Cloud Giants' Backlog Reaches $2 Trillion, 2026 Capex Raised to $770 Billion
AI summary card
Cloud Giants' Backlog Reaches $2 Trillion, 2026 Capex Raised to $770 Billion
Jefferies points out that driven by AI demand, major cloud vendors' Q1 order backlog surged, 2026 capex expectations largely raised, Google Cloud growth leading, while Amazon and Microsoft show compelling value.
- Total Cloud Order Backlog (Backlog) Increased by $376 Billion QoQ to ~$2 Trillion
- 2026 Top 5 Cloud Vendor Capital Expenditure Expectation Raised 8% to $770 Billion, Up 74% YoY
- Google GCP Revenue Growth 70%, Significant Market Share Gain; AWS Growth Accelerated to 28%
- Despite Massive AI Investment, Major Cloud Vendor Margins Still Expanded
- Anthropic's New Annual Recurring Revenue (ARR) This Year Accounts for Half of the Industry
Report interpretation
Overview
This report summarizes Jefferies' joint analyst conference call minutes regarding Q1 2026 hyperscalers, data centers, and power sectors. Key conclusions indicate AI infrastructure construction is still in early stages, with demand far exceeding supply. Order backlog totals reached approx. $2 trillion for major cloud vendors (Google, Amazon, Microsoft, Meta, Oracle), justifying continued massive capital expenditure. The institution raised 2026 combined capex expectations to $770 billion and supports the 'Compute equals Revenue' logic, maintaining buy ratings on relevant leaders.
Core views
Demand side shows explosive growth, order backlog (Backlog) becomes key indicator to measure future revenue. First quarter main cloud vendor total order backlog increased quarterly by $376 billion to about $2 trillion. Among them, Google contributed the most, single quarter increase of $225 billion; Amazon increased $120 billion (if including Anthropic transaction reaches $220 billion). This huge backlog volume indicates that current capital expenditure is not only not excessive, but far lagging behind actual needs. Performance among cloud vendors diverged, with Google Cloud (GCP) becoming the biggest highlight. GCP first quarter revenue growth as high as 70%, market share significantly improved, and cloud business margins nearly doubled to about 33% over past four quarters. Amazon AWS growth accelerated 4 percentage points to 28%, operating margin expanded to 38%, reflecting its AI, fulfillment, and utilization efficiency flywheel effect. Microsoft Azure grew 39% (constant currency), met guidance upper limit, expected second half to have gentle acceleration, its overall operating margin expanded to 46.3%. Capital expenditure (Capex) ramp-up continues, and scale is surprising. Based on Q1 reports, Jefferies raised 2026 top 5 cloud vendors (Big 3 + Meta & Oracle) capital expenditure expectation by $52 billion (increase 8%) to $770 billion, year-over-year growth rate maintained at high position of 74%. Specifically, Microsoft raised 2026 guidance to $190 billion (partially affected by component price increases); Amazon maintained $200 billion guidance, emphasizing cost advantages brought by self-developed Trainium chips; Meta raised guidance to $125-145 billion; Google raised guidance to $180-190 billion, and announced 2027 capital expenditure will "significantly increase". Revenue growth of AI model vendors is staggering, further confirming urgency of compute demand. Anthropic added annual recurring revenue (ARR) exceeding $31 billion in first four months of this year, accounting for more than half of ARR new additions in 63 public software companies covered by Jefferies (except Microsoft) in full 2025. OpenAI first quarter revenue and usage annualized growth reached 80x, expected this year compute cost expenditure reaches $50 billion. These unlisted giants' wild expansion directly translates to rigid demand for cloud vendor infrastructure.
Analysis framework
Institution adopts a method combining 'top-down' industry sentiment tracking with 'bottom-up' company fundamental verification. First, through aggregating head cloud vendors' order backlogs (Backlog) and capital expenditure guidance, judging industry overall supply-demand gap and investment cycle position. Second, dissecting each company's revenue growth, market share changes and margin performance, assessing evolution of competitive landscape (such as GCP rise). Finally, through tracking AI native application vendors' (such as Anthropic, OpenAI) compute procurement behavior and income explosiveness, cross-verifying authenticity and sustainability of cloud vendor upstream demand. This analytical framework emphasizes direct transmission logic of 'Compute = Revenue', and constraining effect of supply chain bottlenecks (such as Power, GPU) on capital expenditure scale.
