Quick Summary
Covering the latest research from top Wall Street investment banks

Bernstein screens 17 top Asia quantitative + fundamental picks for 2H26

Institution
Bernstein
Date
2026-07-27
Authors
Rupal Agarwal, Neil Beveridge, Ph.D., David Dai, CFA, Jay Huang, Ph.D., Mark Li, Qingyuan Lin, Ph.D., Miki Sogi, Ph.D., Alex Wang, CFA, Robin Zhu, Cheng Zhang, CFA, CQF
Company
-
Ticker
-
Industry
Asia Pacific multi-sector equity strategy; dominated by technology and semiconductors
Rating
Outperform basket
BullishLow confidenceThe report argues that Asian stocks simultaneously endorsed by the quantitative model and fundamental recommendations have stronger excess return potential; the previous portfolio significantly outperformed MSCI Asia in 1H26, and historical backtests also show this portfolio approach outperforms standalone quantitative or standalone fundamental strategies.
AuthorsRupal Agarwal, Neil Beveridge, Ph.D., David Dai, CFA, Jay Huang, Ph.D., Mark Li, Qingyuan Lin, Ph.D., Miki Sogi, Ph.D., Alex Wang, CFA, Robin Zhu, Cheng Zhang, CFA, CQF
CoverageAsia-Pacific
Asset classesEquity
Business segmentssemiconductors、memory、semiconductor equipment、industrial technology、China internet、technology hardware、biopharma、video gaming、oil and gas
Research firm divisions/subsidiariesBernstein(Other)

AI summary card

Bernstein screens 17 top Asia quantitative + fundamental picks for 2H26

The report combines the top two quintiles of the Bernstein Alpha Model with fundamental Outperform ratings to select 17 Asia-Pacific stocks, arguing that this disciplined portfolio has consistently outperformed MSCI Asia historically.

The overall strategy stance is positive; all selected stocks are rated Outperform, and the portfolio will be rebalanced every half year.
Asia quantitative strategyquant + fundamental2H26 top picksOutperformsemiconductorsAI demandMSCI Asia
  • The previous Quant + Fundamental portfolio outperformed MSCI Asia by 43.5% on an equal-weighted basis and by 119.3% on a market-cap-weighted basis in 1H26.
  • Since 2013, the Alpha Model's top quintile has delivered 7.0% annualized excess return versus the worst quintile; the portfolio favored by both quant and fundamentals has generated 13.2% annualized alpha.
  • The 17 selected stocks this period span South Korea, China, Hong Kong, Japan, and Australia, with heavy weights in technology and semiconductors.
  • Portfolio construction requires stocks to have a Bernstein analyst Outperform rating and rank in the top two quintiles of the Bernstein Alpha Model; the Asia version does not include a crowding constraint.

Report interpretation

Overview

This is a Bernstein Asia quantitative strategy report centered on combining quantitative model rankings with fundamental analyst ratings to form the 2H26 Asia Quant + Fundamental Portfolio. The report notes that standalone quantitative and standalone fundamental research each have strengths and limitations, but historical portfolio performance is stronger when both provide positive signals at the same time. This period's screen yields 17 stocks across semiconductors, hardware, internet, pharmaceuticals, gaming, and oil and gas, though the portfolio is clearly tilted toward technology and semiconductors overall.

Core views

The core view is that, in Asian equity markets, systematically combining the Bernstein Alpha Model with Bernstein analyst Outperform ratings can improve stock selection hit rates and excess returns. The report highlights that the previous portfolio significantly outperformed MSCI Asia in 1H26 of 2026; since 2020, all 12 equal-weight portfolios published have outperformed the market, while 10 market-cap-weighted portfolios have outperformed. The current selection includes SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO, SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS PREF, SK HYNIX, NAURA, PIOTECH, AMEC, MONTAGE, SUNNY OPTICAL, LUXSHARE, JD.COM, IBIDEN, TOKYO ELECTRON, ADVANTEST, KEYENCE, DAIICHI SANKYO, CAPCOM and SANTOS.

Analysis framework

The report applies a cross-screen between quant and fundamentals: on the quantitative side it uses the Bernstein Alpha Model, focusing on valuation, capital usage, earnings quality, profitability, growth, momentum, industry rotation, and the risk environment; on the fundamental side it uses Bernstein sell-side analyst ratings as the proxy variable for stock selection. The selection criteria are an Outperform rating and placement in the top two quintiles of the Alpha Model. The report then explains the fundamental logic by industry and by company, and lists key drivers such as target prices, valuation metrics, oil price assumptions, memory prices, WFE growth, tester demand, and ABF supply-demand dynamics.

