Quick Summary
Covering the latest research from top Wall Street investment banks

Goldman Sachs: US investors are increasingly split on Korean memory stocks, but the firm still reiterates Buy on Samsung Electronics and SK Hynix

Institution
Goldman Sachs
Date
2026-04-15
Authors
Giuni Lee, Daiki Takayama, Taeyong Lee
Company
Samsung Electronics; SK Hynix Inc.
Ticker
005930.KS; 005935.KS; 000660.KS
Industry
Korean technology; memory semiconductors
Rating
Buy
BullishLow confidenceThe report reiterates Buy ratings for Samsung Electronics and SK Hynix, arguing that although US investors show greater divergence over the memory cycle, LTA enforceability, and macro risk, storage pricing, profitability, HBM pricing, and potential shareholder return still support a constructive view.
AuthorsGiuni Lee, Daiki Takayama, Taeyong Lee
Target priceSamsung Electronics common stock W285,000; Samsung Electronics preferred stock W220,000; SK Hynix W1,350,000
Asset classesEquity
Business segmentsconventional memory、DRAM、NAND、HBM、smartphones/PCs/servers、mobile OLED
Research firm divisions/subsidiariesGoldman Sachs(Other)

AI summary card

Goldman Sachs: US investors are increasingly split on Korean memory stocks, but the firm still reiterates Buy on Samsung Electronics and SK Hynix

More than 30 US investors have highly concentrated interest in the memory sector, with debate centered on slowing price appreciation, LTA enforceability, HBM share, and supply risk; Goldman Sachs says pricing and earnings resilience still support Buy ratings for SEC and Hynix.

Goldman Sachs reiterates Buy on Samsung Electronics common and preferred shares, with 12-month target prices of W285,000 and W220,000, respectively; it reiterates Buy on SK Hynix with a 12-month target price of W1,350,000.
Korean technologymemory semiconductorsSamsung ElectronicsSK HynixLTAHBMDRAMNANDBuy rating
  • US investors show more divergence on the storage sector than Asian investors, with bears concerned that price acceleration will slow after 2H26, margins are near historical highs, and LTA may signal an approaching cycle peak.
  • Bulls argue the market has already absorbed the near-term price deceleration; memory-company earnings power in this cycle is significantly higher than in prior cycles, and faster book value compounding plus higher ROE could support valuation rerating.
  • Investors are broadly constructive on near-term DRAM and NAND price increases; views for 2027 prices are mixed but mostly imply flat to modest upside.
  • LTA is the core point of contention: most investors are skeptical about its enforceability, while Goldman Sachs views constraints as stronger given extremely tight supply, customer-led renegotiations, and terms such as prepayments, co-investments, and price floors.
  • SEC is relatively preferred by US investors versus Hynix, driven by greater upside from conventional memory exposure, the HBM catch-up story, and closer visibility for shareholder return upside.

Report interpretation

Overview

This report summarizes Goldman Sachs discussion and feedback from more than 30 US investors on Korean technology and the memory sector. Investor focus was concentrated on Samsung Electronics and SK Hynix, and US investors show more pronounced disagreement on storage-sector outlook than their Asian counterparts. Key debate topics include conventional memory and HBM pricing, the real enforceability of LTAs, 2027 price direction, potential incremental supply, China supply, SEC’s chance to gain share in HBM4, and relative preference between the two Korean memory leaders.

Core views

The core view is that although bears worry about decelerating storage price growth after 2Q26, further slowdown in 2H26, margins near historical peaks, LTA potentially marking a cycle top, and shifts in smartphone/PC demand and supplier capex toward more aggressive spending, Goldman Sachs remains constructive. The bull case is that earnings power this cycle is meaningfully higher than prior cycles, ROE is relatively more attractive than P/B, book value could compound quickly, and more binding LTAs could support demand and earnings visibility while reducing volatility, thereby justifying valuation rerating and higher shareholder returns.

