Quick Summary
Covering the latest research from top Wall Street investment banks

Offshore insurance taxation rumors weigh on Hong Kong insurers’ valuations, but policy and implementation details remain unclear

Institution
Goldman Sachs
Date
2026-08-06
Authors
Thomas Wang, Simone Chen
Company
Prudential Plc / FWD Group Holdings / AIA Group
Ticker
2378.HK / PRU.L / 1828.HK / 1299.HK
Industry
Insurance
Rating
Prudential Plc: Buy; FWD Group Holdings: Buy; AIA Group: Buy
NeutralLow confidenceTaxation reports may compress the return advantage of Hong Kong insurance products relative to mainland products and dampen new business demand from Mainland Chinese visitors, creating near-term share price pressure; however, there has been no formal policy announcement yet, and the tax base and timing of collection vary across local tax authorities.
AuthorsThomas Wang, Simone Chen
Target pricePrudential Plc: HK$152 (2378.HK) / GBp1,430 (PRU.L); FWD Group Holdings: HK$42; AIA Group: HK$97
Business segmentsHong Kong life insurance、Mainland Chinese visitor business、Hong Kong local customer business、Participating insurance、Prepaid premium business
Research firm divisions/subsidiariesGoldman Sachs(Other)、Goldman Sachs (Asia) L.L.C.(Other)

AI summary card

Offshore insurance taxation rumors weigh on Hong Kong insurers’ valuations, but policy and implementation details remain unclear

If taxed at the 20% rate cited by media, Hong Kong insurance products would still have a return advantage, but the advantage would narrow significantly, and insurers with higher exposure to Mainland Chinese visitor business may remain under near-term share price pressure.

All three covered companies are rated Buy; 12-month target prices are Prudential Plc HK$152/GBp1,430, FWD Group Holdings HK$42, and AIA Group HK$97, respectively.
Hong Kong insuranceOffshore insurance taxMainland Chinese visitorsCapital flow regulationParticipating insuranceRegulatory uncertainty
  • Caixin reported that individual cases of taxation on income related to Hong Kong insurance have emerged in Beijing and Hangzhou, dating back as early as 2025, with the applicable tax rate reportedly at 20%.
  • There is currently no formal policy announcement, and provincial tax authorities also lack a unified approach to the tax base and timing of taxation.
  • Under a stress scenario in which a 20% tax is levied on all policy benefits, the return gap between Hong Kong products and mainland products could narrow from 2.5–3.0 percentage points to 1.3–1.7 percentage points.
  • Hong Kong business accounts for about 40%–50% of new business value and 36%–40% of embedded value for the covered insurers, indicating high sensitivity of earnings and valuation to the event.
  • The report maintains Buy ratings on Prudential Plc, FWD Group Holdings, and AIA Group, but sees near-term share price pressure before regulatory clarification.

Report interpretation

Overview

Media reports state that Mainland Chinese tax authorities have begun taxing income from Hong Kong insurance products held by some residents, involving interest credited to participating policies and deposit interest generated from prepaid premiums. The reports came shortly after the Ministry of Finance and the State Taxation Administration issued a notice on the administration of individual income tax on overseas trusts on July 24, 2026, but there has been no formal policy announcement on taxing Hong Kong insurance. The market is concerned that the event may signal a further tightening of capital outflow regulation and weaken Mainland Chinese visitors’ willingness to purchase Hong Kong policies.

Core views

The report does not judge the authenticity of the media reports or the final policy outcome. Even if implemented at the reported tax rate, Hong Kong insurance products are still expected to offer higher returns than mainland products, but their relative advantage would narrow significantly. Given the relatively high share of Mainland Chinese visitor business in Hong Kong insurers’ new business value and sales, regulatory uncertainty will create near-term share price pressure. A sustained rebound would require insurers to demonstrate resilient sales growth, and future earnings disclosures will be key to assessing the impact on demand.