Methodology notes

  • quantamental equity selectionBernstein Quant + Fundamental Portfolio

    Cross-screening of quantitative rankings and fundamental ratings

    It first uses the Bernstein Alpha Model to identify stocks with high quantitative attractiveness, then requires Bernstein fundamental analysts to assign an Outperform rating; to broaden sample size and diversification, the Asia portfolio uses the top two quintiles rather than only the first quintile.

  • quantitative modelBernstein Alpha Model

    A model of expected relative returns over the next 12 months

    The model consists of stock selection, industry or sector rotation, and risk environment components. Its factors cover valuation, capital usage, earnings quality, profitability, growth, and momentum, while distinguishing between risk-behavior differences in developed and emerging markets.

  • risk regimeRisk Aversion Signal

    Assessment of the risk-preference environment

    It uses indicators such as bond spreads, commodity prices, consumer sentiment, market-cap concentration, valuation dispersion, option skew, and the volatility curve to judge whether the market over roughly the next three months is in a risk-off, risk-on, or neutral environment; the report says current U.S. and global risk-aversion signals point to neutral.

Asset mapping & comparison

Structured mapping from thesis to named assets (strengths, weaknesses, peers, risks).

  • SK HYNIX (000660 KS)
    Selected among the 17 Quant + Fundamental top picks; Outperform
    Strengths
    AI demand is tightening memory supply, and DRAM and NAND prices are expected to continue rising; HBM prices may be revised upward in CY27, creating room for earnings upgrades.
    Weaknesses
    Once memory prices reach high levels, weaker end demand and long-term contracts may limit the slope of further price increases.
    Comparison
    Like Samsung, it is a global memory beneficiary; both are valued at about 6.2x one-year forward P/E.
    Risks
    Memory prices peak earlier than expected, AI demand slows, or supply expands faster than expected.
  • SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO (005930 KS) / SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS PREF (005935 KS)
    Selected among the 17 Quant + Fundamental top picks; Outperform
    Strengths
    Benefits from improving DRAM, NAND, and HBM pricing; the report target price is KRW 440,000, and the preferred shares target price is KRW 374,000.
    Weaknesses
    Strategic HBM pricing may rise less than traditional DRAM, and valuation depends on judgments about cyclical peak earnings.
    Comparison
    Together with SK hynix, it benefits from memory supply-demand gaps and AI server demand.
    Risks
    HBM price negotiations disappoint, memory gross margins decline, or AI capex changes.
  • TOKYO ELECTRON (8035 JP)
    Selected among the 17 Quant + Fundamental top picks; Outperform
    Strengths
    Has high exposure to DRAM equipment and benefits from advanced packaging opportunities in bonding, back-end processes, and wafer probing; the report expects EPS growth of 38.7% and 34.6% over the next two years.
    Weaknesses
    Revenue growth may normalize next year.
    Comparison
    Relative to general WFE, the report believes it can outperform the sector in 2026.
    Risks
    WFE cycle downturn, slower memory capacity expansion, or weaker-than-expected advanced packaging demand.
  • ADVANTEST CORP (6857 JP)
    Selected among the 17 Quant + Fundamental top picks; Outperform
    Strengths
    GPU/ASIC accelerator testing demand and rising test complexity support strong expected growth in EXA Scale tester shipments; CPU, silicon photonics, and die-level testing provide potential upside.
    Weaknesses
    Revenue growth slows in the 2027 model.
    Comparison
    More directly positioned in the AI hardware testing chain, with a target price of ¥39,200.
    Risks
    AI accelerator shipments miss expectations, test insertion rates decline, or customer capex is delayed.
  • IBIDEN CO (4062 JP)
    Selected among the 17 Quant + Fundamental top picks; Outperform
    Strengths
    Benefits from expected ABF substrate supply-demand shortages in 2027-2028 and a CPU revival; server CPU scale is expected to expand in 2026-2030.
    Weaknesses
    Current forecasts do not yet fully incorporate yield pressure from larger and more complex substrates.
    Comparison
