Quick Summary
Covering the latest research from top Wall Street investment banks

China’s April Manufacturing PMI Was Stronger Than Expected, with Production and Export Orders Recovering

Institution
JPMorgan
Date
2026-04-30
Authors
Tingting Ge, Feng Zhu, Jiayi Li, Tongfang Yuan
Company
-
Ticker
CHINA, 506551
Industry
Capital Markets, Chemicals, AR, Specialty Retail, manufacturing, macroeconomy
Rating
-
NeutralLow confidenceApril manufacturing PMI readings were stronger than expected, with production and export orders improving, although services, construction and employment remained soft.
AuthorsTingting Ge, Feng Zhu, Jiayi Li, Tongfang Yuan
CoverageAsia-Pacific
Business segmentsmanufacturing、services、construction、high-tech manufacturing、equipment manufacturing、consumer goods、high energy-consuming industries
Research firm divisions/subsidiariesJPMorgan(Other)、JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., Hong Kong Branch(Other)

AI summary card

China’s April Manufacturing PMI Was Stronger Than Expected, with Production and Export Orders Recovering

JPMorgan believes both manufacturing PMI readings in April were better than expected, indicating that growth momentum at the start of 2Q was stronger than previous concerns suggested, but price pressure, weak employment, and weaker services and construction still warrant attention.

Macro research report, with no single-stock rating, target price, or expected upside.
Macro ResearchChina Manufacturing PMIExport Order RecoveryCost PressureFront-Loaded Policy Support
  • The NBS manufacturing PMI was 50.3, above both J.P. Morgan’s and consensus expectations of 50.1, and remained in modest expansion territory.
  • The RatingDog PMI rose to 52.2, up 1.4 points from March, above J.P. Morgan’s expectation of 50.5 and consensus expectation of 51.0, reaching the highest level since 2021.
  • Production expansion continued to outpace domestic demand, with the NBS output PMI rising to 51.5, the RatingDog output PMI rising to 53.8, and export orders recovering after the decline in March.
  • Middle East tensions and supply-chain disruptions kept input prices elevated, with the NBS input price PMI at 63.7 and RatingDog at 57.5, increasing pass-through pressure to output prices.
  • Services and construction weakened, the non-manufacturing PMI declined, and the employment sub-index remained soft, showing that the growth recovery has not clearly transmitted to the labor market.

Report interpretation

Overview

This report analyzes China’s April manufacturing PMI performance. JPMorgan points out that both the NBS and RatingDog manufacturing PMIs were stronger than expected, with improvements in production, export orders, and future output expectations, indicating a strong start to growth momentum in 2Q. However, services and construction cooled, the employment sub-index remained in contraction territory, and the structural feature of manufacturing production being stronger than domestic demand still persists.

Core views

The core view is that manufacturing activity in April was stronger than expected, mainly driven by production expansion, recovery in export orders, and corporate inventory restocking; however, demand recovery was uneven and labor-market improvement was limited. Cost-side pressure remained high, with input prices near multi-year highs and pushing output prices upward. On the policy front, the April Politburo statement was slightly cautious, and macro policy continued to be front-loaded. Of this, 1851 hundred million yuan of funding for equipment upgrades under the “Two New” program has already been allocated this year, accounting for 92% of the full-year plan of 2000 hundred million yuan, and is expected to continue supporting investment.

Analysis framework

The report mainly compares the headline indices and sub-index changes of the NBS manufacturing PMI and the RatingDog PMI, and combines alternative data on port activity, industry sub-indices, enterprise-size sub-indices, and policy fund disbursement progress to assess manufacturing momentum, export recovery, price pressure, and the strength of policy support.

Methodology notes

  • macro_indicatorsPMI diffusion index

    PMI uses 50 as the dividing line between expansion and contraction, measuring changes in manufacturing conditions through the headline index and sub-indices such as output, new orders, export orders, prices, and employment.

    This report cross-validates the NBS and RatingDog PMIs, focusing on the marginal changes in April versus March and whether they exceeded market and J.P. Morgan expectations.

  • policy_trackingfront-loaded policy support

    Front-loaded policy support

    The report uses the disbursement progress of the NDRC’s second batch of 2026 “Two New” equipment-upgrade funding to measure the strength of policy support and assess its support for subsequent investment.

  • alternative_dataport activity tracking

    Alternative data on port activity

    The report uses the recovery in outbound container and bulk shipping volumes to corroborate the recovery in export orders after their notable decline in March.

Asset mapping & comparison

Structured mapping from thesis to named assets (strengths, weaknesses, peers, risks).

