Quick Summary
Covering the latest research from top Wall Street investment banks

May MLCC exports rose 18.6% y-y, with a sharp increase in Hong Kong demand indicating accelerating trader restocking

Institution
Nomura
Date
2026-06-30
Authors
Manabu Akizuki
Company
-
Ticker
-
Industry
Electronic Components
Rating
-
NeutralLow confidenceJapan's MLCC exports continued to grow year-on-year in May, with improving demand from AI servers, EVs, and network equipment, but the report believes overall MLCC supply and demand may not tighten solely because of AI demand, and that short-term disruption is coming more from restocking by Greater China traders.
AuthorsManabu Akizuki
CoverageChina、Europe
Business segmentsMLCC、inductors、fixed resistors、aluminum electrolytic capacitors、tantalum electrolytic capacitors、AI server power supply units、EV-related demand、network equipment
Research firm divisions/subsidiariesNomura(Other)、Nomura Securities Co., Ltd.(Other)

AI summary card

May MLCC exports rose 18.6% y-y, with a sharp increase in Hong Kong demand indicating accelerating trader restocking

Nomura believes Japan's MLCC exports are maintaining growth, with AI servers, EVs, and network equipment driving demand for higher value-added products, but overall supply-demand tightness is more affected by Greater China trader restocking and supply constraints in high-voltage MLCCs.

This report is an industry data update and does not provide stock ratings, target prices, or rating changes; the overall industry tone is positive, but it remains cautious on a broad tightening of MLCC supply and demand.
MLCCelectronic componentsJapan exportsAI serversGreater China trader restockinghigh-voltage MLCCEV demandpassive components
  • In May, yen-denominated MLCC exports rose 18.6% y-y, of which exports to Hong Kong rose 55.0% y-y, significantly outpacing other major destinations.
  • Taiwan and Thailand's shares in Japan's MLCC exports reached record highs of 16.9% and 3.3%, respectively, and Nomura expects their combined share could rise to around 25% by next spring.
  • Average MLCC value-added rose from $1.01/g last month to $1.05/g, driven by recovering EV demand in Europe, increased demand for network equipment, and stronger demand for AI server power supply PSUs.
  • Taiwan's capacitor imports reached a record high of $296mn in May, but MLCC import growth lagged that of tantalum capacitors and aluminum electrolytic capacitors; the report believes AI server demand alone is still insufficient to drive a broad tightening in overall MLCC supply and demand.

Report interpretation

Overview

This report tracks Japan's electronic components trade data for May 2026, with a core focus on the export performance of MLCCs, aluminum electrolytic capacitors, inductors, and fixed resistors. The data show that MLCC exports continued to grow year-on-year, with destinations such as Hong Kong, Taiwan, and Thailand making clearly larger contributions, reflecting both restocking by Greater China traders and demand from AI server-related applications.

Core views

Nomura's core view is that improving MLCC demand is not driven solely by AI servers, but jointly by trader restocking, AI server power supplies, network equipment, and EV-related demand. The sharp increase in exports to Hong Kong indicates that short-term orders may include one-off restocking factors; record-high shares for Taiwan and Thailand indicate rising weight in the AI server and power supply chain; however, judging from Taiwan's capacitor import mix, MLCC growth is weaker than that of tantalum capacitors and aluminum electrolytic capacitors, so it is still difficult to prove that overall MLCC supply and demand have broadly tightened because of AI demand.

Analysis framework

The report mainly uses Japan Ministry of Finance trade statistics, JEITA global shipment data, and Taiwan trade statistics to compare year-on-year and month-on-month changes in export value, destination mix, U.S. dollar-based trends, average value-added, and capacitor import structure, while explaining demand changes in conjunction with application scenarios such as AI servers, power supply PSUs, EVs, and network equipment.

Methodology notes

  • industry data trackingtrade statistics year-on-year and regional breakdown

    use export value and destination changes to judge demand sources

    By looking at Japan's MLCC export growth rates and shares to regions such as Hong Kong, Taiwan, Thailand, China, and Singapore, the report distinguishes trader restocking, AI server-related demand, and recovery in end applications.

  • product mix analysisaverage value-added indicator

    use $/g to measure MLCC product mix and profit correlation

    The report treats average MLCC value-added as a product mix indicator and notes that it is correlated with manufacturers' gross margins; this indicator rose slightly in May, showing increased contribution from higher value-added applications.

  • supply-demand assessmentcross-validation using Taiwan capacitor import structure

    use Taiwan capacitor import value to assess the strength of AI server component demand

    Taiwan is an important node in the AI server supply chain. The report compares import changes in MLCCs, aluminum electrolytic capacitors, and tantalum capacitors to judge whether AI server demand for different capacitor categories is strong enough to cause supply-demand tightness.

Asset mapping & comparison

Structured mapping from thesis to named assets (strengths, weaknesses, peers, risks).