    Compared with broader semiconductor equipment stocks, Ibiden has more direct exposure to ABF substrate supply and demand.
    Risks
    CPU cycle underperforms expectations, ABF supply expands too quickly, or yield and cost pressures rise.
  • SANTOS (STO AU)
    Selected among the 17 Quant + Fundamental top picks; Outperform
    Strengths
    Oil price assumptions are higher than the market forward curve and consensus expectations; the 2027 free cash flow inflection could lift FCF yield above 10%, allowing the discount to narrow.
    Weaknesses
    Valuation is sensitive to oil prices and project ramp-up.
    Comparison
    A high-conviction name within Asia-Pacific oil & gas E&P, valued using DCF.
    Risks
    Oil prices below assumptions, LNG prices decline, or project execution and capex risks materialize.
  • JD.COM (9618 HK / JD)
    Selected among the 17 Quant + Fundamental top picks; Outperform
    Strengths
    Has an Outperform rating and ranks in the top two quant quintiles; target price HKD 155.00.
    Weaknesses
    The report input does not provide a complete company-level fundamental section.
    Comparison
    As a selected China internet name, it provides sector diversification versus technology hardware and semiconductor stocks.
    Risks
    China consumer recovery is weaker than expected, platform competition, or margin volatility.
  • LUXSHARE PRECISION (002475 CH)
    Selected among the 17 Quant + Fundamental top picks; Outperform
    Strengths
    Target price CNY 86.00; inclusion indicates both quant and fundamentals are positive.
    Weaknesses
    The report input retains only the communications business and other segment headings, with limited detail.
    Comparison
    Within the Asia technology hardware chain, together with Sunny Optical it represents consumer electronics and hardware supply chain exposure.
    Risks
    End-demand, customer concentration, product mix, and margin risks.
  • SUNNY OPTICAL TECH (2382 HK)
    Selected among the 17 Quant + Fundamental top picks; Outperform
    Strengths
    Target price HK$94.00; inclusion indicates both quantitative ranking and fundamental rating are positive.
    Weaknesses
    The report input does not provide a complete company-level fundamental section.
    Comparison
    Like Luxshare, it represents Asia technology hardware exposure.
    Risks
    Volatility in handset and optics demand, competition, and pricing pressure.
  • MONTAGE TECHNOLOGY (688008 CN / 6809 HK)
    Selected among the 17 Quant + Fundamental top picks; Outperform
    Strengths
    Target price CNY 400.00; one of the selected China semiconductor names.
    Weaknesses
    The report input does not provide a complete company-level fundamental section.
    Comparison
    Together with NAURA, PIOTECH, and AMEC, it forms China semiconductor exposure.
    Risks
    Semiconductor cycle, pace of domestic substitution, valuation, and order-conversion risks.
  • NAURA TECH GRP (002371 CH), PIOTECH A (688072 CH), AMEC (688012 CH)
    Selected among the 17 Quant + Fundamental top picks; Outperform
    Strengths
    All are China semiconductor equipment or related supply-chain names, with target prices of CNY 680.00, CNY 580.00, and CNY 500.00 respectively.
    Weaknesses
    For some stocks, current prices in the table are above target prices, yet they are still listed as Outperform; this should be interpreted cautiously in conjunction with the report table methodology and relative-performance columns.
    Comparison
    As a China semiconductor equipment basket, they benefit from localization and capex, but valuation levels differ materially.
    Risks
    Slower capex at domestic foundries, order conversion, technology validation, and valuation compression.
  • KEYENCE CORP (6861 JP), DAIICHI SANKYO CO (4568 JP), CAPCOM CO (9697 JP)
    Selected among the 17 Quant + Fundamental top picks; Outperform
    Strengths
    They represent Japan industrial technology, biopharma, and gaming respectively, providing sector diversification to the portfolio; Keyence target price ¥86,000, Daiichi Sankyo target price ¥4,500, and Capcom target price ¥4,600.
    Weaknesses
    Fundamental details retained in the input are limited.
    Comparison
    Relative to the more semiconductor-heavy list, these names reduce concentration in a single technology cycle.
    Risks
    Japan market valuations, FX, product cycles, drug R&D, and game content cycle risks.