Methodology notes
Supply-Demand Framework
Report compares cloud vendor order backlogs (demand proxy variable) with capital expenditure (supply proxy variable), pointing out current AI computing market is in severe shortage of supply and demand state, demand growth speed far faster than supply capacity construction speed.
Capital Expenditure & Free Cash Flow
Although significant capital expenditure increase may suppress short-term free cash flow, report emphasizes high order backlog predicts future strong cash inflow, and current margins still expanding, indicating investment efficiency not diluted due to scale expansion.
EV/EBITDA Multiple Comparison
Report uses EV/EBITDA multiple comparison for Amazon (13x) and Google (19x), believes Amazon has valuation discount, providing better risk-return ratio, while Google although valuation higher possesses stronger AI flywheel effect.
Asset mapping & comparison
Structured mapping from thesis to named assets (strengths, weaknesses, peers, risks).
- Alphabet (GOOGL.US)Benefit: GCP Growth Leads, Backlog Surges, Significant AI Flywheel Effect
- Strengths
- GCP Market Share Fastest Increase, Cloud Margins Doubled, TPU Ecosystem Mature
- Weaknesses
- Valuation Relatively Higher (19x EV/EBITDA)
- Comparison
- Compared to peers, strongest growth momentum, but valuation premium requires performance continual realization
- Risks
- Capital Expenditure Execution Risk, Intensified Competition
- Amazon (AMZN.US)Benefit: AWS Growth Accelerated, Self-developed Chips Bring Cost Advantage, Valuation Attractive
- Strengths
- Trainium Chips Lower Compute Costs, High Operational Efficiency, Valuation Discount (13x EV/EBITDA)
- Weaknesses
- Market Share Slight Decline
- Comparison
- Best Risk-Return Ratio, Suitable for Value Investors
- Risks
- Retail Business Fluctuations, Cloud Competition Pressure
- Microsoft (MSFT.US)Benefit: Azure Steady Growth, Deep Enterprise Customer Base
- Strengths
- M365 & Azure Synergy, Powerful Enterprise Channels, High Margins
- Weaknesses
- Booking Growth Weaker Relative to Peers
- Comparison
- Highest Stability, but Burst Potential Slightly Inferior to Google
- Risks
- Component Price Increases Impact Capital Expenditure Efficiency
- CoreWeave (CRWV.US)Benefit: As Specialized AI Cloud Service Provider, Directly Benefits from Compute Shortage
- Strengths
- Focus on GPU Compute Leasing, Close Relationship with NVIDIA
- Weaknesses
- Scale Smaller Than Hyperscale Cloud Vendors
- Comparison
- Greater Elasticity, but Risk Resistance Weaker Than Giants
- Risks
- Dependence on Single Hardware Vendor, Customer Concentration Risk
Key data
- Total Cloud Backlog~$2 TrillionIncreased $376B QoQ
- Expected 2026 Capital Expenditure$770 BillionRaised $52B, 74% YoY Growth
- Google GCP Revenue Growth70%Largest Market Share Gain, Accelerated 16 Percentage Points
- Amazon AWS Revenue Growth28%Accelerated 4 Percentage Points, Operating Margin ~38%
- Microsoft Azure Revenue Growth39%Constant Currency, Met Guidance Upper Limit
- Anthropic YTD New ARR~$31 BillionOnly Used 4 Months, Over Half of Full Industry Last Year New Total
Impact & implications
Report believes AI investment cycle remains complete and in early stage, demand exceeds supply fundamental unchanged. For cloud vendors, huge order backlog provides high visibility for future revenue growth, despite high capital expenditure, profit margin expansion proves scale effect and operational efficiency improvement. For Power and Data Center REITs sector, large projects approved at 9-10GW scale (such as Wyoming and Utah projects) indicates infrastructure bottlenecks alleviating via policy support and new capacity construction, beneficial to related power utilities and digital infrastructure companies. Investors should focus on those able to efficiently convert capital expenditure into revenue, and occupy market share advantage in AI wave leader enterprises.
Risks
- Component price increases causing capital expenditure exceed expectations
- AI demand growth slowdown, causing backlog conversion below expectations
- Power supply bottlenecks limiting data center expansion speed
- Potential restrictions of regulatory policies on AI development
What to watch
- Whether Azure and AWS growth accelerates further in second half of 2026
- Specific scale of Google 2027 capital expenditure 'Significant Increase'
- Progress on compute procurement contracts for AI-native vendors like Anthropic and OpenAI
- Construction progress and power access status of large data center projects (e.g., Wyoming, Utah)