Quick Summary
Covering the latest research from top Wall Street investment banks

TSMC and ASE accelerate CoWoS capacity expansion; UBS raises cloud AI advanced packaging TAM expectations

Institution
UBS
Date
2026-07-01
Authors
Sunny Lin, Randy Abrams, Nicolas Gaudois, Timothy Arcuri, Jerry Su, Shingo Hirata, CFA, Ryan Sun, Christine Chen, Diana Chang, Jimmy Yoon
Company
TSMC, ASE, GPTC, MediaTek and related cloud AI semiconductor supply-chain companies
Ticker
2330.TW; 3711.TW; 3131.TWO; 2454.TW
Industry
Semiconductors; Semiconductor Equipment
Rating
Buy: TSMC, MediaTek, ASE, GPTC and selected advanced-packaging equipment names
BullishLow confidenceThe report believes that the CoWoS capacity expansion pace of TSMC and ASE is faster than previously expected, reflecting stronger cloud AI demand and driving a larger TAM for advanced packaging, back-end testing, and related equipment supply chains.
AuthorsSunny Lin, Randy Abrams, Nicolas Gaudois, Timothy Arcuri, Jerry Su, Shingo Hirata, CFA, Ryan Sun, Christine Chen, Diana Chang, Jimmy Yoon
Target priceTSMC NT$3,400; ASE NT$835; GPTC NT$5,000; MediaTek NT$6,500
CoverageOther
Business segmentsCloud AI semiconductors、Advanced packaging、CoWoS、Back-end packaging and testing、Server CPU、GPU、ASIC、Semiconductor wet process equipment
Research firm divisions/subsidiariesUBS(Other)

AI summary card

TSMC and ASE accelerate CoWoS capacity expansion; UBS raises cloud AI advanced packaging TAM expectations

UBS believes CoWoS capacity in 2026-2027 will expand faster than expected a month ago, reflecting stronger underlying cloud AI demand and continuing to benefit companies in advanced packaging and equipment chains such as TSMC, ASE, MediaTek, and GPTC.

Overall view is positive; key recommendations are TSMC, MediaTek, and ASE, while also favoring advanced packaging and testing equipment suppliers such as GPTC, Chroma, Hon Precision, and ASMPT.
SemiconductorsCloud AICoWoSAdvanced packagingTSMCASEGPTCServer CPUASIC
  • UBS raised its TSMC CoWoS capacity forecast to 130kwpm by end-2026 and 180kwpm by end-2027, versus previous forecasts of 120kwpm and 150kwpm, respectively.
  • ASE's full-process CoWoS capacity is expected to grow from above 20kwpm by end-2026 to about 50kwpm by end-2027, increasing OSAT's role in advanced packaging.
  • Industry CoWoS capacity is expected to rise from 160kwpm by end-2026 to 250kwpm by end-2027, indicating that advanced packaging TAM could expand significantly.
  • Demand is driven by Nvidia, AMD, Google TPU, Amazon Trainium, and others; AMD's 2027 CoWoS demand is expected to grow 232%, while Nvidia's CoWoS demand is expected to grow 57%.
  • UBS raised ASE's target price to NT$835 and GPTC's target price to NT$5,000, and believes opportunities in CoWoS, SolC, HBM, and CPO are not yet fully reflected in share prices.

Report interpretation

Overview

This report focuses on advanced packaging capacity expansion driven by cloud AI. Its core view is that the CoWoS expansion pace of TSMC and ASE is re-accelerating and is stronger than UBS expected a month ago. UBS views CoWoS capacity as a leading indicator of cloud AI demand over the next 2-3 years, and believes the upward revision to 2026-2027 expansion implies further upside for server CPU, GPU, and ASIC demand.

Core views

The report's core views include: first, TSMC will remain the largest participant in advanced packaging, with technology upgrades such as CoWoS, CoPoS, 3D stacking, and CPO supporting continued growth in its back-end business; second, opportunities for OSATs such as ASE will increase from 2H26 to 2027, especially driven by server CPU demand; third, platforms such as Nvidia Rubin, Vera CPU, AMD Venice, MI450/455, Google TPU, and Amazon Trainium will collectively drive higher CoWoS demand; fourth, equipment-chain names including GPTC, Chroma, Hon Precision, ASMPT, and testing-chain player KYEC are expected to benefit.

