Quick Summary
Covering the latest research from top Wall Street investment banks

DRAM/NAND/HBM upcycle extended, storage chip valuation multiples likely to expand further

Institution
Goldman Sachs
Date
20260531
Authors
Giuni Lee, James Schneider, Shuhei Nakamura, Taeyong Lee, Daiki Takayama, Kaho Otake
Company
Kioxia Holdings, SK Hynix, Samsung Electronics
Ticker
285A, 000660, 005930
Industry
Semiconductors, DRAM, NAND, Semiconductors
Rating
Buy
BullishHigh confidenceUpgradeMedium-termupgrading Samsung and SK Hynix targets, reaffirming buy ratings, and upgrading Kioxia to buy
AuthorsGiuni Lee, James Schneider, Shuhei Nakamura, Taeyong Lee, Daiki Takayama, Kaho Otake
Target price48 million Korean won, 350 million Korean won, 9.3 million Japanese yen
CoverageJapan、South Korea、Asia-Pacific
Research firm divisions/subsidiariesGoldman Sachs (Asia) L.L.C.(Division/Team)、Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC(Division/Team)、Goldman Sachs Japan Co., Ltd.(Division/Team)

AI summary card

DRAM/NAND/HBM upcycle extended, storage chip valuation multiples likely to expand further

Goldman Sachs expects the supply-demand gap for DRAM/NAND/HBM to persist until 2028, driving profitability and valuation increases for memory manufacturers. Upgrading Samsung's target price to 48 million Korean won (+60%), SK Hynix to 350 million Korean won (+53%), and Kioxia to buy

Buy | Samsung target price 48 million Korean won (+60%), SK Hynix target price 350 million Korean won (+53%)
storage chipsDRAMNANDHBMvaluation expansionupcycle extension
  • 2027E DRAM/NAND/HBM supply-demand gap expands, DRAM +5.9%, NAND +4.6%, HBM +6.0% (2026E was 5.0%/4.4%/5.4%)
  • Samsung's DRAM/NAND ASP expected to increase by 326%/-283% in 2026E, HBM ASP by 50% in 2027E
  • SK Hynix valuation method changed from P/B to P/E, target price set at 350 million Korean won (9X P/E)
  • Long-term agreements (LTAs) enhance demand visibility, reducing cyclical fluctuations

Report interpretation

Overview

Goldman Sachs believes the current semiconductor industry upcycle is different from historical cycles, driven by significant growth in server memory demand on one hand, and slower capacity growth on the other, resulting in an extended cycle until 2028, with potential for valuation multiples to rise from current low levels to higher ones.

Core views

Demand side: Server memory share rises from 16% in 2017 to 61% in 2028, AI servers driving memory demand growth, CAGR of DRAM/NAND expected at 28%/23% from 2026-2028. Supply side: HBM occupying large wafer capacity, CAGR of DRAM capacity expected at 7-8% (lower than 12% for 2017-2018 by 4-5 percentage points), HBM capacity share continuously rising. Contract dynamics: LTAs provide more binding contract terms including prepayments and penalty clauses, reducing price volatility, enhancing demand visibility, and promoting sustainable profitability for manufacturers.

Analysis framework

The institution uses a supply-demand framework to compare differences between historical and current cycles: 1) Demand-side analysis of AI server penetration and demand growth rates; 2) Supply-side analysis of slowing capacity growth and HBM squeezing traditional memory capacity; 3) Contract dynamics analysis of increased LTA binding. Through three dimensions, it validates the sustainability of the current cycle being longer, indicating that improved memory manufacturer profitability will drive valuation expansion.

Methodology notes

  • Industry/sector Analysis FrameworkSupply-demand framework

    Storage chip industry supply-demand framework

    The supply-demand framework compares supply-demand gaps (S/D) and price trends to determine cycle lengths, showing that the current DRAM/NAND/HBM supply-demand gap persists until 2028, indicating a longer cycle than 2017-2018.

Asset mapping & comparison

Structured mapping from thesis to named assets (strengths, weaknesses, peers, risks).

  • Samsung Electronics (005930.KS)
    Increased DRAM/NAND/HBM demand drives profitability, significant progress in HBM business
    Strengths
    High DRAM/NAND demand share, accelerated HBM business growth
    Weaknesses
    -
    Comparison
    -
    Risks
    Declining smartphone profits, loss of OLED market share
  • SK Hynix (000660.KS)
    Leading HBM market share, valuation method switched to P/E
    Strengths
    Advanced HBM technology, valuation method adjusted to P/E
    Weaknesses
    -
    Comparison
    -
    Risks
    Worsening memory supply-demand, reduced AI capital expenditure
  • Kioxia Holdings (285A.T)
    Extended NAND cycle, increased demand drives valuation
    Strengths
    Continuous上涨 in NAND prices, growing HBM demand
    Weaknesses
    -
    Comparison
    -
    Risks
    -

Key data

  • DRAM 2027E supply-demand gap5.9%2026E was 5.0%
  • NAND 2027E supply-demand gap4.6%2026E was 4.4%
  • HBM 2027E supply-demand gap6.0%2026E was 5.4%
  • Samsung DRAM 2026E ASP326%year-over-year increase
  • Samsung NAND 2026E ASP283%year-over-year increase

Impact & implications

Memory manufacturers' profitability continues to improve, with DRAM/NAND gross margins expected to remain at 80%/mid-high levels. Current valuation multiples (Samsung 7X, SK Hynix 3.4X) are significantly lower than historical average multiples (9X-10X), suggesting potential for valuations to reach 10X-20X levels if the cycle persists until 2028, offering substantial valuation expansion space.

Risks

  • Worsening memory supply-demand leading to price declines
  • Declining smartphone demand impacting traditional memory
  • Samsung's HBM business impact on SK Hynix's HBM revenue
  • Reduced AI-related capital expenditure affecting HBM demand
Zhejiang ICP No. 2022035445-5
Disclaimer: Market data, charts, indicators, research views, and other information provided on this website are intended solely for information display, research communication, and educational reference. They should not be regarded as personalized investment advice, securities recommendations, trading instructions, solicitations, or guarantees of return. While we strive to improve the reliability of our data and content, such information may still be subject to delays, errors, incompleteness, or untimely updates due to source differences, methodological limitations, system processing, or market volatility. Users should exercise independent judgment based on their own circumstances and bear all risks and responsibilities arising from the use of this website.

Settings

Sign in to view recent logins