Quick Summary
Covering the latest research from top Wall Street investment banks

Rising energy and fading momentum compress cross-asset diversification; neutral short term, modestly pro-risk over 12 months

Institution
Goldman Sachs
Date
2026-07-21
Authors
Andrea Ferrario, Christian Mueller-Glissmann, CFA, Alessandro Giglio, Giovanni Ferrannini, Elena Porfidia, Peter Oppenheimer
Company
-
Ticker
-
Industry
Cross-asset macro, energy and resources
Rating
-
NeutralLow confidenceThe report says it maintains a tactical neutral stance in the short term, as bullish positioning, rising energy prices, and macro headwinds weigh on risk-adjusted returns; however, it is modestly pro-risk over a 12-month horizon, believing that earnings growth in the second half can still support equities.
AuthorsAndrea Ferrario, Christian Mueller-Glissmann, CFA, Alessandro Giglio, Giovanni Ferrannini, Elena Porfidia, Peter Oppenheimer
CoverageUnited States、Emerging Markets、Europe、Other
Asset classesFixed Income、FX、Money Market、Derivatives
Business segmentscross_asset、equity、government_bonds、commodities、fx、credit
Research firm divisions/subsidiariesGoldman Sachs(Other)、Goldman Sachs International(Other)

AI summary card

Rising energy and fading momentum compress cross-asset diversification; neutral short term, modestly pro-risk over 12 months

Goldman Sachs GOAL notes that Middle East developments continue to push oil and gas prices higher, AI-related equity momentum continues to pull back, macro assets are more driven by front-end rates, and traditional cross-asset diversification has become less effective.

Tactical neutral over 3 months; modestly pro-risk over 12 months, with overweight equities, neutral cash/bonds/commodities, and underweight credit.
Macro researchCross-asset allocationEnergy pricesEquity momentumDefensive and quality stylesOptions hedging
  • Oil, gasoline, and natural gas prices continued to rise, with some energy products less than 10% below their highs for the year.
  • S&P 500 Momentum underperformed the broader market by about 5% again over one week, as momentum trades related to AI capex continued to unwind.
  • Equities are more affected by the momentum factor, while macro assets such as bonds, FX, and gold are more correlated with front-end rates; average cross-regional and cross-asset correlations have risen since the start of the month.
  • The report continues to favor defensive, quality, and real-asset equities such as Low Vol, Dividend Aristocrats, REITs, and Infrastructure to balance portfolios with heavier innovation exposure.
  • In asset allocation, it maintains tactical neutrality over 3 months and is modestly pro-risk over 12 months: overweight equities, neutral cash, bonds, and commodities, and underweight credit.

Report interpretation

Overview

This report is Goldman Sachs GOAL's weekly cross-asset research, focusing on how further increases in energy prices and the unwinding of equity momentum affect global asset performance, correlations, risk appetite, and portfolio allocation. The report argues that since July, markets have been driven by two main themes: first, changes in policy and inflation pricing stemming from energy prices; second, the pullback in momentum trades tied to AI capital spending. The effects of these two themes are uneven across assets: equities are mainly driven by momentum, while macro assets are more driven by rates and policy expectations.

Core views

The core view of the report is that short-term macro headwinds and long positioning may weigh on risk-adjusted returns, so it stays tactically neutral over a 3-month horizon; however, it remains modestly pro-risk over a 12-month horizon, mainly relying on earnings growth in the second half of the year to support equities. As correlations rise across assets and regions, traditional diversification opportunities are diminishing; more effective diversification comes from defensive/quality styles and real-asset equities amid high dispersion within equities. For protection against growth shocks, put options on the Russell 2000, US Consumer Discretionary, US Banks, China equity, and the S&P 500 are attractive because their implied volatility remains relatively low compared with some single stocks, the Nasdaq, or EM equity volatility.

Analysis framework

The report evaluates macro shocks, momentum pullbacks, and asset allocation implications through frameworks including cross-asset returns, front-end rates, equity momentum, risk appetite indicators, correlation matrices, valuation and risk premia, fund flows, CFTC positioning, implied/realized volatility, market-implied recession probability, and equity drawdown probability models.