Analysis framework

UBS derives its investment conclusions through advanced packaging supply-demand models, shipment forecasts for major customer chips, a split between TSMC and non-TSMC capacity, back-end sales contribution, equipment shipment volume, and valuation multiple frameworks. The report also compares the contributions of GPU and ASIC customers to CoWoS wafer demand, and uses cloud capex, N3/N2 expansion, and HBM-related capex as validation signals for demand strength.

Methodology notes

  • Capacity supply-demand trackingCoWoS capacity and demand balance

    Using CoWoS capacity expansion as a leading indicator of cloud AI demand

    The report compares CoWoS capacity expansion at TSMC, ASE, and other OSATs with chip shipment demand from customers such as Nvidia, AMD, Google, Amazon, and Meta to assess the advanced packaging cycle over the next 2-3 years.

  • Supply chain breakdownGPU and ASIC demand structure analysis

    Breaking down CoWoS wafer demand by customer and chip type

    The report separately estimates CoWoS demand from Nvidia, AMD, Google TPU, Amazon Trainium, Meta, and other ASIC customers, showing that GPUs remain the main source of demand in 2027, while ASICs also maintain an important contribution.

  • Valuation methodP/E valuation method

    Deriving target prices from earnings upgrades and target P/E multiples

    GPTC's target price was raised to NT$5,000, based on 33x 2027-2028E P/E; UBS believes a 36% long-term earnings CAGR can support this valuation multiple.

Asset mapping & comparison

Structured mapping from thesis to named assets (strengths, weaknesses, peers, risks).

  • TSMC / 2330.TW
    Core beneficiary of cloud AI advanced packaging and the largest CoWoS capacity provider
    Strengths
    Leading market share, continued upward revisions to CoWoS capacity, higher back-end sales contribution, and benefits from technology upgrades such as 3D stacking, CoPoS, and CPO.
    Weaknesses
    Advanced packaging requires high investment intensity, and the subsequent expansion pace still needs to match actual customer demand.
    Comparison
    Even if supply becomes more diversified in 2027-2028, the report still believes TSMC will remain the largest participant.
    Risks
    Slower-than-expected CoWoS expansion, weaker-than-expected cloud AI demand, technology substitution, and geopolitical uncertainty.
  • ASE / 3711.TW
    Beneficiary of CoWoS expansion and full-process advanced packaging on the OSAT side
    Strengths
    Full-process CoWoS capacity in 2027 is expected to reach about 50kwpm, driven by AMD Venice and server CPU demand.
    Weaknesses
    Compared with TSMC, it still operates in a more fragmented OSAT competitive landscape, and capacity utilization depends on the pace of customer ramp-up.
    Comparison
    The report expects OSAT advanced packaging capacity to increase in 2027, with ASE being more representative than other OSATs.
    Risks
    Weaker-than-expected server CPU demand, slower-than-expected customer order transfer, and technology and yield ramp risks.
  • GPTC / 3131.TWO
    Advanced packaging wet process equipment supplier, benefiting from TSMC and OSAT capacity expansion
    Strengths
    High share among OSAT customers, strong technical capabilities, historically maintaining gross margin above 40%, and the report expects gross margin to gradually recover to about 45% in 2027-2028.
    Weaknesses
    Gross margin faces some pressure in 2025-2026 due to outsourcing part of module assembly to meet demand.
    Comparison
    The report believes GPTC has technological leadership and product iteration advantages over competitors, with the target price raised from NT$4,000 to NT$5,000.
    Risks
    Slower-than-expected CoWoS expansion, competitor technology breakthroughs, geopolitical uncertainty, and weaker-than-expected AI growth.
  • MediaTek / 2454.TW
    Beneficiary of Google TPU design services and ASIC demand growth
    Strengths
    Expected to support 4 million units of TPU v8t capacity and listed as one of UBS's top picks in the cloud AI semiconductor supply chain.
    Weaknesses
    Growth depends on Google TPU project progress and ASIC customer demand.
    Comparison
    Compared with the traditional GPU chain, MediaTek represents upside opportunities in the ASIC design service segment.
    Risks
    Customer project delays, weaker-than-expected ASIC demand, and intensifying competition.
  • Chroma, Hon Precision, ASMPT, KYEC, Aspeed, GUC, Alchip
    Extended beneficiary assets across advanced packaging, testing, BMC, CPU, and Trainium-related supply chains
    Strengths
    They benefit respectively from advanced packaging test equipment, final testing, BMC, potential upside in Google CPU, and Amazon Trainium opportunities.
    Weaknesses
    Each company has a more diversified benefit path and is sensitive to specific customer projects, capex, and order timing.
    Comparison
    These companies are supply-chain beta names beyond TSMC, ASE, MediaTek, and GPTC.
    Risks
    Customer order volatility, valuations already overly reflecting expectations, and slowing AI hardware demand or capex.

