Quick Summary
Covering the latest research from top Wall Street investment banks

Global equity and fixed income funds turned to net inflows simultaneously, with technology and memory themes still the focus of capital flows

Institution
Goldman Sachs
Date
2026-07-10
Authors
Lexi Kanter, Michael Cahill, Karen Reichgott Fishman, Stuart Jenkins
Company
-
Ticker
-
Industry
Information Technology Services
Rating
-
BullishLow confidenceThe report shows that global equity and fixed income funds both recorded net inflows, cross-border FX flows were broadly positive, reflecting supportive risk sentiment; at the same time, improved earnings-growth expectations in Korea and Taiwan supported by the memory supercycle helped, but volatility remains elevated.
AuthorsLexi Kanter, Michael Cahill, Karen Reichgott Fishman, Stuart Jenkins
CoverageEmerging Markets、Other
Asset classesFixed Income、FX
SubsidiariesGoldman Sachs & Co. LLC、Goldman Sachs International
Business segmentsGlobal Investment Research、G10 FX Strategy
Research firm divisions/subsidiariesGoldman Sachs(Other)

AI summary card

Global equity and fixed income funds turned to net inflows simultaneously, with technology and memory themes still the focus of capital flows

Goldman’s weekly fund-flow report shows global equity fund net inflows rebounding to +$56bn, fixed income fund flows remaining resilient, USD demand strongest and CNY the largest net outflow, with Korea and Taiwan equities supported by the memory supercycle but still volatile.

This report is macro and fund-flow research and does not provide single-stock ratings, target prices, or expected upside.
global fund flowsequity fund inflowsfixed income fundstechnology fundsKorea Taiwanmemory supercyclecross-border FXUSD demand
  • Global equity funds turned to net inflows for the week ended July 1, with net inflows of +$56bn, versus -$14bn in the prior week.
  • Within DM, net inflows were driven by US funds; within EM, net inflows were driven by Mainland China, Korea, and Taiwan funds.
  • Among sectors, technology funds saw the largest inflows; Korea and Taiwan fund flows improved materially this year, supported by memory-supercycle-related earnings-growth expectations.
  • Fixed income fund inflows remained supported, with short-duration bond funds, inflation-linked bond funds, EM hard-currency, and local-currency bond funds all showing net inflows.
  • Money market fund assets increased by $40bn; cross-border FX flows were broadly positive, with USD showing the strongest net demand and CNY the largest net outflow.

Report interpretation

Overview

This is a Goldman Sachs weekly global fund-flow report that tracks global fund flows around July 8, and focuses on changes in equity, fixed income, money market, and cross-border FX flows. The report titled "Memory Lane" has a core narrative of global equity funds returning to substantial net inflows, fixed income demand remaining robust, while Korea and Taiwan received funding support as earnings-growth expectations linked to the memory supercycle improved.

Core views

The core views of the report are: first, global equity fund flows shifted from net outflow in the prior week to clear net inflow, indicating improved risk appetite; second, DM equity flows are mainly driven by US funds, while EM flows are driven by Mainland China, Korea, and Taiwan; third, technology funds are the strongest direction for sector flows, and Korea and Taiwan fund inflows have risen materially this year, with the memory supercycle likely continuing to support related equities, though volatility remains elevated; fourth, fixed income funds are still receiving broad inflows, with short-duration, inflation-protection, and EM bonds all receiving support; fifth, cross-border FX flows show risk sentiment remains supported, with USD demand strongest and CNY showing the largest net outflow.

Analysis framework

The report uses a weekly fund-flow monitoring framework, breaking down capital flows by asset class, region, country, sector, and fund type, and combines cross-border equity and bond fund flows to infer FX demand direction. For equity flows, the report segments DM, EM, country/region-focused funds, and sector-focused funds; for fixed income flows, it segments duration, inflation-protection, EM hard-currency, and local-currency bond categories.

Methodology notes

  • fund_flow_analysisGlobal Fund Flow Monitoring

    Observe net subscriptions and redemptions by classifying funds by equities, fixed income, money market, and sector/country.

    This framework uses net inflows and net outflows to measure changes in investor allocation across different assets and regions, helping assess short-term risk appetite and thematic crowding.

  • cross_border_fx_flowCross-border FX Flow Estimation

    Use cross-border equity and fixed-income fund flows, measuring directional FX demand based on fund domicile.

    The report states that FX flows are based on cross-border equity and fixed-income flows using fund domicile of the underlying funds, and exclude EM hard-currency bond funds and FX-hedged products, making them closer to unhedged cross-border allocation-driven currency demand.

  • sector_theme_analysisSector-Focused Fund Flows

    Identify the strength of investment themes through flows into sector-focused funds.

    The report notes that stock funds recorded net inflows across all sectors, with technology funds receiving the largest inflows, and links improved Korea and Taiwan flows to earnings-growth expectations associated with the memory supercycle.

Asset mapping & comparison

Structured mapping from thesis to named assets (strengths, weaknesses, peers, risks).

