Quick Summary
Covering the latest research from top Wall Street investment banks

AI server ODMs benefit from rising CSP capital spending and increasing architectural complexity

Institution
JPMorgan
Date
2026-04-22
Authors
Albert Hung, Samik Chatterjee, CFA, Gokul Hariharan, Anthony Leng
Company
-
Ticker
-
Industry
Technology - Hardware; AI server ODM; Data Center; Semiconductor
Rating
Overweight for Celestica, Hon Hai Precision, Quanta Computer Inc., Wiwynn Corp
BullishLow confidenceThe report believes that capital expenditure by leading U.S. CSPs still has room for upward revision, and that rising AI server architectural complexity will strengthen the design and scale advantages of leading ODMs, with profits expected to increase alongside shipment volume and MVA growth.
AuthorsAlbert Hung, Samik Chatterjee, CFA, Gokul Hariharan, Anthony Leng
Target priceCelestica $410; Hon Hai Precision NT$270; Wiwynn Corp NT$5,900
CoverageUnited States、Asia-Pacific
Asset classesEquity
Business segmentsAI server ODM system integration、GPU modules、Nvidia GPU server systems、AMD GPU server systems、ASIC servers
Research firm divisions/subsidiariesJPMorgan(Other)

AI summary card

AI server ODMs benefit from rising CSP capital spending and increasing architectural complexity

JPMorgan believes AI server ODMs remain key beneficiaries of CSP AI infrastructure expansion; Hon Hai and Quanta are better positioned in the NVL72 supply chain, while Celestica and Wiwynn lead in ASIC servers.

The report lists Celestica, Hon Hai Precision, Quanta Computer Inc., and Wiwynn Corp all as Overweight.
AI server ODMCSP capital spendingNVL72ASIC serversGPU modulesSupply chain concentration
  • 2026 capital spending guidance for the top four U.S. CSPs exceeds US$650 billion, up from about US$415 billion in 2025, with the incremental spending mainly going to higher GPU and memory content.
  • NVL72 rack shipments are expected to rise to about 65,000 to 70,000 units, significantly above the prior year's roughly 25,000 to 27,000 units.
  • Hon Hai and Quanta are the core NVL72 suppliers for major CSPs, with shares of about 40%-45% and 25%-30%, respectively.
  • ASIC servers are more customized and have lower silicon ASPs, which is usually more favorable for ODM margins; TPU/Trillium and T3 are key highlights.
  • Complex design capabilities, frequent product upgrades, and NPI experience continue to concentrate the competitive landscape among a small number of leading vendors.

Report interpretation

Overview

This report updates the market share matrix for AI server ODM systems and modules. JPMorgan believes ODMs, as system integrators, are key enablers for cloud service providers building AI infrastructure. Although server ODM margins may gradually decline over time as silicon ASPs rise, absolute profits are still expected to increase, driven by shipment volume and MVA growth.

Core views

The core view is that U.S. CSP capital spending faces upside risk, while demand for AI server modules and architectural innovation remains supported; Nvidia's GPU supply chain is generally stable, but Wiwynn has an opportunity for share gains as a second source for VR200 at Oracle and Meta; and ASIC servers have more durable ODM economics due to higher customization and lower customer switching risk. Hon Hai and Quanta are the top picks in the NVL72 supply chain, while Celestica and Wiwynn lead in ASIC servers.

Analysis framework

The report cross-validates the competitive landscape of AI server ODMs through CSP capital spending, NVL72 rack shipments, GPU module supplier matrices, Nvidia and AMD GPU system supply chains, ASIC server supply chains, and historical stock ratings.

Methodology notes

  • Supply chain matrix analysisAI server ODM market share matrix

    Break down primary and secondary ODM supplier relationships by customer, architecture, and system level

    The report separates GPU modules, Nvidia GPU systems, AMD GPU systems, and ASIC servers, comparing primary suppliers, secondary suppliers, and potential new suppliers across different CSP-ODM relationships.

  • Capital spending analysisTop-4 U.S. CSP capex tracking

    Use cloud service provider capital spending as a leading indicator for AI server demand

    The report uses capital spending guidance and free cash flow ceilings for the top four U.S. CSPs to estimate potential upward revision room, and maps that to demand for GPUs, memory, and advanced server modules.

Asset mapping & comparison

Structured mapping from thesis to named assets (strengths, weaknesses, peers, risks).

