Quick Summary
Covering the latest research from top Wall Street investment banks

Goldman Sachs rebalances 59 Asian strategy baskets, focusing on earnings momentum, capex and structural winners

Institution
Goldman Sachs
Date
2026-07-10
Authors
Alvin So, CFA, Timothy Moe, CFA, Kinger Lau, CFA, Bruce Kirk, CFA, Sunil Koul, John Kwon, Amorita Goel, CFA
Company
-
Ticker
-
Industry
Asian equity strategy; AI, aerospace and defense, financials, technology hardware and multi-theme baskets
Rating
-
NeutralLow confidenceFollowing the rebalancing of 59 Asian strategy baskets, the report favors GARP, global cyclicals, rate-sensitive financials, capital-intensive companies, earnings revision winners, AI infrastructure, aerospace and defense, power, and regional structural policy themes.
AuthorsAlvin So, CFA, Timothy Moe, CFA, Kinger Lau, CFA, Bruce Kirk, CFA, Sunil Koul, John Kwon, Amorita Goel, CFA
CoverageAsia-Pacific、Europe
Business segmentsMacro Slices、Geographic Exposure、Styles, Factors & Fundamentals、Investor Positioning、Thematic Baskets
Research firm divisions/subsidiariesGoldman Sachs(Other)

AI summary card

Goldman Sachs rebalances 59 Asian strategy baskets, focusing on earnings momentum, capex and structural winners

The report recommends capturing Asian equity opportunities in the second half of 2026 through GARP, global cyclicals, rate-sensitive financials, capital-intensive companies, earnings revision winners, AI infrastructure, power, aerospace and defense, and regional policy themes.

Not a single-company rating report; the core conclusion is to rebalance Asian strategy baskets and express selective preferences.
Asian strategyStrategy basketsGARPAI infrastructureCapexEarnings revisionsAerospace and defensePower and energy security
  • The report rebalances 59 Asian strategy baskets, which can be tracked in real time through Bloomberg and GS Marquee.
  • Against a backdrop of a hawkish Federal Reserve, potentially further rate hikes by Asian central banks, and weak local demand, the report favors GARP, global cyclicals and rate-sensitive financials, while relatively avoiding local cyclicals and consumption.
  • Capital-intensive companies benefit from tailwinds from geopolitics, energy security and strategic investment, while capital-light companies may face greater AI disruption risk.
  • The earnings revision factor is still viewed as a source of cross-cycle alpha. The report notes that Consensus Revision Winners vs. Losers have outperformed by 57 percentage points year to date, while Strong vs. Weak Earnings Revisions have led by 36 percentage points.
  • Key thematic areas include AI infrastructure, edge AI beneficiaries, power and nuclear energy, the space economy, defense spending, US reindustrialization, and structural policy themes in China, South Korea, Japan and India.

Report interpretation

Overview

This is a Goldman Sachs update on Asian strategy baskets. Its core approach is to track and trade Asian equities using macro slices, geographic revenue exposure, style factors, investor holdings and thematic baskets. The report covers the rebalancing of 59 strategy baskets and concentrates its second-half 2026 investment themes on earnings, the capex boom and structural winners.

Core views

The report's core views include: first, against a backdrop of hawkish interest rates and weak regional domestic demand, prioritize GARP, global cyclicals and rate-sensitive financials rather than local cyclicals or local consumption; second, capital-intensive companies are more likely to benefit from strategic investment, geopolitics and energy security, while capital-light companies may be pressured by AI disruption risk; third, earnings revision momentum remains effective, with a significant performance gap between earnings revision winners and losers; fourth, AI infrastructure, semiconductors, AIGC hardware, Taiwan Apple Suppliers, power, nuclear energy, the space economy and defense spending constitute important structural themes; fifth, China, South Korea, Japan and India correspond respectively to regional themes including AI, the five-year plan, shareholder returns, governance reform, economic security and self-sufficiency.

Analysis framework

The report expresses strategies through a multi-layer basket framework: macro slices divide the Asia ex-Japan market into global cyclicals, commodity cyclicals, local cyclicals, rate-sensitive financials, asset-sensitive financials and defensives; geographic revenue exposure baskets capture revenue sources from the US, Europe, China, international markets and local consumption; style and factor baskets track growth, value, GARP, momentum, earnings revisions, balance sheets, margins, dividends, capex and R&D; thematic baskets express opportunities in AI, power, defense, space, US reindustrialization and regional structural policies.

