U.S. Tariff Impact Tracker: Imports May Pull Back Before Rebounding, but Trends Remain Highly Volatile
AI summary card
U.S. Tariff Impact Tracker: Imports May Pull Back Before Rebounding, but Trends Remain Highly Volatile
Goldman Sachs uses high-frequency data on vessel calls, TEU, ports, air freight, trucking, and inventories to track the impact of tariffs and trade uncertainty on U.S. imports and transportation stocks; current signals show weakening year-over-year cargo flows from China to the U.S. and rising volatility in planned TEU at the Port of Los Angeles over the next two weeks.
- Cargo vessels from China to the U.S. were down 2% week over week and 18% year over year last week, with the year-over-year decline widening from the prior week's 15%.
- Planned TEU at the Port of Los Angeles rose 12% week over week this week, but is expected to fall 4% next week and then rise 20% two weeks later; year-over-year trends are expected to turn negative over the next two weeks.
- Ocean container freight rates rose 2% week over week and were flat year over year, while West Coast trucking spot rates excluding fuel were up 18% year over year.
- Trade policy uncertainty, the policy path after Sec. 122 tariff expiration, geopolitical conflict, and energy costs are the key disruptors for future volumes and rates.
Report interpretation
Overview
This report is Goldman Sachs' U.S. Tariff Impact Tracker, focused on the effects of tariff policy and trade uncertainty on U.S. imports, global supply chains, and transportation stocks. The report argues that China-to-U.S. cargo flows remain weak in the near term, weekly data are noisy, and the timing mismatch around Lunar New Year, trade policy windows, shippers' front-loading, and geopolitical conflict all contribute to unstable import pacing and freight-rate trends.
Core views
The core views are: first, the year-over-year declines in cargo vessels and TEU from China to the U.S. have widened, indicating import demand has not yet stabilized; second, planned TEU at the Port of Los Angeles point to a short-term dip followed by a rebound, but year-over-year comparisons may turn negative; third, transport demand remains constrained by tariff uncertainty, but if rate cuts, U.S. manufacturing investment, reshoring/nearshoring, and supply chain restructuring emerge in 2026, transport volumes could enter a cyclical recovery; fourth, increases in air and ocean freight rates must be distinguished between those driven by real import demand and those driven by capacity constraints, surcharges, and fuel costs.
Analysis framework
The report cross-validates high-frequency weekly and selected monthly data, including the number of cargo vessels from China to the U.S., TEU, planned import volumes at the Port of Los Angeles, throughput at major Chinese ports, ocean container rates, WorldACD air cargo weight and rates, West Coast intermodal rail, truck load availability, truck spot rates, supply chain congestion indicators, monthly data for the three major West Coast ports, and inventory-related indicators.
Methodology notes
Observe the impact of tariffs on import and transport demand using weekly and monthly freight data
This framework combines vessel, TEU, port, air freight, trucking, rail, and inventory indicators to reduce noise in any single weekly data point and to identify trend changes caused by tariffs, Lunar New Year timing shifts, and shippers' front-loading.
Treat transport volume recovery as a key condition for earnings and valuation recovery
The report argues that whether transportation stocks have bottomed and entered an earnings revision cycle depends mainly on freight volume growth, especially higher-margin B2B, commercial, and manufacturing-related flows.
Estimate year-over-year changes in import value using year-over-year changes in TEU
Based on 2022 U.S. ocean trade and loaded TEU data for the top 25 ports, the report estimates value per TEU at roughly $52,000, adjusts it to about $57,000 for roughly 3% inflation, and then multiplies by TEU year-over-year changes to estimate monthly import value changes.
Asset mapping & comparison
Structured mapping from thesis to named assets (strengths, weaknesses, peers, risks).
- Transportation stocks overallAffected by tariffs, import demand, freight rates, and the transport volume cycle
- Strengths
- Could benefit in 2026 from rate cuts, manufacturing investment, reshoring/nearshoring, and supply chain restructuring.
- Weaknesses
- Current import data and weekly freight flows remain unstable, and the transport volume trough has not yet been fully confirmed.
- Comparison
- Compared with any single weekly data point, a cross-check of ocean freight, air freight, trucking, and port indicators better captures the trend.
- Risks
- Changes in tariff policy, geopolitical conflict, energy prices, and weakening consumer demand could all drag on volumes.
- Ocean containers and portsDirectly reflect export trends from China/Asia to the U.S. and import trends on the U.S. West Coast
- Strengths
- Planned TEU at the Port of Los Angeles provide a leading indicator, and rates are still rising on a week-over-week basis.
- Weaknesses
- Cargo vessels and TEU from China to the U.S. are both negative year over year, and the Port of Los Angeles is expected to turn negative year over year over the next two weeks.
- Comparison
- Vessel year-over-year trends from Mainland China are weaker than those from Asia ex-Mainland China, while TEU year-over-year trends are weak in both cases.
- Risks
- If the Red Sea or other lanes reopen and add effective capacity, rates may come under pressure; if demand is insufficient, the weekly rebound may not be sustainable.
- Air freightMay benefit from supply chain adjustments and demand for fast logistics
- Strengths
- Air cargo weight and rates from Asia Pacific to North America are still rising, and Asia Pacific to Europe is also showing higher weight and rates.
- Weaknesses
- The increase in rates may stem from fuel prices and capacity constraints rather than real demand improvement.
- Comparison
- Air freight is more sensitive than ocean shipping to geopolitical conflict and airport capacity shifts, with a stronger short-cycle logistics profile.
