MedTech valuations are discounted but the fundamental backdrop remains cautious, requiring selective stock picks in 2Q26
AI summary card
MedTech valuations are discounted but the fundamental backdrop remains cautious, requiring selective stock picks in 2Q26
Goldman Sachs maintains a neutral-to-cautious view on the MedTech macro backdrop ahead of the 2Q26 earnings season, seeing industry growth still not normalized, sector estimates broadly lowered, but highlighting stock-specific drivers above consensus for names such as ABT, ISRG, and MDLN.
- The sector has significantly underperformed year-to-date, and most large-cap MedTech coverage stocks trade at valuation multiples below the 20-year historical average.
- 2Q26 U.S. hospital volumes and utilization improved from 1Q but have not normalized, and the report remains cautious on the direction of macro demand.
- Goldman Sachs sees most organic growth forecasts in line with or slightly below consensus, with ABT, ISRG, and MDLN being the main exceptions above market expectations.
- The report states that slightly better-than-expected 2Q results could support a near-term rebound, but sustained recovery still requires more aggressive capital allocation, calibration of 2026 and longer-term expectations, and evidence of pipeline or growth acceleration.
- Goldman Sachs lowered sector estimates based on updates to assumptions including end market, share, FX, lagged inflation pass-through, and margin pressure.
Report interpretation
Overview
This report is a Goldman Sachs 2Q26 earnings preview and chart pack for MedTech and HCIT coverage companies. It notes that the sector faces both mixed fundamentals and valuation discounting: on the one hand, medical utilization and hospital volume conditions in the U.S. have not normalized, and product-cycle support that has recently kept growth above trend is maturing, while some companies once viewed as directional leaders are experiencing company-specific headwinds; on the other hand, most large-cap MedTech coverage stocks now trade at multiples below long-term historical averages.
Core views
The key view is to stay selective on the sector rather than broadly constructive. Goldman Sachs believes 2Q26 could improve marginally versus 1Q, but without offsetting catch-up demand. Both company and market consensus generally do not assume a clearly faster second-half end-market acceleration. Revenue-side risk is relatively limited because most companies’ guidance does not assume a large improvement; on the profit side, full-year improvement is still expected from scale and mix, but current estimates have heavier 4Q weighting, so any 2Q EPS or margin upside may be used to offset second-half ramp pressure.
Analysis framework
The report evaluates 2Q26 earnings risk-reward through comparisons of Goldman Sachs forecasts against Visible Alpha consensus, company implied guidance, weighted-average organic growth and margins, raw-material costs, year-to-date stock performance, historical valuation multiples, and company model adjustments. At the stock level, it updates assumptions on revenue, margins, EPS, and/or EBITDA using product cycles, market share, FX, costs, competition, and quarterly cadence.
Methodology notes
Goldman Sachs forecasts versus consensus
The report compares Goldman Sachs forecasts for revenue, organic growth, EPS, and EBITDA with Visible Alpha consensus to assess upside or downside versus market expectations for 2Q26 earnings.
Historical multiple discount
The report compares current P/E or EV/Sales multiples of coverage companies with peak, trough, and average values since 2005 to judge whether current valuations already reflect fundamental pressure.
Growth, returns, valuation multiples, and composite percentile
The Goldman Sachs Factor Profile combines forward sales growth, EBITDA growth, EPS growth, ROE, ROCE, CROCI, and valuation multiples into percentile rankings to support cross-stock comparison.
Potential take-over probability score
Goldman Sachs uses a 1-to-3 M&A Rank to assess a company’s likelihood of being an acquisition target, where 1 means high probability, 2 means medium probability, and 3 means low probability; for some companies, target prices incorporate M&A components.
Asset mapping & comparison
Structured mapping from thesis to named assets (strengths, weaknesses, peers, risks).
- Large-cap MedTech coverage basketCore coverage universe
- Strengths
- Most companies currently trade below long-term averages, and full-year revenue guidance does not assume significant end-market acceleration; the near-term expectation hurdle is relatively manageable.
- Weaknesses
- Industry growth is slowing, product cycles are maturing, utilization has not normalized, and some companies face company-specific headwinds.
- Comparison
- Compared with the S&P 500, whose valuation is above historical averages, MedTech average multiples are below its own long-term average.
- Risks
- If 2H26 margins and EPS ramp are not delivered, estimates may continue to be reduced.
- ABTOne of the exceptions where Goldman Sachs organic growth forecasts exceed consensus
- Strengths
- Delayed recovery in Libre overseas tenders, Instinct shipments to MiniMed, easing comparable base in diagnostics, and increased EP share.
- Weaknesses
- Still exposed to slowing diabetes technology end markets, competition, margin-target execution, and China VBP-related risks.
- Comparison
- The report says GSe organic growth is 60 bps above consensus.
- Risks
- NEC litigation, intensified medical device competition, FX and tariff volatility.
- ISRGOne of the exceptions where Goldman Sachs organic growth forecasts exceed consensus
- Strengths
- Higher U.S. revenue per case and support from Sp, Ion, and haptic portfolio.