Methodology notes

  • cross_asset_regressionmonth-to-date multivariate regression

    Cross-asset driver decomposition

    Using month-to-date multivariate regression, the report compares the impact of momentum and front-end rates on different assets, showing that equities are more influenced by momentum, while macro assets such as bonds, FX, and gold are more correlated with front-end rates.

  • risk_appetiteGS Risk Appetite Indicator and PCA

    Risk appetite and principal component analysis

    The report cites risk appetite indicators and principal component analysis to decompose market performance into factors such as global growth, monetary policy, and the US dollar, in order to observe the transmission of macro risks.

  • portfolio_construction60/40, risk parity and dynamic allocation strategies

    Balanced portfolio and dynamic allocation assessment

    The report compares 60/40, risk parity, volatility-targeting, and momentum-overlay strategies to assess portfolio resilience in an environment of rising correlations.

  • options_hedging3-month 25-delta implied volatility

    Attractiveness of put option hedging

    The report compares 3-month 25-delta implied volatility and believes that put options on some equity indices and sectors are relatively cheap and can be used to hedge growth shocks.

  • macro_probability_modelmarket-implied US recession and S&P 500 drawdown probability models

    Market-implied recession and drawdown probability

    The report uses market indicators and multivariate logit models to track US recession probability, the probability of a sharp S&P 500 drawdown, and upside probability, and uses Shapley values to explain the sources of contribution.

Asset mapping & comparison

Structured mapping from thesis to named assets (strengths, weaknesses, peers, risks).

  • Equities
    Modestly positive over 12 months, but constrained in the short term by fading momentum and macro headwinds
    Strengths
    Earnings growth may support performance in the second half, and high dispersion within equities provides opportunities for style and sector selection.
    Weaknesses
    Momentum trades related to AI capital spending are pulling back, and short-term long positioning may weigh on risk-adjusted returns.
    Comparison
    Compared with bonds, FX, and gold, equities are less correlated with front-end rates and more sensitive to momentum.
    Risks
    Rising macro risks may lead to greater downside risk for equities.
  • Low Vol、Dividend Aristocrats、REITs、Infrastructure
    Viewed by the report as better sources of portfolio diversification
    Strengths
    Since July, defensive/quality styles and real-asset equities have delivered positive returns and can balance portfolios with heavier innovation exposure.
    Weaknesses
    If risk appetite shifts back toward high-momentum growth stocks, defensive styles may lag relatively.
    Comparison
    When traditional cross-asset diversification declines, style diversification within equities becomes more valuable.
    Risks
    Higher rates or macro shocks may still weigh on REIT and Infrastructure valuations.
  • Commodities and Energy
    Rising energy prices are an important driver of macro pricing and inflation expectations
    Strengths
    The Energy sector has performed strongly recently, carries a high weight in the S&P GSCI, and contributes significantly to the index.
    Weaknesses
    With prices near yearly highs, it is more sensitive to geopolitics and demand expectations.
    Comparison
    Energy has a stronger influence on policy pricing and inflation expectations than most other commodity sectors.
    Risks
    If Middle East tensions ease or a growth shock weakens demand, energy prices may fall back.
  • Government bonds
    In the short term, affected by policy expectations and inflation pricing
    Strengths
    They may still provide defensive characteristics in a growth shock.
    Weaknesses
    Rising energy prices and changes in inflation pricing may push yields higher and weigh on bond returns.
    Comparison
    The report points out that macro assets such as bonds are more correlated with front-end rates.
    Risks
    Hawkish central bank rhetoric or inflation repricing may lead to higher rate volatility.
  • Gold
    As a macro asset, it is more correlated with front-end rates
    Strengths
    It can provide some safe-haven function amid macro uncertainty.
    Weaknesses
    The table shows negative returns for precious metals over both 1 week and 1 month recently.
    Comparison
    Unlike equities, gold is closer to a rate-driven asset in the report's framework.
    Risks
    Higher real rates or a stronger US dollar may weigh on gold.
  • Credit
    Underweight in the 12-month allocation
    Strengths
    Credit can still provide coupon income.
    Weaknesses
    The report underweights credit in its 12-month asset allocation, implying less attractive relative risk-reward than equities.
    Comparison
    The report monitors credit attractiveness through relative valuation between equities and credit, and the correlation between CDS and equity volatility.
    Risks
    Growth shocks, higher financing costs, or weaker risk appetite may widen credit spreads.
  • Equity puts
    Tools for hedging growth shocks
    Strengths
    The report finds put options on the Russell 2000, US Consumer Discretionary, US Banks, China equity, and the S&P 500 attractive because their implied volatility remains relatively low.
    Weaknesses
    If markets continue to rise or volatility declines, option buyers may lose the premium.
    Comparison
    Compared with volatility on single stocks, the Nasdaq, or EM equity, these put options are more attractively priced.
    Risks
    Option strategies involve premium loss risk and risks related to strike and maturity selection.