  • Hon Hai Precision (2317.TW)
    Core supplier of NVL72 and AI server systems
    Strengths
    It has the highest share in the NVL72 supply chains of major CSPs and possesses execution capabilities in GPU modules and system design.
    Weaknesses
    Server ODM margins may come under pressure as silicon ASPs rise.
    Comparison
    The report lists Hon Hai and Quanta as the top picks in the NVL72 supply chain.
    Risks
    CSP capital spending revisions may disappoint, supply chain share may be diluted by second-source suppliers, and architecture transitions may bring execution risk.
  • Quanta Computer Inc. (2382.TW)
    Major supplier of NVL72 and ASIC servers for key CSPs
    Strengths
    It holds important primary-supplier positions in Nvidia systems for customers such as Microsoft, Meta, Amazon, and Google, and has broad coverage in the ASIC server matrix.
    Weaknesses
    It still faces competition from Hon Hai, Jabil, Wiwynn, and others in some customers and architectures.
    Comparison
    Together with Hon Hai, it forms the top-pick group in the NVL72 supply chain.
    Risks
    Second-source expansion, customer platform transitions, and capital spending volatility may affect share.
  • Wiwynn Corp (6669.TW)
    Leading ODM in ASIC servers and a potential second source for VR200
    Strengths
    It has potential share upside as a second source for VR200 at Oracle and Meta, and holds a leading position in ASIC server programs such as T2/T3.
    Weaknesses
    It remains a potential or secondary supplier in parts of the GPU system supply chain.
    Comparison
    The report views Wiwynn and Celestica as leaders in the ASIC server segment.
    Risks
    The pace of second-source onboarding, customer certification timelines, and competitor capacity expansion may affect incremental upside.
  • Celestica (CLS)
    Leading ODM in ASIC servers
    Strengths
    It has design and manufacturing advantages in ASIC server programs such as L6-L11 and benefits from more customized server demand.
    Weaknesses
    Its direct exposure in the primary Nvidia GPU rack supplier matrix is less prominent than that of Hon Hai and Quanta.
    Comparison
    The report lists Celestica and Wiwynn as leaders among ASIC plays.
    Risks
    ASIC project timing, customer concentration, and ODM manufacturing diffusion to second- or third-source suppliers may affect returns.
  • Wistron
    Supplier of GPU modules and Dell-related GPU systems
    Strengths
    It has an important position in Nvidia OAM/UBB and AMD MI300/MI400 modules and is deeply tied to Dell's L10 systems.
    Weaknesses
    It is highly dependent on Dell, and Dell is bringing in Compal as an incremental supplier.
    Comparison
    Compared with Hon Hai and Quanta, Wistron is more focused on modules and specific customer supply chains.
    Risks
    Dell supply chain diversification, module design competition, and certification risks for new entrants.

Key data

  • 2026 capital spending guidance for the top four U.S. CSPsMore than US$650 billionThe report states this is above about US$415 billion in 2025, with the roughly US$245 billion increase mainly used for higher GPU and memory content.
  • Potential capex implied by the FCF ceilingAbout US$750 billion to US$800 billionThe report believes capex budgets may move toward this implied upper limit over the next few quarters.
  • NVL72 rack shipmentsAbout 65,000 to 70,000 unitsThe prior year was about 25,000 to 27,000 units.
  • Hon Hai NVL72 shareAbout 40%-45%The report says Hon Hai is one of the main NVL72 rack suppliers for major CSPs.
  • Quanta NVL72 shareAbout 25%-30%The report says Quanta is also a core NVL72 supplier for major CSPs.
  • JPM 2026 estimated total NVL72 shipments68,500 unitsTable 1 shows 28,900 units for Hon Hai, 18,000 for Quanta, 14,000 for Wistron, and 7,600 for Others in 2026.

Impact & implications

For investors, the key driver for AI server ODMs is shifting from simple server assembly to complex system design, module integration, NPI experience, and supply chain execution. Upward revisions to capital spending, NVL72 volume ramp, ASIC platform iterations, and rising server architectural complexity all support leading ODMs in maintaining market share and growing absolute profits.

Risks

  • Upward revisions to U.S. CSP capital spending may fall short of expectations, leading to lower-than-expected AI server orders and module demand.
  • Server ODM margins may gradually decline as silicon ASPs rise.
  • As manufacturing scales up, production may diffuse to second- or third-source suppliers, weakening the market share of leading suppliers.
  • New AI architectures such as LPU, CPX, and Vera CPU rack raise the bar for innovation and execution, while also increasing project delivery complexity.
  • Customer platform iterations, NPI timing, and uncertainty in supply chain certification may affect revenue recognition and profit realization.

What to watch

  • Quarterly results of major ODMs and management guidance on AI server orders.
  • Whether visibility on the 2027 CSP capital spending cycle improves.
  • Whether NVL72 rack shipments reach the expected roughly 65,000 to 70,000 units.
  • Whether Oracle and Meta formally introduce Wiwynn as a second source for VR200.
  • The ramp-up pace of TPU/Trillium, T3, and other ASIC server platforms.
  • Whether rising server architectural complexity continues to support the design premium and share concentration of leading ODMs.
Zhejiang ICP No. 2022035445-5
Disclaimer: Market data, charts, indicators, research views, and other information provided on this website are intended solely for information display, research communication, and educational reference. They should not be regarded as personalized investment advice, securities recommendations, trading instructions, solicitations, or guarantees of return. While we strive to improve the reliability of our data and content, such information may still be subject to delays, errors, incompleteness, or untimely updates due to source differences, methodological limitations, system processing, or market volatility. Users should exercise independent judgment based on their own circumstances and bear all risks and responsibilities arising from the use of this website.

Settings

Sign in to view recent logins