Quick Summary
Covering the latest research from top Wall Street investment banks

Investor leverage may have already peaked, with technology stocks facing potential headwinds

Institution
J.P. Morgan
Date
2026-06-24
Authors
Nikolaos Panigirtzoglou, Mika Inkinen, Mayur Yeole, Krutik P Mehta
Company
-
Ticker
-
Industry
Global Markets Strategy / Cross Asset / Fixed Income
Rating
-
BearishLow confidenceThe report believes there are already signs of a pullback in retail options and margin-account leverage, as well as risk parity fund leverage, which could create headwinds for technology stocks; however, lower corporate and household leverage implies limited vulnerability to macro shocks.
AuthorsNikolaos Panigirtzoglou, Mika Inkinen, Mayur Yeole, Krutik P Mehta
CoverageUnited States、Emerging Markets、Europe
Asset classesDerivatives、Crypto
Business segmentsFund Flows and Liquidity、Investor Leverage、Global Bond Supply and Demand、Cross-Asset Position Monitoring
Research firm divisions/subsidiariesJ.P. Morgan(Other)

AI summary card

Investor leverage may have already peaked, with technology stocks facing potential headwinds

J.P. Morgan believes that retail options and margin leverage, as well as risk parity fund leverage, have retreated from high levels, and technology stocks may come under pressure; global bond supply and demand is expected to deteriorate slightly in 2026, but this has largely been priced in by the market.

This report is a cross-asset fund flow and liquidity tracker and does not provide stock ratings, target prices, or expected upside.
Investor LeverageTechnology Stock HeadwindsRisk Parity FundsGlobal Bond Supply and DemandCross-Asset Fund Flows
  • There are signs that retail leverage in options and margin accounts has retreated from extreme levels, with net purchases of single-stock call options by small customers falling after nearing 14 million contracts on June 5.
  • Flows into leveraged equity ETFs have not shown a clear retreat, with global assets of about $247bn, and they continue to amplify moves in technology stocks, especially in some Asian markets.
  • Implied leverage in risk parity funds recently declined after reaching a more than decade high in mid-May; signals that hedge fund and bank leverage have peaked remain more preliminary.
  • Corporate and household leverage has been on a declining trend since the pandemic, and the report believes their vulnerability to macro shocks is limited.
  • Global bond supply-demand balance is expected to worsen by about $300bn in 2026 versus 2025, with an estimated impact on Global Agg yields of around 15-20bp, smaller than the year-to-date rise in yields.

Report interpretation

Overview

This report focuses on two main questions: whether investor leverage has already peaked and whether global bond supply and demand will continue to deteriorate in 2026. The report points out that retail options trading and margin-account leverage have retreated from the extreme levels seen earlier this year, while risk parity fund leverage has also declined after hitting a historical high in mid-May. These changes may weaken the flow momentum that had previously supported technology stock gains. Meanwhile, hedge fund and bank leverage show only milder and more preliminary signs of peaking, while declining corporate and household leverage means macro systemic vulnerability is relatively limited.

Core views

The core view is that the marginal change in investor leverage matters more than the absolute level. Cooling retail leverage could create persistent headwinds for technology stocks; deleveraging by risk parity funds may weaken multi-asset risk appetite; but at the macro level, corporate and household leverage does not show meaningful stress. On bonds, global bond demand is expected to change little in 2026, while supply rises by about $300bn, causing a slight deterioration in the supply-demand balance, though the bond market has already reflected a considerable share of this pressure through the rise in Global Agg yields this year.

Analysis framework

The report uses a cross-asset framework of fund flows, leverage proxy indicators, and supply-demand decomposition to examine the asset allocation and leverage behavior of retail investors, leveraged ETFs, hedge funds, risk parity funds, banks, corporates, households, central banks, commercial banks, pension and insurance institutions, official reserve managers, and other entities, and maps changes in these entities to technology stocks, global bond yields, and macro risk vulnerability.

Methodology notes

  • Leverage MonitoringRetail Options Trading Proxy Indicator

    Uses OCC data on opening purchases minus opening sales of single-stock call options by customers trading fewer than 10 contracts per trade to measure retail options leverage impulse.

    This indicator reached nearly 14 million contracts on June 5, close to the highs of October 2025 and November 2021; historically, similar peaks were followed by several months of correction in technology stocks.

  • Leverage MonitoringNYSE Net Debit Balance in Margin Accounts

    Uses margin debit balances minus credit balances in cash and margin accounts, normalized by S&P 500 market capitalization, as a proxy for U.S. individual investor margin leverage.

    The report believes this indicator is at historically extreme levels and has recently shown a preliminary pullback, similar to the risk of stock market corrections after the peaks in mid-2018 and late 2021.

  • Institutional LeverageImplied Leverage of Hedge Funds and Risk Parity Funds

    Estimates implied leverage through the ratio of fund return volatility to the return volatility of underlying assets.

    Risk parity fund leverage fell notably after reaching a more than decade high in mid-May; hedge fund leverage has risen since 2023, but is not extreme on a historical comparison, and evidence of peaking remains preliminary.

  • Bond Supply and DemandGlobal Bond Supply-Demand Balance Framework

    Breaks down demand sources such as central banks, retail funds, commercial banks, official reserves, pensions, and insurance institutions, and compares them with net issuance supply.

    Global bond demand in 2026 is expected to be broadly flat versus 2025, while supply rises by about $300bn, resulting in a deterioration in supply-demand balance of about $300bn.

Asset mapping & comparison

Structured mapping from thesis to named assets (strengths, weaknesses, peers, risks).