Methodology notes

  • Macro slicesAsia ex-Japan Macro Slices

    Dividing Asia ex-Japan equities into cyclical, financial and defensive portfolios based on macro drivers.

    The report divides cyclicals into global cyclicals, commodity cyclicals and local cyclicals, separates financials into rate-sensitive and asset-sensitive groups, and adds defensives to track equity performance across different macro cycles.

  • Style factorsGARP and Earnings Revision

    Capturing alpha through growth at a reasonable price and revisions to earnings expectations.

    The GARP basket selects stocks with both relatively high potential for sales and earnings growth and relatively low P/E and P/B valuations; the earnings revision basket compares stocks with upward and downward earnings revisions, and the report believes this dynamic factor can continue to contribute cross-cycle alpha.

  • Thematic investingAI Beneficiaries and Power Up Asia

    Building thematic exposure around AI computing demand, power supply and energy security.

    The report favors AI infrastructure, AIGC hardware, semiconductors and edge AI beneficiaries, as well as nuclear energy, renewable energy and electric utilities supported by computing demand and energy security.

Asset mapping & comparison

Structured mapping from thesis to named assets (strengths, weaknesses, peers, risks).

  • GSSZGARP
    Preferred basket
    Strengths
    Combines growth potential with relatively reasonable valuations, suitable for seeking earnings growth amid elevated interest rates and divergent demand.
    Weaknesses
    May underperform lower-valuation or defensive assets if growth expectations are revised downward or valuations come under renewed pressure.
    Comparison
    The report favors GARP, which is more attractive than local cyclicals and local consumption.
    Risks
    Falling earnings expectations, valuation compression and further weakness in Asian domestic demand.
  • GSSZMSGC
    Preferred basket
    Strengths
    Has greater global cyclical exposure and is more affected by improving activity in global and developed markets.
    Weaknesses
    Sensitive to external demand and the technology hardware and semiconductor cycles.
    Comparison
    The report favors global cyclicals over local cyclical GSSZMSDC and local consumption GSSZDOMC.
    Risks
    Slowing global growth, a stronger dollar and higher interest rates, and a downturn in the technology cycle.
  • GSSZMSFR
    Preferred basket
    Strengths
    Rate-sensitive financials such as banks and insurers may benefit from higher rates, capital market activity and wealth effects.
    Weaknesses
    Earnings sensitivity may suffer if credit risks rise or the yield curve becomes unfavorable.
    Comparison
    The report identifies rate-sensitive financials as a selective preferred financials direction.
    Risks
    A policy shift toward rate cuts, deteriorating asset quality and declining capital market activity.
  • GSSZHALO
    Preferred basket
    Strengths
    Capital-intensive companies have large asset bases and lower obsolescence risk, benefiting from strategic investment, geopolitics and energy security.
    Weaknesses
    Capex cycles are long, while asset turnover and returns may be affected by macroeconomic volatility.
    Comparison
    The report favors capital-intensive companies over capital-light GSSZLAHO.
    Risks
    Capex returns below expectations, reduced policy support and higher financing costs.
  • GSSZREVW / GSSZSERV
    Earnings momentum expression
    Strengths
    The earnings revision winners and strong earnings revision baskets have significantly outperformed their corresponding short baskets year to date.
    Weaknesses
    Momentum factors may reverse at an inflection point in earnings expectations or during a market style rotation.
    Comparison
    The report believes upward earnings revisions relative to downward revisions remain a source of cross-cycle alpha.
    Risks
    Overcrowded consensus expectations, slowing upward revisions and style rotation.
  • GSSZAIHW / GSSZAISM / GSSZAPPL
    AI beneficiary themes
    Strengths
    Supported by rising demand for AI servers, general-purpose servers, the memory cycle and agentic AI computing.
    Weaknesses
    Highly dependent on hardware upgrades, semiconductor supply and demand, and upgrades to end-market specifications.
    Comparison
    The report continues to favor AI infrastructure and edge AI beneficiaries.
    Risks
    A slowdown in AI capex, price declines caused by easing supply chain bottlenecks, and weaker-than-expected end-market demand.
  • GSSZNUCL / GSSZEVMT / GSSZPOWE
    Power and energy security themes
    Strengths
    Rising AI computing demand and energy security awareness support nuclear energy, renewable energy and electric utilities.
    Weaknesses
    Policy, subsidies and electricity pricing mechanisms have a significant impact on earnings.
    Comparison
    The report positions nuclear energy as a strategic direction, renewable energy as a tactical direction, and power and utilities as core holdings.
    Risks
    Policy execution below expectations, declining project returns and lower-than-expected growth in electricity demand.
  • GSSZADEF / GSSZDEFS / GSSZSPCE
    Defense and space themes
    Strengths
    Supported by geopolitical risks, defense budgets, order backlogs, policy support and structural demand.
    Weaknesses
    Thematic valuations and the pace of order fulfillment may be volatile.
    Comparison
    The report believes recent pullbacks in defense-related stocks may offer better entry points, while the space economy offers a relatively attractive risk-reward profile.
    Risks
    Delays in defense spending, order execution below expectations, and crowded or retreating thematic fund flows.

