Citi's global macro portfolio delivered positive returns in Q2 but remains cautious about near-term FOMC and AI risks
AI summary card
Citi's global macro portfolio delivered positive returns in Q2 but remains cautious about near-term FOMC and AI risks
The GMS portfolio rose 1.38% in Q2 and 1.31% year to date, with equity trades making a strong contribution, but was dragged down in June by a hawkish Fed, short-dollar positions and U.S. rate-steepening trades.
- The GMS tactical portfolio returned 1.38% in Q2, with annualized volatility of 7.2%, an information ratio of 0.38 and a Calmar ratio of 0.56.
- The portfolio performed strongly in April and May but retraced in June after failing to adapt in time to a more hawkish FOMC and a stickier U.S. rates environment.
- Equity trades performed best, with KOSPI and HGBs the main positive contributors year to date; the largest losses came from short USDJPY, the USD Dec26-Dec27 steepener and the USD 2s10s steepener.
- Current risk budget is light, with a preference for cyclical assets such as copper and SX5E, as well as selective carry trades in the United Kingdom, Canada, HGBs and Colombian TES.
- The GAA medium-term asset-allocation portfolio rose 17 basis points in Q2, benefiting mainly from U.S. and EM Asia equities, while Japanese equities and gold detracted from performance.
Report interpretation
Overview
Citi's Global Macro Strategy Portfolio Report Q2 2026 reviews the performance, attribution, closed-trade retrospectives and current positioning views of the GMS tactical macro portfolio and the GAA medium-term asset-allocation portfolio during the second quarter of 2026. The GMS portfolio rose 1.38% in Q2 and was up 1.31% year to date as of July 3, 2026; the GAA portfolio rose 17 basis points in Q2 but remained down 12 basis points year to date. The report's overall view is that the near-term macro environment remains unclear, particularly because of uncertainty surrounding the FOMC path and AI supply-chain cost pressures. The portfolio therefore maintains relatively low risk while selectively holding cyclical assets, long equity positions and rates relative-value trades.
Core views
The core conclusions are as follows: First, AI risks have increased. Citi has closed its largest year-to-date contributor, long KOSPI, but retains long NDX as signs of broader participation in the U.S. equity rally emerge. Second, weaker-than-expected employment data and more balanced Fedspeak have reduced the near-term probability of further Fed hikes, so rebounds in the dollar and U.S. Treasury yields may pause. Third, improving global cyclical momentum supports long copper and long SX5E. Fourth, a more neutral U.S. view keeps overall portfolio risk light, while the portfolio retains more idiosyncratic rates trades, including U.K. and Canadian front-end carry, long HGBs and long TES 2031s versus a 2y IBR payer.
Analysis framework
The report uses a framework combining portfolio performance review, return attribution, risk budgeting, major-index beta, closed-trade retrospectives and itemized explanations of current positions. GMS simulates the performance of trade recommendations using notional principal and portfolio risk units, with a standard drawdown budget of $1 million per trade and a total portfolio risk budget of $100 million. It also evaluates strategy effectiveness using the P/L, portfolio contribution, entry timing, objectives and risk commentary for open trades.
Methodology notes
Tracking global macro trade recommendations through a model portfolio
Citi measures GMS trade-recommendation performance using notional principal, per-trade drawdown budgets and portfolio risk units, assessing returns, volatility, drawdowns and attribution in a manner closer to a real portfolio.
Information ratio and Calmar ratio
The report evaluates return quality using annualized volatility, maximum drawdown, the information ratio and the Calmar ratio; Q2 figures were 7.2% annualized volatility, an information ratio of 0.38 and a Calmar ratio of 0.56.
Cross-asset return attribution
The report decomposes performance across equities, rates, FX, commodities and credit, and uses major-index betas to describe the portfolio's exposures to USTs, 60/40, MSCI World, oil and the USD.
Asset mapping & comparison
Structured mapping from thesis to named assets (strengths, weaknesses, peers, risks).
- NDXRemain long
- Strengths
- The AI trade retains momentum, the U.S. equity rally is broadening, and the historical frequency of one-year gains exceeding digital-option strike levels supports a positive expected-value assessment.
- Weaknesses
- Rising AI supply-chain costs could affect hyperscaler capital expenditure.
- Comparison
- Unlike the closed KOSPI position, NDX remains a core long equity position.
- Risks
- AI-flation concerns, technology-equity valuation corrections and higher macro rates.
- CopperLong
- Strengths
- The energy transition and AI infrastructure buildout provide structural demand support, while improving global cyclical momentum is also favorable.
- Weaknesses
- The current copper digital call-option trade remains loss-making, with theta decay weighing on P/L.
- Comparison
- More exposed than gold to an improvement in the cycle; gold performed poorly in an environment of a stronger dollar and higher rates.
- Risks
- Weaker-than-expected global growth, a stronger dollar, crowded positioning or option expiry losses.
- SX5E / VG1Long European equities
- Strengths
- The equity pullback in early June was viewed as a technical deleveraging event, while improving global cyclical momentum supported a rapid rebound.
- Weaknesses
- European equities remain exposed to global risk appetite and macro shocks.
