Quick Summary
Covering the latest research from top Wall Street investment banks

Goldman Sachs expects solid Q2 performance for the ridesharing and delivery sector, while online grocery remains a low-penetration, high-growth opportunity

Institution
Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC
Date
2026-07-19
Authors
Eric Sheridan; Julia Fein-Ashley; Emma Huang
Company
Uber; DoorDash; Instacart; Lyft
Ticker
UBER; DASH; CART; LYFT
Industry
Americas Technology: Internet, Ridesharing & Delivery, Online Grocery
Rating
Buy for UBER, DASH, CART and LYFT
BullishLow confidenceThe report believes that second-quarter results for ridesharing and delivery are broadly in line with or above investor expectations, consumer demand remains relatively stable, and online grocery and local commerce still have long-term growth potential.
AuthorsEric Sheridan; Julia Fein-Ashley; Emma Huang
Target priceUBER $115; DASH $280; CART $64; LYFT $22
CoverageEurope、Other
Business segmentsRideshare、Food delivery、Online grocery、Local commerce、Autonomous vehicles、Robotaxi
Research firm divisions/subsidiariesGoldman Sachs & Co. LLC(Other)

AI summary card

Goldman Sachs expects solid Q2 performance for the ridesharing and delivery sector, while online grocery remains a low-penetration, high-growth opportunity

The report maintains Buy ratings on UBER, DASH, CART, and LYFT, believes consumer demand has not weakened materially, and expects the online grocery industry to achieve an approximately 11% CAGR from 2025 to 2030.

UBER Buy, price target $115, upside 59%; DASH Buy, price target $280, upside 52%; CART Buy, price target $64, upside 40%; LYFT Buy, price target $22, upside 42%.
RidesharingFood deliveryOnline groceryLocal commerceAutonomous drivingQ2 earnings previewBuy rating
  • Goldman Sachs expects second-quarter results for the ridesharing and delivery internet sub-sector to be broadly in line with or above investor expectations.
  • The U.S. online grocery industry remains at a low penetration stage, with sales expected to grow at a compound annual rate of about 11% from 2025 to 2030, reaching nearly $400 billion by 2030.
  • Delivery-based online grocery is seen as the main growth driver, with an expected 2025-2030 CAGR of about 16%, above shipped-to-home and pickup.
  • Near-term disruption concerns from autonomous driving have eased somewhat, and the report believes U.S. robotaxi supply remains constrained, so traditional ridesharing platforms may still carry autonomous mobility demand.
  • Goldman Sachs maintains Buy ratings on UBER, DASH, CART, and LYFT, but lowers CART’s price target from $66 to $64 and LYFT’s from $24 to $22.

Report interpretation

Overview

This is Goldman Sachs’ Q2 2026 earnings preview and industry update for the Americas internet ridesharing and delivery sector. The report focuses on four companies—UBER, DASH, CART, and LYFT—and analyzes consumer conditions, the competitive landscape in online grocery, the impact of autonomous driving, MAU and download share, NPS/NPI consumer feedback, company valuations, and price targets. The overall conclusion is positive: second-quarter results are expected to be solid, consumer demand has not shown clear deterioration, and online grocery and local commerce still offer long-term structural growth opportunities.

Core views

The core views include: first, second-quarter results for the ridesharing and delivery sector are expected to be broadly in line with or above market expectations, and investor concerns about consumer weakness have not yet been clearly reflected in trends at covered companies. Second, U.S. online grocery remains a low online-penetration category, and Goldman Sachs expects the industry to grow at an approximately 11% CAGR from 2025 to 2030, with the delivery channel at about 16%, serving as the main source of incremental growth. Third, concerns about the near-term impact of autonomous driving have declined; Waymo recalls and supply constraints mean traditional ridesharing platforms are still likely to play an important role in the near term, while Uber is positioning in autonomous driving through both internal capabilities and external partnerships. Fourth, at the company level Goldman Sachs continues to favor UBER, DASH, CART, and LYFT, all of which retain Buy ratings, though some price targets were cut due to adjustments in share count, valuation methodology, or expense assumptions.