Key data

  • Number of rebalanced strategy baskets59The report says this update rebalances 59 strategy baskets, which can be tracked on Bloomberg and GS Marquee.
  • Number of style and factor baskets25The report says this update rebalances all 25 style & factor baskets.
  • Year-to-date relative performance of Consensus Revision Winners vs. Losers+57pp YTDThe report uses this data to demonstrate that earnings revision momentum remains a source of alpha.
  • Year-to-date relative performance of Strong vs. Weak Earnings Revisions+36pp YTDThe report uses this data to support the performance advantage of the strong earnings revision basket over the weak earnings revision basket.
  • Geographic revenue exposure baskets6These cover revenue sources including the US, Europe, China, international markets and local consumption.
  • Constituents of an individual macro slice basket40 large-cap stocks, with a 10% single-stock capMacro slice baskets consist of large-cap stocks in the MXASJ Index and are classified by GICS sector.
  • Liquidity threshold for geographic exposure basketsFree-float market capitalization > US$1bn, 6-month ADVT > US$5mnThe report states that geographic exposure baskets are ranked by the latest revenue exposure, subject to market capitalization and trading volume constraints.

Impact & implications

For investors, the report provides a set of tradable and trackable Asian equity strategy expressions rather than a single-stock recommendation. The implication is that, in an environment of elevated interest rates, weak domestic demand, rising AI computing and energy security needs, and stronger geopolitical and industrial policies, portfolio allocations can tilt toward global demand, reasonably valued growth, earnings revision winners, capital-intensive companies, AI infrastructure, power, aerospace and defense, and selected regional policy beneficiaries.

Risks

  • Past performance and historical backtests are not indicative of future results.
  • The tradability of baskets depends on market conditions, including liquidity and stock-borrow constraints.
  • The rebalancing results reflected on Bloomberg and GS Marquee may be subject to delays after publication.
  • A hawkish interest-rate environment, weak Asian domestic demand, and fluctuations in the dollar and interest rates may affect the performance of cyclical and growth baskets.
  • If AI capex, server demand, the memory cycle or end-market specification upgrades fall short of expectations, related baskets may come under pressure.
  • Geopolitical, energy security and defense spending themes face risks related to policy timing and order fulfillment.

What to watch

  • The policy paths of the Federal Reserve and Asian central banks, and the impact of rising rates or policy shifts on GARP, financials and long-duration assets.
  • Changes in global growth, US demand and Asian export supply chains.
  • Progress in AI servers, general-purpose servers, the memory cycle, semiconductor supply and demand, and specification upgrades among Taiwan Apple Suppliers.
  • Electricity demand, nuclear energy policy, renewable energy policy and implementation of China's anti-involution policy.
  • The space economy, defense budgets, order backlogs and re-rating opportunities.
  • China's 15th FYP, shareholder returns, overseas expansion, IPO alpha and operating tailwinds for growth stocks.
  • South Korea's governance reform and value-up policies, Japan's economic security and cross-shareholding reform, and India's energy security and defense self-sufficiency themes.
Zhejiang ICP No. 2022035445-5
Disclaimer: Market data, charts, indicators, research views, and other information provided on this website are intended solely for information display, research communication, and educational reference. They should not be regarded as personalized investment advice, securities recommendations, trading instructions, solicitations, or guarantees of return. While we strive to improve the reliability of our data and content, such information may still be subject to delays, errors, incompleteness, or untimely updates due to source differences, methodological limitations, system processing, or market volatility. Users should exercise independent judgment based on their own circumstances and bear all risks and responsibilities arising from the use of this website.

Settings

Sign in to view recent logins