Quick Summary
Covering the latest research from top Wall Street investment banks

Chinese AI models are approaching the intelligence inflection point for global proliferation

Institution
Goldman Sachs
Date
2026-07-14
Authors
Ronald Keung, CFA, Damian Xie, Eric Sheridan, Iris Xiao, Allen Chang, Steve Qiu
Company
-
Ticker
-
Industry
AI
Rating
MiniMax Group Buy; Knowledge Atlas Neutral
NeutralLow confidenceThe report believes that China's open-source/open-weight AI models are approaching a critical inflection point in intelligence level, cost efficiency, and global proliferation, but are affected by regulation, compute power, and overseas market access.
AuthorsRonald Keung, CFA, Damian Xie, Eric Sheridan, Iris Xiao, Allen Chang, Steve Qiu
CoverageOther
Business segmentsfoundation models、multi-modal generation models、API platform services、agentic applications、coding models、cloud computing、domestic ASICs
Research firm divisions/subsidiariesGoldman Sachs (Asia) L.L.C.(Other)、Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC(Other)

AI summary card

Chinese AI models are approaching the intelligence inflection point for global proliferation

Goldman Sachs believes that Chinese open-source/open-weight models are entering an accelerated adoption phase driven by cost efficiency, coding/agent capabilities, and overseas SME demand, while long-term winners will depend on ARR scale, gross margin advantage, and financial strength.

The thematic view is positive overall; at the single-stock level, the report reiterates MiniMax Buy and mentions Knowledge Atlas initiation Neutral.
Artificial intelligenceChinese large modelsOpen-source modelsOpen weightAgentsCoding modelsMultimodalCompute constraints
  • Chinese models have reached a critical 'good enough' stage in coding and agent tasks, and enterprise adoption as well as global SME demand are rising.
  • The report expects Chinese AI model token volume to grow 25X by 2030E, with overseas tokens accounting for 5% of global tokens by 2030E.
  • The competitive framework focuses on pricing power, cost advantage, and financial strength; Zhipu and DeepSeek are strongly positioned in text foundation models, while ByteDance leads in multimodal capabilities.
  • Downside risks include overseas market access, anti-distillation and regulatory restrictions, access to high-end training compute, and competition from small models or new AI architectures.

Report interpretation

Overview

This report is Goldman Sachs' in-depth thematic research on China's AI model industry. Its core judgment is that Chinese open-source and open-weight models are approaching a critical point where their intelligence performance nears that of leading global proprietary models, while expanding adoption among domestic enterprises and global SMEs through lower inference costs, smaller parameter sizes, and architectural innovations such as MoE. The report focuses on how Chinese models achieve competitive performance at low cost, why they adopt the open-source/open-weight route, the addressable market and monetization path, and which companies are more likely to become long-term winners.

Core views

The report believes that the Chinese AI model market is forming a two-tier structure: high-performance models retain pricing power through intelligence level and speed to market, while low-cost agent models unlock price-sensitive demand at US$0.06-0.2/1M blended tokens. Real usage growth of Chinese models in coding and agent scenarios will form a data flywheel and reduce reliance on distillation. Long-term winners should have the largest ARR scale, gross margin advantage, and financial strength, with Zhipu and DeepSeek strongest in text foundation models and ByteDance leading in multimodal.

Analysis framework

The report combines an industry framework with company comparisons, analyzing the long-term competitive positioning of Chinese AI model companies around token scale, pricing, inference cost, model architecture, compute availability, cash reserves, valuation multiples, and market share, while separately incorporating domestic and overseas demand, API and subscription revenue pools, and coding/agent/multimodal applications into the discussion.

Methodology notes

  • Competitive positioningCompetitive Positioning framework

    Pricing power, cost advantage, financial strength

    The report evaluates AI model companies across three dimensions: pricing power is measured by model launch timing, Arena real-usage scores, and price level; cost advantage is measured by token scale, throughput, cache hit rate, parameter size, activation ratio, and estimated inference gross margin; financial strength is measured by cash, net cash as a share of assets, and valuation multiples.