- Comparison
- Together with long U.S. equities, expresses improving equity-market breadth and a recovery in cyclical momentum.
- Risks
- Another deleveraging of risk assets, weaker European growth or policy shocks.
- HGBsLong Hungarian government bonds
- Strengths
- A Tisza election victory opened a path toward the release of EU funds, potentially reducing Hungary's asset risk premium and supporting the long end of the bond curve.
- Weaknesses
- The trade is affected by political developments and fiscal execution.
- Comparison
- One of the main positive contributors year to date, outperforming most directional FX and U.S. rates trades.
- Risks
- Slower-than-expected progress on EU funds, a widening fiscal deficit or a rebound in inflation.
- TES 2031s vs 2y IBRLong Colombian TES and hedged/relative to a 2-year IBR payer
- Strengths
- The first-round result of Colombia's presidential election indicated a shift to the right, increasing the probability of market-friendly and fiscally orthodox policies and supporting curve flattening.
- Weaknesses
- Inflation remains high, and the path toward policy easing is not fully certain.
- Comparison
- An idiosyncratic EM fixed-income trade emphasized in the report, distinct from broader directional dollar and U.S. rates risks.
- Risks
- El Niño driving food prices higher, delayed rate cuts or a reversal in the political outcome.
- UK front-end / SFI Z6 vs SFRZ6Receive carry in the U.K. front end
- Strengths
- BoE policy is already in restrictive territory and market pricing reflects tightening; once the oil-price shock fades, there may be more room for rate-cut pricing.
- Weaknesses
- If U.K. inflation or wages reaccelerate, front-end rates may struggle to decline.
- Comparison
- Together with Canadian front-end carry, expresses a relatively more dovish non-U.S. developed-market view versus the United States.
- Risks
- A hawkish BoE, sticky inflation and sterling-related political risk.
- Canada front-end / CORRA Z6 vs SFRZ6Receive carry in the Canadian front end
- Strengths
- The BoC is relatively more dovish than its G10 peers, with attention focused on excess supply, USMCA renegotiation risks and subdued core inflation.
- Weaknesses
- The trade's current P/L is slightly negative.
- Comparison
- Similar to the U.K. front-end trade, it is a selective developed-market carry trade relative to the United States.
- Risks
- A rebound in Canadian employment or inflation, or delayed BoC rate cuts.
- GoldQ2 detractor
- Strengths
- Can serve as a hedge during periods of conflict or risk aversion.
- Weaknesses
- Performs poorly in an environment of higher rates and a stronger dollar and was the largest detractor from GAA performance in Q2.
- Comparison
- The report favors base metals over gold.
- Risks
- Gold could remain under pressure if the dollar continues to strengthen or real rates rise.
Key data
- GMS Q2 return+1.38%Second-quarter 2026 performance of the tactical macro portfolio.
- GMS year-to-date return+1.31%As of 2026-07-03.
- Annualized volatility7.2%Used to calculate risk-adjusted returns.
- Maximum drawdown-4.89%GMS maximum drawdown disclosed in the report.
- Information ratio0.38Calculated based on Q2 portfolio performance.
- Calmar ratio0.56Measures returns relative to maximum drawdown.
- GAA Q2 return+17bpsSecond-quarter performance of the medium-term asset-allocation portfolio.
- Fully closed trades in Q219 tradesFive profitable trades and 14 loss-making trades were closed.
- Total P/L of current open tradesapproximately +$2.10mThe table shows total P/L of approximately $2.098 million and a portfolio contribution of approximately 2.10%.
Impact & implications
The investment implication is that overall risk should not be increased excessively amid uncertainty over the Fed's path and rising AI risks. However, if rebounds in the dollar and U.S. Treasury yields pause, copper, European equities, NDX and selected emerging- and developed-market rates trades may still have room to perform. At the portfolio level, the preference is for selective, idiosyncratic and relative-value opportunities rather than indiscriminate broad additions to risk assets.
Risks
- Futures trading entails a significant risk of loss.
- The FOMC path is unclear, and a continued hawkish stance by the Fed could again weigh on FX and rates trades.
- Rising AI supply-chain costs could weaken hyperscaler capital expenditure and negatively affect AI-related equity trades.
- A stronger dollar and sticky U.S. rates could weigh on copper, gold, non-U.S. equities and carry trades.
- Geopolitical developments and oil-price volatility related to conflicts in the Middle East could alter cross-asset correlations.
- Option trades face the risks of expiring out of the money, theta decay and structural losses.
- Trades driven by political events depend on elections, fiscal policy and policy implementation, creating a risk of reversal in outcomes.
What to watch
- Whether subsequent FOMC communication, U.S. employment data and inflation data validate a more balanced Fed path.
- Whether the rebound in the dollar and 10-year U.S. Treasury yields genuinely pauses.
- AI supply-chain costs, hyperscaler capex and changes in U.S. equity-market breadth.
- Whether copper prices can be supported by the energy transition, AI infrastructure and global cyclical momentum.
- Policy and political catalysts for rates trades in the United Kingdom, Canada, Hungary and Colombia.
- Relative performance of NDX, SX5E, EM Asia equities and Japanese equities.
- The path and risk controls for open trades ahead of multiple option expiries from August through December.