Quick Summary
Covering the latest research from top Wall Street investment banks

Samsung Electronics labor-management settlement finalized, strike shadow largely lifted, J.P. Morgan maintains overweight

Institution
J.P. Morgan
Date
2026-05-21
Authors
Jay Kwon AC; Sangsik Lee; Neelay Y Kamath
Company
Samsung Electronics
Ticker
005930.KS
Industry
Semiconductors
Rating
Overweight
BullishHigh confidenceThe labor-management settlement has essentially removed the strike overhang, and together with the continued memory upcycle and a valuation shift to mid-cycle P/E, the report continues to recommend buying on dips.
AuthorsJay Kwon AC; Sangsik Lee; Neelay Y Kamath
Target priceW480,000
CoverageAsia-Pacific
Asset classesEquity
Business segmentsDS division、DX division、CSS business、DRAM、NAND、HBM
Research firm divisions/subsidiariesJ.P. Morgan(Other)、J.P. Morgan Securities (Far East) Limited, Seoul Branch(Other)、J.P. Morgan India Private Limited(Other)

AI summary card

Samsung Electronics labor-management settlement finalized, strike shadow largely lifted, J.P. Morgan maintains overweight

J.P. Morgan believes Samsung Electronics' labor-management settlement is an event that clears a stock-price overhang, with the shares likely to catch up to global memory peers in the near term and to remain a buy-on-dips idea amid a "higher for longer" memory upcycle.

Rating: Overweight; target price: W480,000; current price: W274,000; core view: easing strike risk and the memory upcycle support stock-price catch-up.
SemiconductorsMemory cycleLabor-management settlementHBMOverweight
  • Samsung Electronics management and the labor union reached a settlement under mediation by the Korea National Labor Relations Commission. The NSEU will vote from May 22 to May 27, and the general strike originally scheduled for May 21 to June 8 has been suspended.
  • The settlement includes incentives of up to 12% of operating profit for the DS division, above J.P. Morgan's baseline assumption of 10%, which could create downside risk to FY26E EPS; however, the report still believes full-year earnings have more upside relative to consensus.
  • The report argues that the recent strength in memory prices is mainly driven by tighter industry supply and demand rather than strike disruptions. It expects Korean memory makers' 2Q26E DRAM/NAND blended ASP to rise 55%-60% q-q, then 8%-10% in 3Q26E and 4%-6% in 4Q26E.
  • The report maintains an Overweight rating on Samsung Electronics and a Dec-26 target price of W480,000. At the current price of W274,000, that implies about 75% upside potential.

Report interpretation

Overview

This report focuses on the impact of Samsung Electronics' labor-management settlement on the share price, earnings, and supply-demand conditions in the memory industry. J.P. Morgan believes the settlement reached by management and the National Samsung Electronics Union materially reduces strike uncertainty and is an event that clears a stock-price overhang. Although the incentive plan may raise labor costs and create downside risk to FY26E EPS, the report emphasizes that the memory industry fundamentals remain strong, and Samsung Electronics' underperformance versus global memory peers creates near-term catch-up potential.

Core views

The core view is to maintain an Overweight rating and continue to buy on dips. The report believes Samsung Electronics' profit growth cycle is re-accelerating as traditional memory fundamentals improve. While it remains cautious on HBM execution and the restoration of Samsung's technological moat, improving HBM qualification progress, better industry supply-demand conditions, and the broadening of AI-server-related CPU and memory demand all support the share price in the near to medium term. More evidence that the company's technology leadership has been restored is still needed for the stock to become more compelling on fundamentals.

Analysis framework

The analytical framework has three parts: first, assess how the settlement terms and voting timetable affect strike risk and market sentiment; second, evaluate the potential impact of the added incentive costs, RSU accounting treatment, and profit-sharing mechanism on FY26E earnings estimates; third, compare Samsung Electronics with global memory peers, the KOSPI, and the memory supply-demand cycle to gauge catch-up and valuation re-rating potential.

Methodology notes

  • Valuation methodsmid-cycle P/E valuation

    Mid-cycle P/E valuation

    The W480,000 target price is based on an 8x mid-cycle P/E applied to FY26E-27E EPS. The report says this method replaces the long-used traditional P/B approach to reflect a longer memory upcycle, better earnings visibility, and improved shareholder returns.

  • industry_cyclememory supply-demand cycle

    Memory supply-demand cycle

    The report treats DRAM/NAND contract prices, wafer starts, AI-server demand, and peer capacity expansion as the core variables for assessing industry conditions, and it believes price strength is mainly driven by tighter memory supply and demand.

