Quick Summary
Covering the latest research from top Wall Street investment banks

Goldman Sachs removes its forecast for a 2026 policy rate cut in China, still sees room for an RRR cut

Institution
Goldman Sachs
Date
2026-04-01
Authors
Xinquan Chen
Company
-
Ticker
-
Industry
Banking
Rating
-
NeutralLow confidenceThe report argues that at the first-quarter Monetary Policy Committee meeting, the People's Bank of China reiterated an accommodative stance but placed greater emphasis on calibration, targeted support, and lowering financing-related costs. Combined with better-than-expected activity data in January-February, China's relative resilience to the Hormuz disruption, and the potential for March PPI to turn positive, there is no clear catalyst for a 2026 policy rate cut.
AuthorsXinquan Chen
Asset classesFixed Income
Business segmentsMonetary policy、Liquidity、Policy rates、Reserve requirement ratio
Research firm divisions/subsidiariesGoldman Sachs(Other)、Goldman Sachs (Asia) L.L.C.(Other)

AI summary card

Goldman Sachs removes its forecast for a 2026 policy rate cut in China, still sees room for an RRR cut

The People's Bank of China kept an accommodative stance at the first-quarter Monetary Policy Committee meeting, but Goldman Sachs believes policy is leaning more toward calibration and targeted support, reducing the need for a 2026 rate cut.

No single-stock rating is involved; the macro view shifts from a forecast of a 10 bp rate cut in 2026 to no rate cut in 2026, while retaining the 50 bp RRR cut forecast.
China monetary policyPBOCRate cut forecast revised downRRR cutLiquidity supportStructural tools
  • At the first-quarter Monetary Policy Committee meeting on March 26, the People's Bank of China reiterated an accommodative stance, but stressed that the scale, pace, and timing of policy moves need careful calibration.
  • Goldman Sachs removed its prior base-case forecast for a 10 bp policy rate cut in the third quarter of 2026, citing economic data and policy communication that both suggest limited urgency for further easing.
  • The report still maintains its forecast for a 50 bp RRR cut, viewing it as a high-visibility tool to support liquidity and complement fiscal easing.
  • If the Hormuz disruption persists and leads to a global slowdown that weighs on China's exports, a policy rate cut could still reappear under a downside scenario.

Report interpretation

Overview

This report interprets the first-quarter Monetary Policy Committee statement from the People's Bank of China. Goldman Sachs believes the meeting maintained an accommodative tone, but the wording indicates that policy is placing more emphasis on prudent calibration, targeted credit support, and lowering financing-related costs rather than directly cutting policy rates. Based on better-than-expected recent economic activity data in China, relatively strong resilience to external shocks, and the possibility that PPI may turn positive, the report removes policy rate cuts in 2026 from its base case.

Core views

The key views are: first, the PBOC remains within an accommodative framework, but is leaning more toward structural tools and targeted support; second, stronger emphasis on financing costs suggests the central bank is more cautious about cutting policy rates; third, there is no clear catalyst for a rate cut in 2026, and Goldman Sachs has removed its prior forecast for a 10 bp cut in the third quarter; fourth, an RRR cut remains an important option for supporting liquidity and fiscal easing, while the central bank can also use OMO, MLF, outright reverse repos, and government bond purchases to keep liquidity ample.

Analysis framework

The report assesses policy communication changes and their impact on the rate path by comparing the first-quarter Monetary Policy Committee statement, the fourth-quarter monetary policy implementation report, and recent macro data. The analysis focuses on policy wording, structural monetary policy tools, financing cost language, January-February economic activity, the relative impact of the Hormuz disruption on China, and PMI signals for PPI.

Methodology notes

  • Macro policy analysisPolicy communication and data-dependence framework

    Use central bank meeting wording and recent macro data to infer the policy rate path

    If policy communication emphasizes calibration and targeted support while growth and inflation data improve, the need for policy rate cuts declines.