  • Technology stocks
    The main asset affected by cooling retail leverage
    Strengths
    Previously supported by leveraged ETF rebalancing, retail options buying, and strong risk appetite.
    Weaknesses
    Options buying and margin leverage have retreated from extreme levels, weakening marginal flow impulse.
    Comparison
    Historically, after similar options peaks in November 2021 and October 2025, technology stocks underwent multi-month corrections.
    Risks
    If retail options and margin leverage continue to decline, technology stocks may face more pronounced pullbacks.
  • Global bonds
    Affected by the slight deterioration in 2026 supply-demand balance
    Strengths
    Retail bond fund inflows remain solid, and official reserve manager demand has upside risk.
    Weaknesses
    Demand from commercial banks, pensions, and insurance institutions is weaker than previously expected, while supply is increasing.
    Comparison
    This estimate puts the deterioration in supply and demand at about $0.3tr, higher than the previous estimate of about $0.2tr.
    Risks
    If demand comes in further below expectations or supply is revised higher, yields may remain under pressure.
  • Risk parity funds
    A relatively clear signal of declining leverage
    Strengths
    Previously, rising leverage supported exposure to risk assets.
    Weaknesses
    Implied leverage has fallen since the historical high in mid-May, which may reduce demand for risk-asset allocation.
    Comparison
    This signal is clearer than the evidence of peaking leverage in hedge funds and banks.
    Risks
    If rising volatility triggers further deleveraging, it could amplify cross-asset volatility.
  • Banks and hedge funds
    Signs of leverage peaking remain preliminary
    Strengths
    Current leverage levels are still below pre-2008 financial crisis norms and are not yet historical extremes.
    Weaknesses
    The uptrend in leverage since 2023 may be slowing.
    Comparison
    The pullback in risk parity fund and retail leverage is more evident, while evidence for banks and hedge funds is weaker.
    Risks
    If a peak is confirmed later, it may reinforce market concerns about an institutional deleveraging cycle.

Key data

  • Global scale of leveraged ETFs$247bnThe report says leveraged ETFs are usually tilted toward technology themes and have recently amplified gains in technology stocks.
  • Peak net purchases of single-stock call options by small retail customersnearly 14 million contractsReached a high on June 5, close to the historical highs of October 2025 and November 2021.
  • Risk parity fund leveragePulled back after reaching a more than decade high in mid-MayThe report believes signs of a peak in risk parity fund leverage are clearer than for hedge funds and banks.
  • G4 central bank net purchases in 2026about -$1.2trAn improvement of about $0.1tr versus 2025 demand, but still negative for bond demand.
  • 2026 pace of bond fund inflowsannualized slightly above $1.4trRetail bond fund inflows are stronger than the roughly $1.4tr pace in 2024 and 2025, but duration support is weakening.
  • Change in G4 commercial bank bond demand in 2026about $0.3tr worse than 2025The purchase pace so far in 2026 is about $0.8tr annualized, below about $1.1tr in 2025.
  • Global net bond supply in 2026about $4.9trA slight increase in spread-product supply is broadly offset by a slight decline in government supply.
  • Magnitude of deterioration in global bond supply and demandabout $0.3trThe report previously estimated about $0.2tr and has now revised it up to about $0.3tr.
  • Implied impact on Global Agg yieldsabout 15-20bpThis impact is smaller than the year-to-date rise in Global Agg yields in 2026.

Impact & implications

In terms of investment implications, the peaking of retail leverage and risk parity leverage weakens the marginal buying support that had previously underpinned risk assets, with technology stocks especially vulnerable; however, because corporate and household leverage has declined, the report does not believe this will immediately translate into broad macro vulnerability. In the bond market, the slight deterioration in 2026 supply and demand is more a mild yield-level pressure than a major unpriced shock.

Risks

  • The risk for technology stocks is that continued declines in retail options buying and margin-account leverage could reverse the rally momentum previously driven by leveraged capital.
  • If risk parity funds continue to deleverage in a rising-volatility environment, multi-asset drawdowns could be amplified.
  • The risk for global bonds is that demand from commercial banks, pensions, insurance institutions, or official reserves could fall short of expectations, while net issuance supply could exceed current estimates.
  • Some leverage indicators in the report are proxy variables and may be affected by data lags, sample coverage, and changes in asset volatility.
  • Official reserve data such as COFER has not yet been released, so there is still revision risk around bond demand from foreign-exchange reserve managers.

What to watch

  • Whether net purchases of single-stock call options by small OCC customers continue to retreat from the June 5 peak.
  • Changes in NYSE net debit balance in margin accounts relative to S&P 500 market capitalization.
  • Whether implied leverage in risk parity funds continues to decline after the mid-May peak.
  • Whether proxy indicators for hedge fund and bank leverage move from a preliminary peak to a clear decline.
  • The duration structure of global bond fund inflows, especially whether the share of short-duration funds continues to rise.
  • The pace of G4 commercial bank bond purchases, loan growth, and the share of bonds in total assets.
  • Whether global net bond issuance supply in 2026 remains around $4.9tr.
  • Whether Global Agg yields have already fully reflected the roughly 15-20bp pressure from worsening supply and demand.
Zhejiang ICP No. 2022035445-5
Disclaimer: Market data, charts, indicators, research views, and other information provided on this website are intended solely for information display, research communication, and educational reference. They should not be regarded as personalized investment advice, securities recommendations, trading instructions, solicitations, or guarantees of return. While we strive to improve the reliability of our data and content, such information may still be subject to delays, errors, incompleteness, or untimely updates due to source differences, methodological limitations, system processing, or market volatility. Users should exercise independent judgment based on their own circumstances and bear all risks and responsibilities arising from the use of this website.

Settings

Sign in to view recent logins