Key data

  • TSMC CoWoS capacity forecast130kwpm by end-2026, 180kwpm by end-2027Previous forecasts were 120kwpm and 150kwpm, respectively.
  • ASE full-process CoWoS capacity forecastAbove 20kwpm by end-2026, about 50kwpm by end-2027The previous end-2027 forecast was 40kwpm.
  • Industry CoWoS capacity forecast160kwpm by end-2026, 250kwpm by end-2027Reflects UBS's view of expanding advanced packaging TAM.
  • AMD CoWoS demand2027E growth 232%Mainly driven by volume ramp-up of Venice server CPU and MI450/455; Venice 2027 shipments are estimated at 4 million units.
  • Nvidia CoWoS demand2027E growth 57%Vera CPU 2027 shipments are estimated at 5.5 million units, and Rubin GPU is expected to accelerate significantly in 2H26.
  • Google TPU chipset shipments4.1 million units in 2026, 9 million units in 2027MediaTek is expected to support 4 million units of TPU v8t capacity.
  • TSMC back-end business as a percentage of salesAbout 12.1% in 2026E, about 15.3% in 2027EIncludes advanced packaging, bumping, and testing.
  • GPTC tool shipmentsAbout 220 units in 2026, about 330 units in 2027The report expects tool shipments to grow 22% and 50% in 2026 and 2027, respectively.
  • GPTC target priceNT$5,000Raised from NT$4,000, based on 33x 2027-2028E P/E.
  • ASE target priceNT$835Raised from NT$660.

Impact & implications

If UBS's view materializes, the cloud AI advanced packaging investment theme will extend from TSMC's standalone expansion to a broader supply chain including OSATs, equipment, testing, and design services. TSMC still holds the largest market share and advantages from technology upgrades, while ASE and Amkor may gain more opportunities from 2H26 to 2027, and equipment makers such as GPTC may benefit from OSAT expansion and demand from new technologies such as SolC, panel-level packaging, and CPO.

Risks

  • CoWoS capacity expansion is slower than expected.
  • Competitors achieve breakthroughs in advanced packaging or related equipment technologies.
  • Geopolitical uncertainty affects the supply chain, customer orders, or capital expenditures.
  • Cloud AI growth is weaker than expected, leading to lower-than-forecast demand for GPUs, server CPUs, or ASICs.
  • Key platforms such as Rubin, Venice, TPU, and Trainium experience ramp delays.
  • Equipment makers face greater-than-expected gross margin pressure due to outsourcing, capacity expansion, or competition.

What to watch

  • Whether TSMC's 2026-2027 CoWoS capacity progresses along the 130kwpm and 180kwpm path.
  • Whether ASE's full-process CoWoS capacity can rise to about 50kwpm in 2027.
  • The volume ramp slope of Nvidia Rubin and Vera CPU from 2H26 to 2027.
  • Whether AMD Venice and MI450/455 shipment delivery materializes in 2027.
  • Changes in customer orders for Google TPU v8t, TPU v9, and Amazon Trainium 3/4.
  • Whether TSMC's back-end business sales contribution increases further from about 12% in 2026 to about 15% in 2027.
  • Whether GPTC's tool shipments, gross margin recovery, and support for the 33x P/E valuation materialize.
  • The substitution or complementary impact after 2028 of Intel EMIB-T, TSMC CoPoS, and other advanced packaging solutions.
Zhejiang ICP No. 2022035445-5
Disclaimer: Market data, charts, indicators, research views, and other information provided on this website are intended solely for information display, research communication, and educational reference. They should not be regarded as personalized investment advice, securities recommendations, trading instructions, solicitations, or guarantees of return. While we strive to improve the reliability of our data and content, such information may still be subject to delays, errors, incompleteness, or untimely updates due to source differences, methodological limitations, system processing, or market volatility. Users should exercise independent judgment based on their own circumstances and bear all risks and responsibilities arising from the use of this website.

Settings

Sign in to view recent logins