Key data

  • Energy pricesGasoline and natural gas prices are less than 10% below their highs for the yearThe report says renewed escalation in the Middle East has continued to push oil prices higher, with even larger gains in energy product prices.
  • Equity momentumS&P 500 Momentum underperformed the market by about 5% again on a weekly basisThe continued unwinding of momentum/AI-related trades is an important driver of equity performance this month.
  • Asset allocation viewNeutral over 3 months; modestly pro-risk over 12 monthsThe 12-month allocation is overweight equities, neutral cash, bonds, and commodities, and underweight credit.
  • Diversification statusAverage pairwise two-week correlations across regions and assets have risen since the start of the monthThe report believes traditional diversification opportunities are becoming limited.
  • Commodity sector performanceS&P GSCI: 6.8% over 1 week, 5.8% over 1 month, 40.4% over 1 year; Energy: 13.8% over 1 week, 13.3% over 1 month, 66.2% over 1 yearThe table shows that Energy has a 54.4% weight in the S&P GSCI and is the main contributor to recent commodity performance.
  • Precious metals performancePrecious Metals: -2.7% over 1 week, -9.5% over 1 month, 21.2% over 1 yearAlthough the report classifies gold as a macro asset linked to front-end rates, precious metals in the table have shown weak recent returns.

Impact & implications

For portfolios, higher energy prices and shifting policy expectations may continue to limit the short-term risk-adjusted returns of risk assets; high dispersion within equities means that sector, style, and quality selection matter more than simple cross-asset allocation. The report leans toward using defensive/quality styles and real-asset equities to improve the balance of portfolios with heavier innovation exposure, while also using relatively cheap equity put options to hedge growth shocks.

Risks

  • Further increases in energy prices may push up inflation expectations and affect central bank policy pricing.
  • Continued unwinding of equity momentum and AI-related trades may weigh on the performance of major equity indices.
  • Rising cross-asset and cross-regional correlations will weaken the effectiveness of traditional diversification.
  • Long positioning and macro headwinds may reduce short-term risk-adjusted returns.
  • Rising macro risks may trigger larger equity downside risk or growth shocks.
  • Options and ETF-related strategies carry risks including premium loss, liquidity, discount/premium, and execution risk.

What to watch

  • Whether Middle East developments and prices of oil, gasoline, and natural gas continue to approach or break yearly highs.
  • Changes in US and European 2-year inflation pricing and central bank rhetoric.
  • The relative performance of S&P 500 Momentum and AI capital spending-related stocks.
  • Whether pairwise correlations across assets and regions continue to rise.
  • The relative performance of defensive/quality and real-asset equities such as Low Vol, Dividend Aristocrats, REITs, and Infrastructure.
  • Implied volatility of put options on the Russell 2000, US Consumer Discretionary, US Banks, China equity, and the S&P 500.
  • Market-implied US recession probability, S&P 500 drawdown probability, fund flows, and CFTC positioning.
Zhejiang ICP No. 2022035445-5
Disclaimer: Market data, charts, indicators, research views, and other information provided on this website are intended solely for information display, research communication, and educational reference. They should not be regarded as personalized investment advice, securities recommendations, trading instructions, solicitations, or guarantees of return. While we strive to improve the reliability of our data and content, such information may still be subject to delays, errors, incompleteness, or untimely updates due to source differences, methodological limitations, system processing, or market volatility. Users should exercise independent judgment based on their own circumstances and bear all risks and responsibilities arising from the use of this website.

Settings

Sign in to view recent logins