  • Liquidity tool analysisRRR cut versus open market tools comparison

    Differentiate high-visibility RRR cuts from other liquidity injection tools

    An RRR cut can complement fiscal easing and send a policy signal, but OMO, MLF, outright reverse repos, and government bond purchases can also keep liquidity ample.

Asset mapping & comparison

Structured mapping from thesis to named assets (strengths, weaknesses, peers, risks).

  • China rates market
    Directly affected by the PBOC policy rate and liquidity tools
    Strengths
    If liquidity remains abundant, short-end rates still have policy support.
    Weaknesses
    Removing the rate cut forecast weakens the base-case support for further downside in policy rates.
    Comparison
    Compared with direct rate cuts, RRR cuts and liquidity tools may have a more quantity-based and structural impact on the yield curve.
    Risks
    If growth weakens materially or external shocks intensify, rate cut expectations could re-emerge.
  • China banking system
    Affected by RRR cuts, financing costs, and structural credit support
    Strengths
    RRR cuts help release long-term funding and support credit extension.
    Weaknesses
    If policy focuses more on lowering financing costs, bank net interest margins may remain under pressure.
    Comparison
    Structural tools are more targeted toward specific sectors than broad-based rate cuts.
    Risks
    An economic slowdown or weaker exports could raise credit risk and alter the policy path.
  • China government bonds
    Affected by rate cut expectations, liquidity, and the central bank's government bond purchase tool
    Strengths
    Ample liquidity and potential government bond purchases can provide support.
    Weaknesses
    Lower rate-cut expectations may limit further downside in yields.
    Comparison
    The signaling effect of an RRR cut on the bond market is usually weaker than a direct policy rate cut.
    Risks
    If PPI turns positive and growth resilience continues, the room for bond yields to decline may be limited.

Key data

  • Q1 MPC meeting date2026-03-26The statement was released on 2026-03-31.
  • Removed rate cut forecast10bpThe previous forecast was for a 10 bp policy rate cut in the third quarter of 2026.
  • Retained RRR cut forecast50bpGoldman Sachs still sees an RRR cut as a tool to support liquidity and fiscal easing.
  • Policy backdropActivity data in January-February beat expectations, and March PPI may turn positiveThese factors reduce the near-term need for further rate cuts.

Impact & implications

For markets, the report implies that China's policy rate downside in 2026 may be smaller than previously expected, and expectations for the yield curve and financing costs will need stronger data weakening or external shocks to reprice rate cut expectations. For macro assets, liquidity may remain ample, but policy support is more likely to come through RRR cuts, structural tools, and open market operations.

Risks

  • If the Hormuz disruption persists and triggers a global economic slowdown, it could weigh on China's exports and reintroduce the case for rate cuts.
  • If subsequent economic activity data weaken materially, the current base case of no rate cut may need to be revised.
  • The central bank may rely more on OMO, MLF, outright reverse repos, or government bond purchases, reducing the certainty of an RRR cut as the sole tool.
  • Changes in policy communication may cause volatility in market pricing of the rate path.

What to watch

  • Whether subsequent PBOC monetary policy implementation reports and MPC statements continue to emphasize calibration and targeted support.
  • Whether activity data after January-February can sustain the stronger-than-expected growth momentum.
  • Whether March and later PPI readings turn positive and keep improving, as PMI signals suggest.
  • The impact of the Hormuz disruption on global growth, China's exports, and policy responses.
  • The actual pace of use of tools such as RRR cuts, OMO, MLF, outright reverse repos, and government bond purchases.
Zhejiang ICP No. 2022035445-5
Disclaimer: Market data, charts, indicators, research views, and other information provided on this website are intended solely for information display, research communication, and educational reference. They should not be regarded as personalized investment advice, securities recommendations, trading instructions, solicitations, or guarantees of return. While we strive to improve the reliability of our data and content, such information may still be subject to delays, errors, incompleteness, or untimely updates due to source differences, methodological limitations, system processing, or market volatility. Users should exercise independent judgment based on their own circumstances and bear all risks and responsibilities arising from the use of this website.

Settings

Sign in to view recent logins