  • Market sizeToken and revenue share forecast

    Token growth and revenue pool forecast

    The report estimates domestic and overseas revenue opportunities for Chinese AI model companies using token consumption, API pricing, subscription revenue, and market share, and extrapolates for uncovered companies such as DeepSeek, ByteDance, and Zhipu using industry and covered-company data.

  • Business modelOpen-source/open-weight monetization

    Open-source proliferation and commercial licensing

    The report believes open source helps training, deployment flexibility, and community adoption, but that future high-performance models may shift more toward open weight plus Community License, monetizing through commercial-use revenue sharing or take rate.

Asset mapping & comparison

Structured mapping from thesis to named assets (strengths, weaknesses, peers, risks).

  • Zhipu / Knowledge Atlas
    One of the leaders in text foundation models
    Strengths
    Strong coding and agent model capabilities; models such as GLM5.2 support pricing improvement, and the report lists it as one of the strongest-positioned companies in foundation models.
    Weaknesses
    As an independent AI company, it still needs to continue proving commercialization scale, financial strength, and access to high-end compute.
    Comparison
    Listed together with DeepSeek as the strongest in text foundation models; compared with mega-caps, its capital and ecosystem resources may be weaker.
    Risks
    Overseas model access restrictions, catch-up by competitors with larger-parameter models, pricing pressure, and regulatory changes.
  • DeepSeek
    Representative of low-cost, high-efficiency foundation models
    Strengths
    Outstanding cost efficiency; DSpark improves the online service speed of DeepSeek-V4 Flash / Pro, supporting scalable token usage.
    Weaknesses
    Some indicators such as valuation multiples are not applicable or have limited disclosure, and commercialization and market access remain uncertain.
    Comparison
    Along with Zhipu, it is among the strongest-positioned foundation models; it is especially strong in cost efficiency.
    Risks
    Overseas access restrictions, anti-distillation policies, access to high-end training compute, and low-price competition.
  • ByteDance
    Leader in multimodal models
    Strengths
    The report believes ByteDance leads in multi-modal capabilities, and Seedance ARR run-rate and gross margin performance are healthy.
    Weaknesses
    Relevant operating metrics are extrapolated by the report from industry and covered-company data, with limited disclosure transparency.
    Comparison
    Compared with text foundation models, ByteDance stands out more in multimodal and video generation.
    Risks
    Overseas regulation, data security reviews, local compute requirements, and market access restrictions.
  • MiniMax Group (0100.HK)
    Beneficiary of multimodal and low-cost models
    Strengths
    M3 is in the report's preferred ARR maximization quadrant, with outstanding cost efficiency and a high overseas revenue mix; the report reiterates Buy.
    Weaknesses
    Its overall competitive positioning still depends on further improvements in pricing power and financial strength.
    Comparison
    Valued at 13X P/2026E year-end ARR; the report says it trades at a discount relative to Chinese and global ARR peers at a similar stage.
    Risks
    Low-end API pricing pressure, model update timing, H3 video generation performance, and funding capacity.
  • Alibaba Qwen
    Mega-cap beneficiary of full-stack AI and cloud
    Strengths
    Synergies between full-stack AI and cloud business; high-performance Qwen models have pricing power of around US$1/1M blended tokens.
    Weaknesses
    Cloud capex conversion efficiency, model competition, and price wars will affect the pace of returns.
    Comparison
    Compared with independent model companies, Alibaba has cloud and cash flow support, but it must continue to lead in model performance and ecosystem adoption.
    Risks
    Capex returns, cloud competition, regulation, and high-end compute restrictions.
  • Tencent Hunyuan
    Mega-cap AI model competitor
    Strengths
    The report says it is a strong competitor after its AI strategy adjustment, and the Weixin AI agent has potential.
    Weaknesses
    Model ranking, commercialization speed, and ecosystem closure still need to be validated.
    Comparison
    Like Alibaba, it is a mega-cap player backed by funding support, but its application entry points and social traffic differ significantly.
    Risks
    Lagging model iteration, weaker-than-expected productization, and price competition.