Analysis framework

The report mainly uses investor feedback synthesis and company relative comparison, combined with pricing cycles, supply-demand balance, HBM competitive dynamics, LTA terms, valuation methodology, and risk scenarios, to assess the investment attractiveness of Samsung Electronics and SK Hynix.

Methodology notes

  • Valuation methodsEV/EBITDA SOTP

    Samsung Electronics common stock target price

    Goldman Sachs uses a 12-month 2026E EV/EBITDA basis with an SOTP method, arriving at a Samsung Electronics common stock target price of W285,000.

  • Valuation methodsPreferred stock discount model

    Samsung Electronics preferred stock target price

    The 12-month target price for Samsung Electronics preferred stock is W220,000, based on a 23% target discount to common stock derived from a two-factor discount model and the average one-month preferred-to-common discount.

  • Valuation methodsP/B

    SK Hynix target price

    SK Hynix has a 12-month target price of W1,350,000, based on the average 2026E/2027E P/B and applying a target P/B multiple of 2.9x.

  • factor frameworkGS Factor Profile

    Growth, financial returns, valuation multiples and composite percentile

    The GS factor framework measures growth through projected sales, EBITDA, and EPS growth, financial returns through ROE, ROCE, and CROCI, valuation multiples through P/E, P/B, P/D, EV/EBITDA, and EV/FCF, and combines growth, financial returns, and inverse valuation multiples into a composite percentile.

  • M&A frameworkM&A Rank

    Takeover probability score

    Goldman Sachs uses an M&A Rank of 1 to 3 to assess take-private probability, where 1 is high, 2 is medium, and 3 is low; if the score is 1 or 2, an M&A component may be included in target price.

Asset mapping & comparison

Structured mapping from thesis to named assets (strengths, weaknesses, peers, risks).

  • Samsung Electronics
    Core coverage name; Korean memory champion; SEC
    Strengths
    US investors are relatively more inclined toward SEC for reasons including higher earnings leverage from broader conventional memory exposure, the HBM catch-up story, potential upside in HBM4 share, and nearer-term upside in shareholder return policy.
    Weaknesses
    Investors continue to monitor its supply strategy, as the company has relatively more clean room capacity than peers, and more aggressive capex could impact industry supply-demand balance.
    Comparison
    Relative to SK Hynix, some investors see SEC as having stronger conventional memory earnings leverage and more immediate shareholder return catalysts.
    Risks
    Main downside risks include a material deterioration in storage supply-demand, a sharp contraction in smartphone margins, loss of mobile OLED share, and potential capacity expansion.
  • SK Hynix Inc.
    Core coverage name; Korean memory champion; Hynix
    Strengths
    Investors preferring Hynix emphasize its higher beta, more attractive valuation given ROE relative to P/B, and potential valuation uplift from a potential ADR listing.
    Weaknesses
    Its HBM revenue and profits are more sensitive to AI capex, HBM demand, and Samsung’s progress in catching up in HBM.
    Comparison
    Relative to SEC, Hynix looks more like a high-beta and valuation-leverage name, but SEC was somewhat preferred in this round of US investor feedback.
    Risks
    Key risks include worsening storage supply-demand, delayed technology transitions, weakness in smartphone/PC/server demand, Samsung HBM progress exceeding expectations, and weakening AI-related capex.
  • Korean memory industry
    Industry theme; shared exposure to Samsung Electronics and SK Hynix
    Strengths
    DRAM and NAND still have upside potential in near-term pricing, HBM pricing in 2027 may gain support from strong conventional DRAM, and stronger LTAs could improve demand and earnings visibility.
    Weaknesses
    Price growth is broadly expected to slow from 2Q26 and further in 2H26, and margin levels near historical peaks are constraining the upside narrative.
    Comparison
    US investors are more divided on the storage industry than Asian investors, suggesting a higher proportion of downside views on Korean memory stock price potential in the US market.
    Risks
    Demand destruction, additional supply in 2028, China DRAM and NAND supply, macro conflicts, oil prices, interest rates, and uncertainty around LTA terms.