- Weaknesses
- Valuation remains elevated and results are sensitive to the pace of robotic surgery penetration.
- Comparison
- The report says GSe organic growth is 70 bps above consensus.
- Risks
- Robotic surgery penetration slower than expected, delays in DV5 rollout, competitive pressure, and tariff risk.
- MDLNOne of the exceptions where Goldman Sachs organic growth forecasts exceed consensus
- Strengths
- Quarterly billable days and comparable base provide cyclical support.
- Weaknesses
- High spending intensity, ramp spending at new customer onboarding, quality control, and distribution network expansion may restrain margin expansion.
- Comparison
- The report says GSe organic growth is 130 bps above consensus.
- Risks
- Slower healthcare utilization, trade restrictions, supply chain disruptions, and erosion of cost-discount advantages.
- EW, OMDA, PODDSelect stocks highlighted as having potential quarterly upside
- Strengths
- Goldman Sachs sees these names having not only possible quarterly upside but also potential benefit from improved forward-looking narratives.
- Weaknesses
- The input snippet does not fully detail each company’s specific upside drivers.
- Comparison
- Compared with the broader cautious sector view, these are more selective opportunities.
- Risks
- Product adoption, competitive intensity, margin pace, and market expectation shifts.
- ABT, MMEDStocks where narratives may improve in 2H26 through 2027
- Strengths
- The report sees positive inflection possibilities in forward-looking narratives.
- Weaknesses
- Still depend on product cycles, market share, and recovery in end-market demand.
- Comparison
- Compared with assets focused only on near-term quarterly upside, these are more medium-term narrative-improvement stories.
- Risks
- If macro utilization does not improve or competition intensifies, narrative improvement may be delayed.
Key data
- Report date2026-07-14The filename and disclosure date indicate July 14, 2026.
- Coverage themeMedTech & HCIT 2Q26 earnings outlookThe report title is explicitly a 2Q26 Chart Pack Preview.
- Sector viewNeutral to cautiousThe report states a neutral to cautious view on the broader macro backdrop going into earnings season.
- 2Q26 U.S. medical volume backdropImproved from prior quarter but not normalizedThe 2Q26 Hospital Due Diligence Day and Utilization Diagnostic show that U.S. volume conditions remain challenging.
- Organic growth vs consensusMost in line or slightly below; ABT +60 bps, ISRG +70 bps, MDLN +130 bpsThese above-consensus differences are mainly driven by company-specific factors.
- Large-cap MedTech historical valuationCurrent average P/E 18.9x, about 6.3x below the 25.2x average since 2005Exhibit 10 shows Medical Technology Average multiples trading at a discount to historical averages.
- S&P 500 valuation contextCurrent P/E 21.6x, about 4.8x above the historical average of 16.8xThis contrasts with the MedTech discount.
- Goldman Sachs model adjustments directionSector estimates reduced overallThe report says industry estimates were revised up and down due to updates in end-market, market share, FX, and P&L dynamics.
- Short-term rebound conditionSlightly better-than-expected results may support a short-term stock reboundSustained recovery, however, requires stronger capital allocation, expectation recalibration, and better growth-pipeline visibility.
Impact & implications
For investment implications, the valuation discount provides some margin of safety, but fundamentals are not yet strong enough to support a broad sector re-rating. The report emphasizes stock selection: in the short term, focus on companies that could beat expectations in 2Q; in the medium term, focus on names where the narrative may improve from 2H26 onward, with more aggressive capital deployment or pipeline-driven re-acceleration. If utilization does not improve, inflation pass-through continues to pressure margins, or if 2H26 ramp is too heavy, the sector could still face further estimate cuts and valuation headwinds.
Risks
- The U.S. healthcare utilization and hospital volume environment has not normalized and may drag revenue growth.
- Industry product cycles are maturing, weakening the growth support that previously was above trend.
- Inflation and raw material costs may flow into the P&L with a lag, pressuring gross margins and EPS.
- Current estimates are heavily reliant on 4Q and second-half ramping; if execution falls short, revisions downward may occur.
- Tariffs, FX volatility, China VBP, local competition, supply chain, and healthcare policy changes may impact multiple companies.
- A valuation discount does not automatically mean immediate re-rating; if capital deployment and pipeline visibility remain insufficient, sector rebounds may be only short-lived trading opportunities.
What to watch
- Whether 2Q26 organic growth improves marginally versus 1Q and whether it exceeds consensus.
- Whether companies maintain, cut, or recalibrate 2026 and longer-term revenue and margin guidance.
- Key end-market trends such as hospital volume, surgery volume, CGM, EP, TAVR, TMTT, and diabetes devices.
- Whether 2Q EPS or margin upside is used by management to offset 2H26 ramp pressure.
- How raw materials, semiconductors, freight, FX, and tariffs actually flow through to gross margins.
- Whether capital allocation becomes more active, including shareholder returns, M&A, growth-oriented cash use, and balance sheet deployment.
- Performance and narrative changes of selected names such as ABT, ISRG, MDLN, EW, OMDA, PODD, and MMED.