Asset mapping & comparison

Structured mapping from thesis to named assets (strengths, weaknesses, peers, risks).

  • Samsung Electronics (005930.KS)
    Core coverage name; the report maintains an Overweight rating and recommends buying on dips.
    Strengths
    The labor-management settlement removes a short-term overhang; traditional memory fundamentals are improving; memory prices are strong; HBM qualification progress supports the share price in the near to medium term; the target price implies substantial upside.
    Weaknesses
    Evidence that Samsung's HBM technological moat has been restored is still insufficient; added incentive costs may pressure FY26E EPS; the RSU-related accounting treatment remains unclear.
    Comparison
    Since early April, SEC shares have risen 49%, less than global memory peers' 109% but more than the KOSPI's 32%; the report sees catch-up trade potential versus peers.
    Risks
    A prolonged memory downcycle, weaker-than-expected HBM demand from ASIC customers, delays in future HBM qualification for new product generations, and slower-than-expected mobile shipment growth.

Key data

  • Current priceW274,000Price date is May 20, 2026.
  • Target priceW480,000Dec-26 target price, based on 8x FY26E-27E P/E.
  • Potential upside75.2%Calculated from the target price of W480,000 relative to the current price of W274,000.
  • DS division incentive poolUp to 12% of DS division OPAbove J.P. Morgan's baseline assumption of 10%, which may pressure FY26E EPS.
  • Union voting window2026-05-22 to 2026-05-27If majority support is not obtained, additional mediation may be needed and uncertainty could rise again.
  • 2Q26E DRAM/NAND blended ASP assumption+55%-60% q-q3Q26E is then expected to rise by +8%-10%, and 4Q26E by +4%-6%.
  • Stock price relative performanceSEC +49% vs memory peers +109% vs KOSPI +32%Since early April, the report believes there is still catch-up trade room versus memory peers.

Impact & implications

In the short term, the settlement helps remove strike risk, improve investor sentiment, and drive Samsung Electronics to catch up relative to global memory peers. On earnings, the 12% DS profit-sharing arrangement and the accounting treatment of RSU incentives may still create cost and EPS pressure, but the report believes the key drivers are stronger memory prices and broader industry demand. Over the medium term, HBM4 ramp-up, long-term supply agreements with U.S. CSP customers, the GPU/ASIC product roadmap, AI-server-grade x86/ARM CPU demand, peer capacity expansion, and progress by Chinese competitors in DDR5 will together determine whether Samsung can further restore its technology premium and valuation appeal.

Risks

  • If the union vote does not receive majority support, additional mediation could be triggered and strike uncertainty could rise again.
  • The DS division incentive pool is above the baseline assumption, which may raise labor costs and create downside risk to FY26E EPS.
  • The accounting treatment for RSU incentive expense remains unclear and will need formal company clarification.
  • If memory prices enter a longer downcycle, the basis for the rating and target price would weaken.
  • Insufficient HBM demand, qualification progress, or evidence of technological leadership could weigh on valuation re-rating.
  • Slower-than-expected mobile shipment growth could affect earnings realization.

What to watch

  • The result of the NSEU settlement vote from May 22 to May 27.
  • The company's formal explanation of the new compensation plan and the RSU expense recognition method, which may be disclosed during the 2Q26 earnings call.
  • Progress on Vera Rubin HBM4 ramp, wallet share, and 2027E HBM ASP negotiations.
  • Updates to long-term supply agreements with major customers, especially U.S. CSP customers.
  • The 2027E-2028E GPU and ASIC product pipeline, specifications, and changes in HBM layer count/density.
  • Demand for AI-server-grade x86/ARM CPUs, especially driven by LPDDR5X SOCAMM demand.
  • Peer capacity expansion trends and technological progress by Chinese competitors in DDR5.
  • Updates to shareholder return policy over the next three years.
Zhejiang ICP No. 2022035445-5
Disclaimer: Market data, charts, indicators, research views, and other information provided on this website are intended solely for information display, research communication, and educational reference. They should not be regarded as personalized investment advice, securities recommendations, trading instructions, solicitations, or guarantees of return. While we strive to improve the reliability of our data and content, such information may still be subject to delays, errors, incompleteness, or untimely updates due to source differences, methodological limitations, system processing, or market volatility. Users should exercise independent judgment based on their own circumstances and bear all risks and responsibilities arising from the use of this website.

Settings

Sign in to view recent logins