Key data

  • Number of investor interactions30+Goldman Sachs discussed Korean technology with over 30 US investors.
  • Samsung Electronics common stock target priceW285,000Based on a 12-month 2026E EV/EBITDA SOTP valuation.
  • Samsung Electronics preferred stock target priceW220,000Based on a 23% target discount to common stock.
  • SK Hynix target priceW1,350,000Based on the average 2026E/2027E P/B and applying a target P/B multiple of 2.9x.
  • Global rating distributionBuy 50%; Hold 34%; Sell 16%Goldman Sachs global equity coverage rating distribution disclosed in the appendix.
  • Investment banking coverage distributionBuy 65%; Hold 60%; Sell 45%Investment banking relationship distribution disclosed in the appendix.
  • LTA investor sentimentOverall negativeInvestors broadly believe LTAs often appear near the top of up-cycles in other industries, and customers in memory have exited LTAs historically.
  • 2027 conventional storage price outlookMostly flat to modestly upInvestor views on 2027 prices are mixed, but most still expect a flat-to-slightly-up trajectory.

Impact & implications

The report indicates Korean memory stocks have moved into a higher-disagreement phase: rising prices and strong profitability underpin the bull case, but investors are testing cycle durability, LTA enforceability, and supply discipline more rigorously. If upcoming earnings calls or investor materials confirm LTA terms with prepayments, co-investments, or price floors, and if HBM and conventional DRAM pricing remain strong, the valuation rerating case could strengthen. Conversely, if prices turn down toward late 2026 or early 2027, or demand is dragged by macro weakness and weaker end demand, Korean memory shares could come under pressure from a cycle-top narrative.

Risks

  • Material deterioration in storage supply-demand, especially if prices begin to decline month-over-month at the end of 2026 or early 2027.
  • DRAM and NAND price growth slowing from 2Q26 and further in 2H26, weakening the case for further upside in stock prices.
  • Margins are near historical peaks, with limited room for further expansion.
  • LTA may not be sufficiently enforceable, and customer exits could trigger a downside cycle.
  • Weakening demand for smartphones, PCs, and servers, which drags on conventional memory demand.
  • Supplier capex becoming materially more aggressive, with risk of oversupply from new 2028 supply additions.
  • Significant China DRAM and NAND supply could alter industry supply-demand expectations.
  • A decline in AI-related capex could pressure HBM demand and related revenue and profits.
  • Macro risks include Middle East conflict, elevated oil prices, and interest rate uncertainty.

What to watch

  • Whether upcoming earnings calls from Korean memory peers disclose detailed LTA terms.
  • Whether LTAs contain prepayments, co-investments, or price floors that can strengthen enforceability.
  • The extent to which DRAM and NAND price growth slows in 2H26, and whether 2027 pricing stays flat to modestly higher.
  • HBM4 ramp progress and SEC’s opportunity to gain share in HBM4.
  • Whether 2027 HBM pricing negotiations are supported by a strong conventional DRAM price backdrop.
  • Whether hyperscaler storage procurement activity remains robust.
  • Whether clean room constraints continue to limit additional wafer capacity over the next 12 to 18 months.
  • Whether incremental 2028 supply and China supply are sufficient to create excess risk in the industry.
  • Samsung Electronics and SK Hynix shareholder return policy, including dividends and buybacks.
  • Whether a potential ADR listing for SK Hynix delivers valuation upside.
Zhejiang ICP No. 2022035445-5
Disclaimer: Market data, charts, indicators, research views, and other information provided on this website are intended solely for information display, research communication, and educational reference. They should not be regarded as personalized investment advice, securities recommendations, trading instructions, solicitations, or guarantees of return. While we strive to improve the reliability of our data and content, such information may still be subject to delays, errors, incompleteness, or untimely updates due to source differences, methodological limitations, system processing, or market volatility. Users should exercise independent judgment based on their own circumstances and bear all risks and responsibilities arising from the use of this website.

Settings

Sign in to view recent logins