  • MLCC manufacturers
    directly benefit from MLCC export growth and product mix improvement
    Strengths
    Year-on-year export growth, rising average value-added, and improving demand from AI server and EV-related applications.
    Weaknesses
    Overall MLCC supply and demand have not yet tightened significantly due to AI demand alone, and some orders may come from short-term trader restocking.
    Comparison
    Compared with tantalum capacitors and aluminum electrolytic capacitors, Taiwan's MLCC imports have risen less relative to the previous peak.
    Risks
    Order pullback after restocking ends, weaker-than-expected price recovery, and fluctuations in consumer electronics demand.
  • High-voltage MLCC and AI server power supply PSU supply chain
    the report believes underlying demand may already exceed supply
    Strengths
    Expansion of high-voltage MLCC supply is relatively difficult, while demand is increasing for AI power supplies and server PSUs.
    Weaknesses
    Demand data can easily be mixed with trader inventory behavior, so the real pull from end demand needs further verification.
    Comparison
    Compared with ordinary MLCCs, high-voltage products are more likely to face structural supply constraints.
    Risks
    A slowdown in AI server build-out, changes in power architecture, and customer inventory adjustments.
  • Aluminum electrolytic capacitors
    affected by export growth and material cost pass-through
    Strengths
    May exports were +26.5% y-y on a yen basis and +15.7% y-y on a U.S. dollar basis.
    Weaknesses
    Price increases may mainly reflect material costs such as aluminum foil rather than being entirely driven by improved end demand.
    Comparison
    Taiwan imports are up 64% relative to the previous peak, stronger than MLCCs but weaker than tantalum capacitors.
    Risks
    Material price volatility, incomplete cost pass-through, and slowing downstream demand.
  • Fixed resistors
    part of the recovery in electronic component exports
    Strengths
    May exports were +28.0% y-y on a yen basis and +17.0% y-y on a U.S. dollar basis.
    Weaknesses
    The report does not provide sufficiently detailed sources of demand, so sustainability still needs to be observed.
    Comparison
    Growth on a yen basis was higher than for MLCCs and inductors.
    Risks
    Exchange-rate effects, fading end-market restocking, and unstable consumer electronics demand.
  • Inductors
    passive component export improvement, but with weaker momentum
    Strengths
    May exports were +10.4% y-y on a yen basis, extending April's growth.
    Weaknesses
    Only +0.9% y-y on a U.S. dollar basis, indicating limited underlying growth strength.
    Comparison
    Growth was lower than for MLCCs, fixed resistors, and aluminum electrolytic capacitors.
    Risks
    Exchange-rate disruption, insufficient end demand, and reversal of the inventory cycle.

Key data

  • May MLCC exports (yen basis)+18.6% y-yApril was +28.0%, March was +21.7%, and February was +8.0%.
  • May MLCC exports to Hong Kong+55.0% y-ySignificantly higher than other major destinations, supporting the view of trader restocking in Greater China.
  • May MLCC exports (U.S. dollar basis)+8.4% y-yGrowth on a yen basis was affected by exchange rates; USD/JPY was 158.3 in May.
  • May inductor exports (yen basis)+10.4% y-y+0.9% y-y on a U.S. dollar basis.
  • May fixed resistor exports (yen basis)+28.0% y-y+17.0% y-y on a U.S. dollar basis.
  • May aluminum electrolytic capacitor exports (yen basis)+26.5% y-y+15.7% y-y on a U.S. dollar basis; the report believes prices may already reflect rising material costs such as aluminum foil.
  • Taiwan MLCC export share16.9%Reached a record high, reflecting rising AI server-related demand.
  • Thailand MLCC export share3.3%Reached a record high; Thailand is mainly associated with demand from the power supply chain.
  • Outlook for combined Taiwan and Thailand sharearound 25%Nomura expects the combined share of the two countries could rise to around 25% by next spring.
  • Average MLCC value-added$1.05/g$1.01/g last month, indicating a slight improvement in product mix.
  • Taiwan May capacitor imports$296mnA record high, used to observe demand for AI server-related components.
  • Taiwan May MLCC imports$191mnUp 24% versus the previous cycle peak, with growth lagging tantalum capacitors and aluminum electrolytic capacitors.
  • Taiwan May tantalum capacitor imports$53mnUp 98% versus the previous cycle peak in August 2021.
  • Taiwan May aluminum electrolytic capacitor imports$52mnUp 64% versus the previous cycle peak.

Impact & implications

In terms of investment implications, demand signals are improving for the MLCC and passive component chain, especially in applications related to AI server power supplies, high-voltage MLCCs, EVs, and network equipment; however, because trader restocking may amplify short-term export data, investors need to distinguish between sustainable end demand and a one-off inventory cycle. The difficulty of increasing supply of high-voltage MLCCs may be a more persistent source of tightness.

Risks

  • Orders related to Hong Kong and China may include one-off trader restocking, creating uncertainty over the sustainability of subsequent demand.
  • Although AI server demand is rising, Taiwan's capacitor import structure is still insufficient to prove on its own that overall MLCC supply and demand have broadly tightened.
  • Changes in the yen exchange rate can amplify or suppress yen-denominated export growth, so the U.S. dollar basis should also be monitored.
  • Rising material costs such as aluminum foil may affect the pricing and profit pass-through of aluminum electrolytic capacitors.
  • If demand for EVs, network equipment, and AI servers falls short of expectations, improvement in the high value-added product mix will weaken.

What to watch

  • Whether subsequent growth in Japan's MLCC exports to Hong Kong, China, Taiwan, and Thailand continues.
  • Whether the combined share of Taiwan and Thailand in MLCC exports can rise to around 25% as expected.
  • Whether average MLCC value-added can continue to stay above $1.05/g and reflect product mix improvement.
  • The relative changes in Taiwan's imports of MLCCs, tantalum capacitors, and aluminum electrolytic capacitors, to assess the extent of AI server demand spillover.
  • Whether supply bottlenecks in high-voltage MLCCs used in AI server PSUs and AI power supplies become more explicit.
Zhejiang ICP No. 2022035445-5
Disclaimer: Market data, charts, indicators, research views, and other information provided on this website are intended solely for information display, research communication, and educational reference. They should not be regarded as personalized investment advice, securities recommendations, trading instructions, solicitations, or guarantees of return. While we strive to improve the reliability of our data and content, such information may still be subject to delays, errors, incompleteness, or untimely updates due to source differences, methodological limitations, system processing, or market volatility. Users should exercise independent judgment based on their own circumstances and bear all risks and responsibilities arising from the use of this website.

Settings

Sign in to view recent logins