Prices along the main PV chain stabilized in May, but profit recovery remains pressured by inventory and falling costs
AI summary card
Prices along the main PV chain stabilized in May, but profit recovery remains pressured by inventory and falling costs
Goldman Sachs believes prices along China’s PV main chain were broadly stable in May, with module margins improving on falling material prices, but weakening glass and film, plus global module demand tracking below its full-year forecast path, mean the industry must still remain alert to downside price risks.
- Prices across the major value chain were largely flat in May, but photovoltaic glass fell 7% and film fell 6%, reflecting pressure from inventory build and lower oil prices.
- Module cash profitability improved by 2 percentage points month over month, mainly due to easing material prices; glass profitability fell a further 10 percentage points due to declining prices.
- Global module demand in April 2026 fell 58% year over year to 33GW, while 4M26 fell 30% year over year to 156GW, below Goldman Sachs’ FY26 forecast path of a 12% year-over-year decline.
- Within its coverage universe, Goldman Sachs favors Maxwell, Hangzhou First, and Longi, while remaining cautious on Rod Poly and Glass-related names.
Report interpretation
Overview
This report is part of Goldman Sachs’ China solar profitability tracking series, which monthly tracks supply and demand, inventory, spot prices, input costs, and the implied trends in cash gross margin and EBITDA margin across photovoltaic sub-sectors. The core conclusion is that while prices along the main value chain stabilized temporarily in May, weak demand, elevated inventories, potential upstream supply additions, and lower module costs mean downside price risks have not yet disappeared.
Core views
Goldman Sachs believes that although prices along the main chain were broadly stable in May, trading activity was slow due to weak price expectations and limited module order visibility. Glass and film were the clearest weak links, with glass dragged down by inventory accumulation and film impacted by falling oil prices. On profitability, modules improved thanks to easing material costs, while glass deteriorated further. In stock selection, Goldman Sachs favors Maxwell for its new application opportunities, Hangzhou First for film price increases and unit-profit expansion potential, and Longi for its energy storage potential and EBITDA resilience from lower upstream prices; at the same time, it remains cautious on Rod Poly and Glass.
Analysis framework
The report mainly uses monthly industry chain tracking, combining China installations, module exports, and U.S. AC-side installations to estimate global module demand, and uses spot prices and input costs to estimate cash gross margin, unit gross profit, and EBITDA margin at each stage. Company target prices mainly use 2027E EV/EBITDA multiples discounted back to 2026E.
Methodology notes
Monthly tracking of supply and demand, inventory, spot prices, input costs, and cash profitability
The framework observes supply-demand and inventory dynamics by sub-sector and uses spot prices and input costs to infer trends in cash gross profit and EBITDA margins for the relevant stages of covered companies.
Aggregation of China installations implied module demand, China module export volumes, and U.S. AC-side installations implied module demand
The report synthesizes global module demand using three categories of indicators, noting that global module demand was 33GW in April 2026 and 156GW in 4M26, significantly below the full-year forecast path.
Using spot prices and input costs to derive cash gross margin and unit gross profit
The report notes that this estimation does not include company-level price discounts or premiums and may also differ from actual company operating results due to specific factory shutdown or maintenance schedules.
2027E EV/EBITDA multiples discounted to 2026E
Maxwell’s target price is based on 22x 2027E EV/EBITDA discounted at an 8.3% cost of equity; Hangzhou First is based on 13x discounted at 10.5%; Longi is based on 11x discounted at 11.3%.
Comparative percentile analysis of growth, financial returns, valuation multiples, and composite ranking
This framework uses metrics such as sales, EBITDA, and EPS growth, ROE, ROCE, CROCI, and P/E, P/B, EV/EBITDA to compare stocks against the market and industry peers by percentile.
Asset mapping & comparison
Structured mapping from thesis to named assets (strengths, weaknesses, peers, risks).
- MaxwellPreferred name within the coverage universe
- Strengths
- Benefits from new application opportunities, with the target price using a combined EV/EBITDA valuation for the core business and new application orders.
- Weaknesses
- If demand for new applications falls short of expectations, willingness for experimental capital expenditure may weaken.
- Comparison
- Listed as one of Goldman Sachs’ priority preferred companies within its coverage universe.
- Risks
- Cancellation of new application orders, tighter solar equipment export controls, and slower-than-expected development in the semiconductor industry.
- Hangzhou FirstPreferred name within the coverage universe
- Strengths
- Benefits from solar film price increases and unit-profit expansion potential, while also having the possibility to expand into high-end non-PV businesses such as AI-PCB and solid-state battery packaging.
- Weaknesses
- If PV installations come in below expectations, capacity utilization and film ASP may come under pressure.
- Comparison
- Compared with the glass segment facing pricing pressure, Goldman Sachs places greater value on its film pricing and unit-profit elasticity.
- Risks
- Installations below expectations, slower-than-expected capacity expansion, slower-than-expected development of high-end non-PV businesses, and intensified procurement pressure for raw materials such as resin.
- LongiPreferred name within the coverage universe
- Strengths
- Has energy storage potential; declining upstream prices support EBITDA resilience, and BC technology may provide medium-cycle upside.
- Weaknesses
- Profit improvement still depends on progress in cost-reduction technologies and the pace of BC development.
- Comparison
- In a weak demand environment, Goldman Sachs believes it is relatively more resilient.
- Risks
- If demand exceeds expectations alongside strong execution of supply-side policies, Poly/Glass prices may rebound more strongly than expected; progress in cost-reduction technologies may be slower than expected; BC development may be slower than expected.
- Daqo ADR/ACautious Rod Poly name
- Strengths
- The report does not disclose clear advantages.
- Weaknesses
- The Rod Poly segment faces potential supply increases and downside pricing pressure.