Key data

  • China AI model token growth25X by 2030EThe report expects tokens generated by Chinese AI model companies to increase 25-fold by 2030E versus current levels.
  • Overseas token share5% of global tokens by 2030EThe report expects tokens generated overseas by Chinese AI model companies to reach 5% of global tokens by 2030E.
  • China AI API + subscription revenue poolUS$125bn in 2030EThe report estimates China's AI API and subscription revenue pool will reach US$125bn by 2030E.
  • High-performance Chinese model pricingaround US$1 per blended 1M tokensHigh-performance models such as Zhipu GLM5.2 and Alibaba Qwen3.7 Max are priced at around 5X the low-end Chinese model level.
  • Low-end agent model pricingUS$0.06-0.2 per blended 1M tokensThe low-price range helps models reach price-sensitive global SMEs and individual company demand.
  • Chinese model parameter scale200bn to 1.6T parametersThe report says Chinese model parameter scales are about 2-10% of leading SOTA models and improve efficiency through MoE, Sparse Attention, and related methods.
  • LongCat 2.01.6 trillion-parameter open-source MoE modelMeituan LongCat 2.0 is seen as an important milestone in China's domestic AI infrastructure, reportedly trained and deployed on a 50,000-card domestic compute cluster.
  • ByteDance Seedance ARRUS$2bn+ ARR run-rate; 70% gross marginCiting LatePost and 36Kr, the report says ByteDance Seedance's latest ARR run-rate exceeds US$2bn, with gross margin around 70%.

Impact & implications

The investment implication is that the value focus of China's AI model industry may shift from pure token-volume expansion toward ROI, task cost, real agent usage, and enterprise automation outcomes. High-performance coding models, multimodal video generation, and low-cost agent models each correspond to different ARR maximization paths; companies with advantages in compute, cash, and inference efficiency are more likely to retain long-term value after the price war.

Risks

  • Access restrictions in overseas markets for leading Chinese AI models may tighten.
  • Data security, deployment, and compliance policies in Western markets toward Chinese models may restrict proliferation.
  • Restricted access to high-end training compute and overseas rented compute could affect model iteration.
  • Price wars in low-end agent model APIs may compress gross margins and prolong the profitability inflection point.
  • Anti-distillation, entity list, and market access policies may alter the industry's growth trajectory.
  • SLMs and new AI architectures may weaken the long-term value of the current large-model route.
  • Multimodal demand is strong but constrained by compute capacity, and supply-demand mismatches may affect service stability.

What to watch

  • Whether Chinese model companies launch new 2-5 trillion parameter-class models in 2H 2026.
  • How subsequent updates to Zhipu GLM, DeepSeek V4, and MiniMax M3/H3 improve coding, agent, and video generation capabilities.
  • Whether API pricing shifts from token-maxxing toward ROI, task cost, and Daily Active Agents as key measures.
  • Whether Chinese domestic ASICs and local compute clusters can support more frontier training.
  • Whether overseas cloud vendors host Chinese open-weight models, and whether regulation tightens.
  • Whether China's AI API + subscription revenue pool and overseas token share materialize in line with the report's forecasts.
  • ARR and gross margin trends for video generation models such as ByteDance Seedance, Kuaishou Kling, and MiniMax Hailuo/H3.
Zhejiang ICP No. 2022035445-5
Disclaimer: Market data, charts, indicators, research views, and other information provided on this website are intended solely for information display, research communication, and educational reference. They should not be regarded as personalized investment advice, securities recommendations, trading instructions, solicitations, or guarantees of return. While we strive to improve the reliability of our data and content, such information may still be subject to delays, errors, incompleteness, or untimely updates due to source differences, methodological limitations, system processing, or market volatility. Users should exercise independent judgment based on their own circumstances and bear all risks and responsibilities arising from the use of this website.

Settings

Sign in to view recent logins