Analysis framework

The report combines updated industry models, company operating estimates, third-party mobile app data, consumer feedback data, and valuation frameworks. In the industry section, U.S. online grocery is divided into three categories: shipped-to-home, same-day delivery, and pickup; in the trends section, SensorTower is used to observe MAU, download share, and regional mix; in the consumer preference section, HundredX’s NPS and NPI are used to measure willingness to recommend and future purchase intent; in the company section, Goldman Sachs estimates, consensus expectations, price target methodologies, and key risks are compared.

Methodology notes

  • industry_modelOnline Grocery Category Segmentation

    Dividing U.S. online grocery into shipped-to-home, delivery, and pickup

    The report uses a three-part framework to break down the sources of online grocery growth: shipped-to-home skews toward non-perishables and efficiency/price advantages, delivery emphasizes speed and convenience, and pickup relies on store fulfillment but is expected to have relatively lower growth going forward.

  • alternative_dataSensorTower MAU and Download Share

    Using third-party mobile app data to observe platform user and competitive trends

    The report emphasizes that these data may differ from company-reported metrics and are mainly used to identify growth-rate changes and share direction, rather than to precisely replace official operating indicators.

  • consumer_surveyHundredX NPS and NPI

    Using consumer willingness to recommend and future purchase intent to assess demand trends

    NPS measures users’ willingness to recommend, while NPI measures the gap between respondents expecting to use more versus less over the next 12 months; the report uses these metrics to judge whether consumer demand is stable and whether different income groups are diverging.

  • Valuation methods12-Month Price Target and Estimate Revision

    Providing 12-month price targets based on estimate revisions and valuation methodology

    The report updates operating assumptions, share count assumptions, gross margin assumptions, and expense assumptions for the covered companies, and accordingly maintains or adjusts price targets.

Asset mapping & comparison

Structured mapping from thesis to named assets (strengths, weaknesses, peers, risks).

  • UBER
    Core covered company, benefiting from platform opportunities in ridesharing, delivery, online grocery, and autonomous driving
    Strengths
    Leading global scale, international MAU growth faster than in the U.S., and autonomous driving partnerships plus internal capability building strengthen long-term optionality.
    Weaknesses
    MAU growth continued to slow in Q2’26, and U.K. accounting changes, gross margin assumptions, and capital expenditure assumptions require adjustment.
    Comparison
    Compared with Lyft, Uber is stronger in global download share and business diversification; compared with pure delivery platforms, Uber covers both mobility and delivery.
    Risks
    Slowing consumer demand, autonomous driving competition, regulatory changes, rising capital expenditures, and pressure on take rate/gross margin.
  • DASH
    Core covered company, benefiting from expansion in food delivery, online grocery, and local commerce
    Strengths
    Orders and gross bookings are expected to maintain relatively strong growth, online grocery and local commerce offer substantial expansion room, and Deliveroo and Wolt trends are improving.
    Weaknesses
    Core app MAU growth continues to slow, and regional mix changes affect take rate and gross margin assumptions.
    Comparison
    Compared with Instacart, DoorDash is broader in local commerce and delivery network; compared with Uber Eats, its U.S. local delivery ecosystem is more concentrated.
    Risks
    Intensifying competition, rising promotional investment, grocery delivery margin ramp falling short of expectations, and demand divergence among lower-income consumers.
  • CART
    A beneficiary with high exposure to online grocery
    Strengths
    Higher online grocery penetration and retailer digitization tools are expected to support long-term growth, and NPS has improved since January.
    Weaknesses
    Q2’26 app MAU declined 10% year over year, and the price target was lowered to $64 due to a share count assumption revision.
    Comparison
    Compared with UBER/DASH, Instacart is more concentrated in grocery; compared with Amazon/Walmart, its asset-light platform model differs but depends on retail partnerships.
    Risks
    Continued MAU decline, retailer markup or price-parity pressure, competitive investment, and order frequency and basket size falling short of expectations.
  • LYFT
    Ridesharing exposure in the U.S. and Canada
    Strengths
    Goldman Sachs still maintains a Buy rating, NPS has improved by 3-4 points since December 2025, and Canada MAU growth exceeded 30%.
    Weaknesses
    Q2’26 MAU declined 2% year over year, U.S. trends are weak, and the price target was lowered from $24 to $22.
    Comparison
    Compared with Uber, Lyft is more concentrated geographically and by business scope, with weaker global share and diversification.
    Risks
    Weak U.S. user growth, competitive pressure, changes in autonomous driving platforms, expense seasonality, and valuation methodology adjustment risk.