- Comparison
- Goldman Sachs describes Daqo ADR/A as Neutral/Sell.
- Risks
- Deterioration in upstream supply and demand, potential Poly supply increase in June, and continued price pressure from lower module costs.
- TongweiCautious Rod Poly name
- Strengths
- The report does not disclose clear advantages.
- Weaknesses
- Its polysilicon-related business falls within Goldman Sachs’ cautious coverage scope.
- Comparison
- Goldman Sachs describes Tongwei as Sell.
- Risks
- Supply increases, falling prices, and demand weaker than expected.
- Flat A/HCautious photovoltaic glass name
- Strengths
- The report does not disclose clear advantages.
- Weaknesses
- Glass prices fell 7% MTD in May, cash profitability fell 10 percentage points, and inventory increased to 57 days.
- Comparison
- Goldman Sachs describes Flat A/H as Sell.
- Risks
- Continued accumulation of glass inventory, further price declines, and module demand weaker than expected.
- Module segmentIndustry chain segment with improving profitability
- Strengths
- Easing material prices drove a 2-percentage-point improvement in profitability MTD in May.
- Weaknesses
- Order visibility is weak, and demand has declined significantly.
- Comparison
- Compared with the glass segment, modules showed a more obvious short-term profitability improvement.
- Risks
- Further weakness in upstream prices and the adoption of low-cost metallization technology may put pressure on module pricing.
- Photovoltaic glass segmentIndustry chain segment with deteriorating profitability
- Strengths
- The report does not disclose clear advantages.
- Weaknesses
- Price declines, inventory accumulation, and falling profitability occurred simultaneously.
- Comparison
- Compared with the module segment, glass was the segment with more pronounced profitability deterioration in May.
- Risks
- Continued inventory accumulation, continued price declines, and a slower-than-expected demand recovery.
Key data
- May prices along the main chainBroadly flatTrading was slow, mainly affected by weak price expectations and insufficient module order visibility.
- Photovoltaic glass priceDown 7% MTD in MayThe report attributes this to continued inventory accumulation.
- Film priceDown 6% MTD in MayThe report attributes this to an 11% MTD decline in oil prices in May.
- Glass inventoryUp 8% to 57 daysInventory build is a key reason for the decline in glass prices and profitability.
- Module profitabilityImproved 2 percentage points MTD in MayMainly driven by easing material prices.
- Glass profitabilityDown 10 percentage points MTD in MayMainly dragged down by falling glass prices.
- Global module demand in April 202633GW, down 58% year over year and down 30% month over monthThis weighed on 4M26 demand performance and was below Goldman Sachs’ FY26 forecast path.
- Global module demand in 4M26156GW, down 30% year over yearBelow Goldman Sachs’ FY26 forecast path of a 12% year-over-year decline.
- China installations in April 20269.5GW, down 79% year over yearMarch was down 56% year over year to 8.9GW; 4M26 China installations were down 51% year over year to 51GW.
- China module exports in April 202618GW, down 16% year over year4M26 exports fell 2% year over year to 83GW, weakening from 3M26's 3% year-over-year growth.
- Regional demand month-over-month changesAsia-Pacific -56%, Africa -50%, Middle East -39%, European Union -26%The report notes that export demand weakened month over month across multiple regions.
- Maxwell target priceRmb278Based on 22x 2027E EV/EBITDA, discounted back to 2026E at an 8.3% cost of equity.
- Hangzhou First target priceRmb21Based on 13x 2027E EV/EBITDA, discounted back to 2026E at 10.5%.
- Longi target priceRmb26Based on 11x 2027E EV/EBITDA, discounted back to 2026E at 11.3%.
Impact & implications
The implication for the industry chain is that short-term price stabilization does not mean the industry profitability inflection point has been confirmed. The module segment may benefit temporarily from falling upstream prices, but weak demand, rising inventories, and declining costs will also suppress end-market price expectations; segments such as glass and film are more directly exposed to inventory, raw material, and pricing pressures. From an investment perspective, the preference is for stocks with new applications, unit-profit expansion, or cost resilience, rather than segments facing greater supply pressure or still-declining prices.
Risks
- Potential Poly supply may increase in June, which could further worsen upstream supply and demand.
- Module production costs are declining due to softer upstream prices and Tier 1 manufacturers adopting low-cost metallization technology, which may create downside pricing pressure.
- Global module demand is significantly below the full-year forecast path, especially with China installations falling sharply year over year.
- Glass inventory has built up to 57 days, continuing to weigh on prices and profitability.
- Company-level price discounts, premiums, as well as factory shutdowns or maintenance may cause spot price-implied profitability to deviate from actual results.
- Maxwell faces risks from insufficient demand for new applications, order cancellations, tighter export controls, and slower-than-expected progress in the semiconductor industry.
- Hangzhou First faces risks from installations below expectations, slower-than-expected capacity expansion, slower-than-expected progress in high-end non-PV businesses, and raw material procurement pressure.
- Longi faces risks from stronger-than-expected rebounds in Poly/Glass prices, slower-than-expected progress in cost-reduction technologies, and slower-than-expected BC development.
What to watch
- Whether Poly supply increases in June and whether upstream supply and demand deteriorate further.
- Whether module order visibility and end-market price expectations improve.
- Whether glass inventory days fall from 57 days and whether glass prices continue to decline.
- The pace of adoption of low-cost metallization technology by Tier 1 manufacturers and its impact on module production costs and pricing.
- Subsequent changes in implied demand from China installations, module exports, and U.S. AC-side installations.
- Whether Hangzhou First’s film prices and unit profitability continue to expand.
- Whether Longi’s energy storage business and BC technology progress are delivered.
- Changes in Maxwell’s new application orders and the export control environment.