCE inflation in the second half declines as the report expects.
- Whether real disposable income and real labor income recover to positive growth.
- Lagged effects of gasoline and Brent oil price paths on goods consumption.
- Changes in consumer credit quality, including auto ABS and credit cards.
- Whether high-income service consumption recovers in Q2 and the second half.
- Whether wage growth improvement for lower-income groups can offset benefit cuts and high-price pressure.
- Whether the Fed stays on hold, or tightens policy due to sticky inflation.