Key data

  • U.S. online grocery industry CAGR, 2025-2030+11%Goldman Sachs industry model forecast for the combined three online grocery channels.
  • Online grocery sales size in 2030Approximately $400 billionThe report says industry sales could approach this scale by 2030.
  • Shipped-to-home CAGR, 2025-2030+9%Driven by efficiency, price, and subscription-style repeat purchases.
  • Delivery-based online grocery CAGR, 2025-2030+16%The report believes delivery will contribute the majority of incremental growth.
  • Pickup CAGR, 2025-2030+4%Still faster than offline store grocery spending, but no longer the main growth driver.
  • Uber Q2’26 global MAU growth+7% YoYInternational market growth is about +10% YoY, continuing to outpace the U.S.
  • Lyft Q2’26 MAU growth-2% YoYU.S. performance is relatively weak, but Canada MAU grew by more than 30% during the quarter.
  • DoorDash Q2’26 app MAU growth+8% YoYCore app growth continues to slow, while Deliveroo and Wolt trends improved or remained at double-digit growth.
  • Instacart Q2’26 app MAU growth-10% YoYThe first sequential decline since Q4 2024, though channel checks still point to resilient demand.
  • Waymo app downloads over the past 12 months>4 millionThe report says Waymo reached a low double-digit percentage share of U.S. ridesharing downloads, though year-over-year download growth slowed.

Impact & implications

For investors, the report supports continued focus on the medium- to long-term growth elasticity of ridesharing, food delivery, and online grocery local commerce platforms. Low online grocery penetration, improved delivery speed, inventory digitization, subscriptions, and promotional activity may drive higher penetration and frequency. The short-term impact of autonomous driving on traditional platforms is viewed as limited, but investors still need to track Waymo’s new markets, Uber partnership expansion, and regulatory/recall risks. At the company level, UBER and DASH benefit from scale and multi-business advantages; CART stands to benefit from rising online grocery penetration but its MAU decline needs monitoring; LYFT’s upside comes from valuation and ridesharing recovery, though user trends are relatively weaker.

Risks

  • Consumer spending weakens further, especially if demand divergence among some low-income or lower-middle-income groups increases.
  • Competition in online grocery intensifies, with promotions, delivery subsidies, and price parity requirements compressing margins.
  • Autonomous driving robotaxi expansion is faster than expected, changing the supply-demand and pricing structure of traditional ridesharing platforms.
  • Recalls, regulation, or safety incidents involving Waymo or other autonomous driving operators affect the pace of industry development.
  • Third-party MAU, download share, and NPS/NPI data differ in methodology from company-reported metrics, which may lead to misjudgment of trends.
  • Changes in share count assumptions, accounting treatment, gross margin, take rate, capital expenditures, and operating expense assumptions affect price targets.

What to watch

  • Whether Q2 results from UBER, DASH, CART, and LYFT meet or exceed investor expectations.
  • Management commentary on consumer demand, lower-income cohorts, and order frequency during second-quarter earnings calls.
  • U.S. online grocery delivery penetration, order frequency, basket size, and progress on price parity.
  • Operational changes by Waymo in markets such as Denver, Las Vegas, San Diego, Tampa, Nashville, and Phoenix.
  • The commercialization pace of Uber’s autonomous driving partnerships with Nuro, Lucid, WeRide, and others.
  • Whether SensorTower MAU and download share continue to show slowing at Uber/DoorDash and pressure at Instacart/Lyft.
  • Whether HundredX NPS/NPI continues to support stable demand, especially differences across HHI income groups.
Zhejiang ICP No. 2022035445-5
Disclaimer: Market data, charts, indicators, research views, and other information provided on this website are intended solely for information display, research communication, and educational reference. They should not be regarded as personalized investment advice, securities recommendations, trading instructions, solicitations, or guarantees of return. While we strive to improve the reliability of our data and content, such information may still be subject to delays, errors, incompleteness, or untimely updates due to source differences, methodological limitations, system processing, or market volatility. Users should exercise independent judgment based on their own circumstances and bear all risks and responsibilities arising from the use of this website.

Settings

Sign in to view recent logins