Analysis framework

The report assesses the potential impact by combining media cases, illustrated return caps for Hong Kong and mainland participating products, a 20% tax-rate stress scenario, the contribution of Hong Kong business to new business value and embedded value, and the share of sales from offshore customers; stock-specific target prices use a FY27E price-to-embedded-value methodology.

Methodology notes

  • Scenario analysisOffshore insurance tax sensitivity analysis

    Compare the illustrated return advantage of Hong Kong products relative to mainland products before and after taxation

    The analysis uses the illustrated return caps of 6% for Hong Kong dollar participating products and 6.5% for non-Hong Kong dollar participating products, and the 3.5% cap for mainland products, as reference points, and assumes the 20% tax rate reported by media applies to all policy benefits. Actual outcomes still depend on whether the tax base is cash interest, non-cash interest, or surrender value, as well as the specific timing of taxation.

  • Relative valuationP/EV valuation

    Determine 12-month target prices using price-to-embedded-value ratios

    Prudential Plc’s target price is based on 1.1x FY27E P/EV, FWD Group Holdings on 0.8x, and AIA Group on 1.4x; FWD and AIA’s target multiples are derived using long-term embedded value return, cost of capital, and long-term growth rates.

  • Business exposure analysisVONB, EV, and offshore customer contribution analysis

    Measure the contribution of Hong Kong and offshore customer businesses to insurers’ value and sales

    The sensitivity of growth and valuation to taxation or capital flow restrictions is assessed through the contribution of Hong Kong business to new business value and embedded value, as well as the share of offshore customers in each company’s Hong Kong annualized new premiums.

Asset mapping & comparison

Structured mapping from thesis to named assets (strengths, weaknesses, peers, risks).

  • Prudential Plc (2378.HK / PRU.L)
    Relatively high direct exposure to Hong Kong and offshore customer business
    Strengths
    The report assigns a Buy rating, with 12-month target prices of HK$152 and GBp1,430; the medium-term embedded value return assumption is 14%.
    Weaknesses
    Offshore customers accounted for 62% of Hong Kong annualized new premiums in 2024, the highest among the three-company sample.
    Comparison
    Sales sensitivity to changes in Mainland Chinese visitor demand may be higher than that of AIA Group and FWD Group Holdings.
    Risks
    Tightening capital controls, slower new business sales in mainland China and Hong Kong, spillover effects on Hong Kong local business, and investment market volatility causing lower free surplus or higher capital requirements.
  • AIA Group (1299.HK)
    An important beneficiary of and risk bearer for Hong Kong insurance demand and Mainland Chinese visitor business
    Strengths
    The report assigns a Buy rating, with a 12-month target price of HK$97, based on 1.4x FY27E P/EV.
    Weaknesses
    Offshore customers accounted for 60% of Hong Kong annualized new premiums in 2024, making it relatively sensitive to changes in cross-border demand.
    Comparison
    The share of offshore customers is slightly lower than Prudential Plc but higher than FWD Group Holdings; historically, tightening capital controls have led to share price declines of about 12%–15%.
    Risks
    Slower growth of high-margin protection products in mainland China, delays in new province approvals, significant tightening of capital controls affecting Hong Kong sales and renewals, and weak economic growth in Asia.
  • FWD Group Holdings (1828.HK)
    Direct exposure to Hong Kong offshore insurance sales and regulatory changes
    Strengths
    The report assigns a Buy rating, with a 12-month target price of HK$42; it has a relatively lower share of offshore customer sales among the three companies.
    Weaknesses
    It has a shorter operating and capital markets track record, and 49% of Hong Kong annualized new premiums in 2024 still came from offshore customers.
    Comparison
    The share of offshore customers is lower than Prudential Plc and AIA Group, but its target valuation multiple of 0.8x FY27E P/EV is also relatively lower.
    Risks
    Adverse experience deviations, debt financing costs, changes in capital frameworks, funding flows and liquidity constraints in stressed markets, impairment of intangible assets, volatility in Southeast Asian growth, competition, and execution risks in product mix transformation.