Key data

  • Number of selected stocks17As of July 2026, all must meet both the Outperform rating and top-two-quintile Alpha Model criteria.
  • Previous portfolio relative performanceequal-weight +43.5%; market-cap-weighted +119.3%Relative to MSCI Asia, for the period from January to June 2026.
  • Previous portfolio absolute returnequal-weight 50.4%; market-cap-weighted 140.7%January to June 2026.
  • Long-term Alpha Model performancetop quintile 20-year annualized relative excess return of 6.1%, information ratio 1.35Long-term Asia sample.
  • Difference between best and worst quintiles since 2013+7.0% annualizedMSCI Asia Pacific stock universe.
  • Quant + fundamental first-quintile portfolio alpha13.2% annualizedSince 2013, relative to MSCI AC Asia Pacific.
  • Top two quant quintiles + Outperform portfolio alpha9.4% annualizedExpanded to the top two quintiles to improve portfolio size and diversification.
  • Hit rate since portfolio publicationequal-weight 12/12 outperformed; market-cap-weighted 10/12 outperformedPublished every six months since 2020.
  • Main target pricesSK hynix KRW 3,300,000; Samsung KRW 440,000; Tokyo Electron ¥59,200; Advantest ¥39,200; Ibiden ¥23,900; JD HKD 155.00; Luxshare CNY 86.00; Sunny Optical HK$94.00; Montage CNY 400.00; Santos AUD8.90Target prices are from the report summary table and company sections.
  • Oil price assumptions2026 US$90/bbl; 2027 US$78/bbl; long term US$75/bblUsed for Santos DCF valuation and oil & gas sector views.
  • Semiconductor equipment demand2026 global WFE growth 21%, ex-China WFE growth 25%, DRAM WFE growth 46%Supports the view on semiconductor equipment stocks such as Tokyo Electron.
  • Advantest tester equipment assumption2026 EXA Scale tester shipments up 61% YoY to 2,000 unitsDriven by GPU/ASIC accelerator testing demand and rising complexity.

Impact & implications

The report's implication for portfolio construction is that Asian equity allocation can prioritize the intersection where quantitative factors and fundamental ratings are both positive, rather than simply following a single signal. Because the current list is tilted toward AI, memory, semiconductor equipment, advanced packaging, and high-end hardware, the portfolio is sensitive to the technology cycle, AI capex, memory prices, semiconductor equipment demand, and regional risk appetite. For active investors, the report provides a candidate pool that can be rebalanced semiannually; for risk management, industry concentration, valuation crowding, cyclical peak earnings, and macro risks need to be monitored.

Risks

  • The portfolio is clearly tilted toward technology and semiconductors; if AI capex, memory prices, or the WFE cycle reverse, excess returns could come under pressure.
  • Quantitative models rely on historical relationships and factor effectiveness, and may struggle to capture structural inflection points or exceptional events in time.
  • Fundamental ratings are subjective, and different analysts may reach different conclusions based on the same information.
  • The Asia portfolio does not include a crowding constraint; if selected stocks become crowded trades or overly expensive, drawdown risk may rise.
  • Some target prices, current prices, and relative-performance columns for individual stocks contain cross-currency and identification noise in the table, so users should refer back to the original table for verification.
  • Oil and gas names are sensitive to oil price assumptions; if Brent is below the 2026 assumption of US$90/bbl or below the long-term assumption of US$75/bbl, the Santos investment thesis will be affected.
  • Changes in emerging-market risk appetite, FX, policy, and liquidity may affect Asia portfolio performance.

What to watch

  • The equal-weighted and market-cap-weighted performance of the portfolio versus MSCI Asia in 2H26.
  • The additions and deletions at Bernstein's next semiannual rebalance.
  • DRAM, NAND, and HBM pricing negotiations, especially whether CY27 HBM pricing can achieve the expected increase.
  • Whether global WFE, memory WFE, and advanced-packaging capex match the report's growth assumptions.
  • Advantest EXA Scale tester shipments, GPU/ASIC testing complexity, and CPU-related demand.
  • Santos's free cash flow inflection, ROIC improvement, and actual oil price trajectory.
  • Whether Asia market risk-appetite signals remain neutral or shift toward risk-off and liquidity preference.
Zhejiang ICP No. 2022035445-5
Disclaimer: Market data, charts, indicators, research views, and other information provided on this website are intended solely for information display, research communication, and educational reference. They should not be regarded as personalized investment advice, securities recommendations, trading instructions, solicitations, or guarantees of return. While we strive to improve the reliability of our data and content, such information may still be subject to delays, errors, incompleteness, or untimely updates due to source differences, methodological limitations, system processing, or market volatility. Users should exercise independent judgment based on their own circumstances and bear all risks and responsibilities arising from the use of this website.

Settings

Sign in to view recent logins