- Risks
- The estimate that about 15% of air capacity is affected remains dynamic; flight recoveries and fuel-price changes could quickly alter rates.
- TruckingReflects U.S. domestic freight flows and the inland transmission of West Coast imports
- Strengths
- West Coast truck spot rates excluding fuel are up 18% year over year, and load availability is up 41% year over year.
- Weaknesses
- Load availability fell 12% week over week, showing that near-term demand remains uneven.
- Comparison
- The report argues that trucking may benefit from lower recession odds and consumer resilience.
- Risks
- If demand air pockets emerge after import front-loading, freight demand in 2H25 or later could come under pressure.
- Express parcels UPS, FDXMay benefit from fast logistics, air freight, and global networks supporting supply chain shifts
- Strengths
- The report discloses that both UPS and FDX are Buy, and their global networks and fast-cycle logistics capabilities are advantages.
- Weaknesses
- These businesses are highly exposed to macro consumer demand and fuel costs.
- Comparison
- Compared with traditional ocean shipping, express parcels and air freight are better suited to supply chain switching and emergency replenishment.
- Risks
- If consumer demand weakens or enterprise inventory adjustments end, parcel volume growth may fall short of expectations.
- Freight forwarders EXPD, CHRWMay benefit from higher volatility and stronger customs brokerage demand
- Strengths
- Trade policy changes and supply chain restructuring may increase customer demand for forwarding and customs brokerage services.
- Weaknesses
- Negative year-over-year ocean freight rates would create revenue pressure and tougher comparisons.
- Comparison
- The report discloses CHRW as Neutral and EXPD as Sell.
- Risks
- If rates keep falling or the reopening of the Red Sea adds effective capacity, forwarding-related revenue may come under pressure.
Key data
- Cargo vessels from China to the U.S.-2% WoW, -18% YoYFor the week ended April 9, the year-over-year decline widened from -15% in the prior week.
- China to U.S. TEU-5% WoW, -13% YoYFor the week ended April 9, the prior week showed -8% YoY.
- Planned TEU at the Port of Los Angeles+12% WoW, then expected -4% WoW, then +20% WoW two weeks laterThe next two weeks are expected to average about -11% YoY, versus +6% this week.
- Throughput at major Chinese ports-3% WoW, +7% YoYFor the week ended March 31, compared with +4% WoW and +9% YoY in the prior week.
- Ocean freight rates from China/East Asia to the North America West Coast+2% WoW, flat YoYThe prior week rose 11% WoW, and the two-week average YoY rate is about +4%.
- Asia Pacific to North America air cargo weight and rates+7% and +12%WorldACD two-week-over-two-week data, as of March 29.
- West Coast intermodal rail-2% YoYA slight improvement from -3% YoY in the prior week.
- West Coast truck load availability-12% WoW, +41% YoYShows that truck supply-demand balance and load opportunities remain volatile.
- West Coast truck spot rates excluding fuel+3% WoW, +18% YoYBased on the latest weekly data from Truckstop.com.
- Supply chain congestion trackerHeld at 2, bottleneck index -4% WoWOverall fluidity remains close to the pre-pandemic baseline, but slightly above baseline.
- Monthly volume at the three major West Coast ports+1% YoY, -5% MoM from January to FebruaryThe three ports are LA, Long Beach, and Oakland; the month-over-month decline was better than the usual seasonal -8%.
- LMI inventory indicatorsUpstream inventory 58.2, downstream inventory 60.4, inventory cost 76.2March versus February data all showed expansion, with the inventory cost index rising from 67.8 to 76.2.
Impact & implications
For investors, tariff uncertainty may temporarily pressure shipper plans and cause repeated front-loading and destocking/restocking cycles, resulting in pronounced volatility in ocean freight, air freight, trucking, and port data. The medium-term opportunity for transportation stocks still depends on whether freight volumes truly recover; if rate cuts, manufacturing investment, reshoring/nearshoring, and China Plus 1/2 strategies generate more domestic and regional cargo flows, the sector could benefit, but if import demand weakens or higher energy costs weigh on consumer demand, the recovery pace may be delayed.
Risks
- The tariff policy path remains uncertain, and the arrangement after the 150-day expiration of Sec. 122 tariffs is still unclear.
- Weekly high-frequency data are highly volatile, and Lunar New Year timing shifts and shippers' front-loading may distort short-term trends.
- Geopolitical conflict may affect ocean and air freight rates through capacity constraints, surcharges, fuel, and energy costs.
- Higher rates do not necessarily mean real demand improvement; they may simply reflect cost or capacity disruptions.
- If rising energy costs weigh on U.S. consumer demand, overall freight demand could be hit more broadly.
- If the Red Sea or other lanes reopen and add effective capacity, ocean freight rates may face downward pressure.
What to watch
- Whether cargo vessels and TEU from China to the U.S. continue to worsen or stabilize over the next few weeks.
- Whether the decline next week and rebound two weeks later in planned TEU at the Port of Los Angeles can translate into sustained import demand.
- The U.S. policy path before and after Sec. 122 tariff expiration, and changes in enterprise ordering plans.
- The source of rising ocean and air freight rates: real demand, capacity constraints, fuel costs, or surcharges.
- Whether West Coast intermodal rail, truck load availability, and truck spot rates improve in tandem.
- Whether LMI inventory, inventory cost, and inventory-to-sales ratios show signs of restocking or destocking.
- Whether U.S. manufacturing investment, reshoring/nearshoring, and China Plus 1/2 strategies bring more domestic cargo flows.