Key data

  • Media-reported tax rate20%According to the interviewed cases, consistent with the tax rates on interest and dividend income; not a formal unified policy.
  • Reported taxable itemsInterest credited to participating policies; deposit interest generated from prepaid premiumsReported cases involved residents of Beijing and Hangzhou.
  • Illustrated return cap for Hong Kong participating products6% for Hong Kong dollar policies; 6.5% for non-Hong Kong dollar policiesAs of July 2025.
  • Illustrated return cap for Mainland Chinese participating products3.5%As of July 2026.
  • Relative return gap of Hong Kong products2.5–3.0 percentage points before taxation; 1.3–1.7 percentage points under the stress scenarioAssumes a 20% tax rate applies to all policy benefits, with other conditions unchanged.
  • Hong Kong business contribution to new business valueAbout 40%–50%Applicable to the companies covered in the report.
  • Hong Kong business contribution to embedded valueAbout 36%–40%Shows the importance of Hong Kong business to group value.
  • Share of offshore customers in Hong Kong annualized new premiums in 2024Prudential Plc 62%; AIA Group 60%; FWD Group Holdings 49%Offshore customers include Mainland Chinese visitors and other non-Hong Kong residents.
  • Prudential Plc target priceHK$152 (2378.HK) / GBp1,430 (PRU.L)12-month target price, based on 1.1x FY27E P/EV.
  • FWD Group Holdings target priceHK$4212-month target price, based on 0.8x FY27E P/EV.
  • AIA Group target priceHK$9712-month target price, based on 1.4x FY27E P/EV.

Impact & implications

If taxation is formally implemented, it would increase the after-tax cost for Mainland Chinese residents holding Hong Kong insurance, narrow the return advantage of Hong Kong products relative to mainland products, and may reduce willingness to purchase new policies and renew existing ones. Because Mainland Chinese visitors and other offshore customers account for a relatively high share of Hong Kong business, Prudential Plc, AIA Group, and FWD Group Holdings all face risks of downward revisions to sales, growth expectations, and valuations. However, under the report’s stress scenario, Hong Kong products still retain a relative return advantage, and the ultimate impact depends heavily on the tax base, timing of collection, consistency of regional implementation, and consumer behavior.

Risks

  • Hong Kong insurance taxation expands from individual cases into a unified policy, with the tax base covering all policy benefits.
  • Local tax authorities increase the granularity of cross-border financial information usage and apply it retrospectively to prior years.
  • Mainland China further tightens capital flows or cross-border insurance purchase regulation.
  • Demand for new policies and renewals from Mainland Chinese visitors declines significantly and spills over to Hong Kong local customers.
  • The tax base, timing of taxation, and regional implementation differences remain unclear for an extended period.
  • Investment market volatility, rising capital requirements, and slowing Asian economic growth.

What to watch

  • Whether the Ministry of Finance, the State Taxation Administration, or other regulators issue a formal announcement targeting Hong Kong insurance.
  • Whether different provinces develop a unified approach to the tax base, tax rate, timing of taxation, and retrospective scope.
  • Hong Kong sales and Mainland Chinese visitor business growth disclosed in insurers’ 1H 2026 results.
  • Quantitative validation in 2H 2026 results of the impact of regulatory news on customer demand and renewal behavior.
  • Changes in Hong Kong new business, product mix, and offshore customer share for Prudential Plc, AIA Group, and FWD Group Holdings.
  • Whether the after-tax return advantage of Hong Kong insurance products relative to mainland products remains sufficient to support cross-border demand.
Zhejiang ICP No. 2022035445-5
Disclaimer: Market data, charts, indicators, research views, and other information provided on this website are intended solely for information display, research communication, and educational reference. They should not be regarded as personalized investment advice, securities recommendations, trading instructions, solicitations, or guarantees of return. While we strive to improve the reliability of our data and content, such information may still be subject to delays, errors, incompleteness, or untimely updates due to source differences, methodological limitations, system processing, or market volatility. Users should exercise independent judgment based on their own circumstances and bear all risks and responsibilities arising from the use of this website.

Settings

Sign in to view recent logins