  • China macro growth
    Directly related
    Strengths
    Manufacturing PMI was stronger than expected, export orders recovered, and policy funding was front-loaded, supporting 2Q growth momentum.
    Weaknesses
    Services and construction turned weaker, the employment sub-index remained soft, and production was stronger than domestic demand.
    Comparison
    The increase in the RatingDog PMI was notably stronger than that of the NBS PMI, indicating stronger manufacturing improvement under a private-sector/market-oriented gauge.
    Risks
    Energy shocks, tariff uncertainty, and fluctuations in external demand may weaken subsequent growth.
  • Manufacturing sector
    Directly related
    Strengths
    Output, new orders, export orders, and future output expectations improved, while high-tech and equipment manufacturing PMIs strengthened further.
    Weaknesses
    High energy-consuming industries fell to 47.9, and production and demand in petroleum/coal processing and chemicals were in contraction.
    Comparison
    High-tech and equipment manufacturing performed better than consumer goods and high energy-consuming industries.
    Risks
    Elevated costs, logistics disruptions, and material shortages may compress profits and affect production continuity.
  • Export-linked activity
    Positively related
    Strengths
    Both NBS and RatingDog export orders rebounded, and alternative port data also showed container and bulk shipping volumes recovering after their March decline.
    Weaknesses
    The recovery in export orders still needs continued monitoring and may be affected by tariff uncertainty.
    Comparison
    Export orders improved significantly in April compared with February and March, with NBS export orders rising back above 50.
    Risks
    A slowdown in external demand, trade frictions, and changes in tariff policies may cause volatility.
  • Services and construction
    Negative comparison
    Strengths
    The services expectations index improved to 55.4, and construction expectations remained at 50.5.
    Weaknesses
    Services activity fell to 49.6 and construction activity fell to 48.0, both indicating cooling in actual activity.
    Comparison
    Non-manufacturing was clearly weaker than manufacturing, showing that the economic recovery was uneven.
    Risks
    If services and construction continue to contract, they may drag on employment and domestic demand.

Key data

  • NBS Manufacturing PMI50.3April reading; March was 50.4, while both J.P. Morgan and consensus expectations were 50.1.
  • RatingDog PMI52.2Up 1.4 points in April from March; J.P. Morgan expected 50.5, and consensus expected 51.0.
  • NBS Output PMI51.5Up 0.1 point in April from March, showing continued production expansion.
  • RatingDog Output PMI53.8Up sharply by about 3.1 points in April from March, showing a clear improvement in output.
  • NBS New Export Orders PMI50.3Up 1.2 points in April from March, returning to expansion territory.
  • RatingDog New Export Orders PMI51.1Up 0.7 point in April from March.
  • NBS Input Prices PMI63.7Still at an elevated level, only slightly down from 63.9 in March.
  • RatingDog Input Prices PMI57.5Continued to rise in April, showing that cost pressure remained strong.
  • NBS Non-Manufacturing PMI49.4Declined in April from 50.1 in March to contraction territory, with services and construction weakening.
  • “Two New” Equipment-Upgrade Funding1851 hundred million yuanAmount allocated so far in 2026, accounting for 92% of the full-year plan of 2000 hundred million yuan; the second batch was 915 hundred million yuan.
  • Estimated Investment LeveragedMore than 3800 hundred million yuanThe funding supports more than 6700 projects across 16 industries.

Impact & implications

The April PMI suggests that China’s start to 2Q may be stronger than earlier concerns over energy shocks and tariff uncertainty implied. The recovery in manufacturing production and exports provides support for short-term growth, and front-loaded policy disbursement is also expected to sustain investment resilience. However, the demand structure remains uneven, services and construction have weakened, the employment sub-index is soft, and cost pressure persists, meaning there is still uncertainty around growth quality and margin pass-through.

Risks

  • Continued energy shocks and Middle East tensions may keep pushing up input costs.
  • Tariff uncertainty may affect export orders and corporate production arrangements.
  • Production expansion is faster than domestic demand; if end demand is insufficient, inventory and profit pressure may intensify.
  • The employment PMI remains in contraction territory, indicating limited transmission from manufacturing improvement to the labor market.
  • Weakening services and construction may reduce the breadth of the overall economic recovery.

What to watch

  • Whether the NBS and RatingDog PMIs in May and June continue to stay above 50.
  • Whether new export orders can extend the April recovery and be corroborated by port activity and actual export data.
  • Whether input prices and output prices continue to run at elevated levels, and their impact on corporate profit margins.
  • Project starts, equipment investment, and related industry order performance after the “Two New” equipment-upgrade funding is implemented.
  • Whether services, construction, and employment PMIs rebound from contraction territory.
  • Whether the divergence in conditions between high-tech and equipment manufacturing and high energy-consuming industries widens.
Zhejiang ICP No. 2022035445-5
Disclaimer: Market data, charts, indicators, research views, and other information provided on this website are intended solely for information display, research communication, and educational reference. They should not be regarded as personalized investment advice, securities recommendations, trading instructions, solicitations, or guarantees of return. While we strive to improve the reliability of our data and content, such information may still be subject to delays, errors, incompleteness, or untimely updates due to source differences, methodological limitations, system processing, or market volatility. Users should exercise independent judgment based on their own circumstances and bear all risks and responsibilities arising from the use of this website.

Settings

Sign in to view recent logins