  • Global equities
    Net inflows turned positive again
    Strengths
    Global equity funds recorded net inflows of +$56bn, indicating improved risk appetite.
    Weaknesses
    Fund flows are volatile on a weekly basis, with the previous week still showing -$14bn net outflows.
    Comparison
    Shifted from net outflow to large net inflow versus the prior week.
    Risks
    If risk appetite deteriorates, equity fund inflows could reverse quickly.
  • US equity funds
    Primary driver of DM equity net inflows
    Strengths
    Provided the main source of net inflow within DM.
    Weaknesses
    The report does not provide the exact US fund amount, so concentration risk cannot be fully assessed.
    Comparison
    US flows were more pronounced relative to other DM regions.
    Risks
    Changes in U.S. market valuations, rates, and earnings expectations could affect subsequent inflows.
  • Korea and Taiwan equities
    Supported by the memory supercycle
    Strengths
    Flows improved materially this year, and strategists expect the memory supercycle to continue providing support through strong earnings growth.
    Weaknesses
    The report explicitly notes elevated volatility.
    Comparison
    In EM, they jointly drove net inflows with Mainland China, with flow acceleration in Korea and Taiwan especially notable this year.
    Risks
    A reversal of the memory cycle, slower technology exports, or weaker risk appetite could reduce support.
  • Technology funds
    Largest sector flow destination
    Strengths
    Technology funds recorded the largest sector net inflow, reflecting a preference for technology and AI/memory-related themes.
    Weaknesses
    Rising sector concentration may increase crowding and trading risk.
    Comparison
    They were the strongest out of equity sector funds, which all had net inflows.
    Risks
    Disappointing earnings, valuation compression, or cooling of thematic flows could trigger withdrawals.
  • Global fixed income funds
    Inflows remain robust
    Strengths
    Short-duration bonds, inflation-protected bonds, and EM hard-currency and local-currency bonds all recorded net inflows.
    Weaknesses
    The report does not disclose the net inflow amounts for each fixed-income subcategory.
    Comparison
    Inflow occurred alongside equity funds, indicating relatively broad demand across assets.
    Risks
    Changes in the interest-rate path, inflation expectations, and credit risk may affect bond-fund flows.
  • USD
    Strongest cross-border FX net demand
    Strengths
    Shows the strongest net demand in cross-border FX flows.
    Weaknesses
    The report does not provide the exact scale of USD net demand.
    Comparison
    USD demand is stronger than for other currencies.
    Risks
    USD demand may shift if U.S. rate expectations or global risk appetite changes.
  • CNY
    Largest cross-border FX net outflow
    Strengths
    Can serve as a signal of pressure in cross-border allocation related to China.
    Weaknesses
    Flow direction is weak, indicating net outflow pressure on CNY.
    Comparison
    CNY had the largest net outflow among currencies covered in the report.
    Risks
    Persistent net outflows could increase pressure on exchange-rate and cross-border funding sentiment.

Key data

  • Weekly global equity fund net inflow+$56bnFor the week ended July 1, flow turned positive again, versus -$14bn in the prior week.
  • Previous week global equity fund net outflow-$14bnUsed as a benchmark against this week’s +$56bn net inflow.
  • Money market fund asset change+$40bnThe report says money market fund assets increased by $40bn.
  • Primary DM equity flow driverUS fundsNet inflows in DM were led by US funds.
  • Primary EM equity flow driverMainland China, Korea, Taiwan fundsNet inflows in EM were driven by funds from Mainland China, Korea, and Taiwan.
  • Strongest sector flow directionTechnology fundsStock sector funds recorded net inflows across all sectors, with technology funds seeing the largest inflow.
  • Currency with strongest FX net demandUSDCross-border FX flows show USD had the strongest net demand.
  • Currency with largest FX net outflowCNYCross-border FX flows show CNY had the largest net outflow.

Impact & implications

Fund flow data indicate that global investors’ willingness to allocate to risk assets has improved, with inflows to both equities and fixed income. Technology and the memory-storage chain remain funding focal points, which may continue to support equity market performance in Korea and Taiwan; however, the report also notes that volatility in those markets remains elevated. Continued inflows on the fixed-income side suggest investors still prioritize yield, defense, and duration-structure allocation. On the FX side, stronger USD demand relative to other currencies and large CNY outflows suggest that cross-border allocation shifts may continue to influence exchange-rate performance.

Risks

  • Although Korea and Taiwan equity markets are supported by the memory supercycle, the report notes that volatility remains elevated.
  • Weekly fund-flow data can be affected by short-term sentiment, rebalancing, and seasonality, and should not be interpreted as a long-term trend on its own.
  • The largest inflows into technology funds may create thematic crowding and valuation-volatility risks.
  • Cross-border FX flows show the largest CNY net outflow, which may reflect pressure on RMB-related asset allocation.
  • Fixed income fund flows remain sensitive to changes in interest rates, inflation expectations, and credit risk.

What to watch

  • Whether global equity fund net inflows continue, especially whether there is a retracement after the +$56bn figure.
  • Whether US funds continue to lead DM equity flows.
  • Whether inflows into Mainland China, Korea, and Taiwan funds persist, especially whether Korea and Taiwan remain supported by memory-cycle-related earnings.
  • Whether the strong inflows into technology funds diffuse into other sectors or begin to cool as crowding increases.
  • Whether the ongoing inflow pattern continues in short-duration bond, inflation-protected bond, and EM bond funds.
  • Whether USD net demand and CNY net outflow persist, and how this affects FX rates and cross-border risk appetite.
Zhejiang ICP No. 2022035445-5
Disclaimer: Market data, charts, indicators, research views, and other information provided on this website are intended solely for information display, research communication, and educational reference. They should not be regarded as personalized investment advice, securities recommendations, trading instructions, solicitations, or guarantees of return. While we strive to improve the reliability of our data and content, such information may still be subject to delays, errors, incompleteness, or untimely updates due to source differences, methodological limitations, system processing, or market volatility. Users should exercise independent judgment based on their own circumstances and bear all risks and responsibilities arising from the use of this website.

Settings

Sign in to view recent logins