Quick Summary
Covering the latest research from top Wall Street investment banks

J.P. Morgan reviews Japanese semiconductor equipment and technical materials valuation, capex, and supply-chain opportunities

Institution
J.P. Morgan
Date
2026-06-22
Authors
Mio Shikanai AC
Company
-
Ticker
-
Industry
Semiconductors; Information Technology Services
Rating
Multiple-company coverage: Overweight, Neutral and Underweight
NeutralLow confidenceCoverage list shows many Overweight recommendations across Japanese semiconductor equipment and technical materials, while several names remain Neutral or Underweight.
AuthorsMio Shikanai AC
CoverageAsia-Pacific、Other
Asset classesEquity
Business segmentsSemiconductor equipment、Technical materials、DRAM、NAND Flash、CoWoS and AI servers、Glass materials、Cement and industrial materials
Research firm divisions/subsidiariesJ.P. Morgan(Other)、JPMorgan Securities Japan Co., Ltd.(Other)

AI summary card

J.P. Morgan reviews Japanese semiconductor equipment and technical materials valuation, capex, and supply-chain opportunities

The report centers on valuation tables, industry demand assumptions, CoWoS/AI servers, DRAM, NAND, SPE orders, and charts on Japanese materials companies, showing how investment opportunities diverge across the semiconductor upcycle between equipment and materials.

The overall view is relatively positive but not fully bullish: Tokyo Electron (8035), Advantest (6857), SCREEN Holdings (7735), HOYA (7741), and KIOXIA Holdings (285A) are OW; Disco (6146), Lasertec (6920), AGC (5201), Kaneka (4118), and Nippon Sheet Glass (5202) are N; Nikon (7731) is shown as UW in the disclosure table.
SemiconductorsJapanese technology stocksSemiconductor equipmentTechnical materialsAI serversCoWoSDRAMNAND
  • The report covers multiple Japanese semiconductor-related companies, with Overweight names including Tokyo Electron, Advantest, SCREEN Holdings, HOYA, KIOXIA Holdings, JX Advanced Metals, Nittobo, Rigaku Holdings, and ULVAC.
  • Core industry variables include CSP capex, AI server shipments, TSMC and non-TSMC CoWoS capacity expansion, ASML stepper sales, DRAM/NAND supply-demand, and SPE order trends.
  • The technical materials section focuses on price, capacity, and profitability trends for glass, mask blanks, sputtering targets, semiconductor support glass, and cement and other industrial materials.
  • The valuation tables show that some growth-oriented semiconductor equipment companies trade at elevated valuations, so the investment conclusion must be judged in conjunction with order visibility, the durability of AI demand, and the timing of earnings realization.

Report interpretation

Overview

This is a J.P. Morgan industry research and valuation package on the semiconductor and technical materials segments within technology. Centered on the Japanese listed coverage universe, the report compares equipment, materials, glass, testing, wafer processing, and industrial materials companies against global semiconductor demand, SPE equipment sales, memory supply-demand, AI servers, and CoWoS capacity expansion.

Core views

The underlying thesis is that the semiconductor cycle and AI-related capital spending continue to drive earnings elasticity for Japanese equipment and materials companies. Within the equipment chain, Tokyo Electron, Advantest, and SCREEN Holdings benefit from SPE demand, testing demand, and advanced-node investment; within the materials chain, JX Advanced Metals, Nittobo, HOYA, and Rigaku Holdings benefit from demand for high-end materials, inspection, and critical consumables. At the same time, several stocks remain Neutral or Underweight because of valuation, order volatility, or limited earnings leverage.

Analysis framework

The report combines a top-down industry view with horizontal company comparison: it first tracks industry variables such as semiconductor shipments, CSP capex, AI servers, CoWoS, DRAM, NAND, and SPE orders, then compares the covered companies on valuation, revenue growth, EPS growth, PER, EV/EBITDA, PBR, ROE, dividend yield, FCF yield, and operating margin.

Methodology notes

  • Valuation comparisonPeer valuation table

    Compares covered companies on share price, target price, market cap, sales and EPS CAGR, PER, EV/EBITDA, PBR, ROE, FCF yield, and operating margin.

    This framework is suitable for assessing whether the growth profile, earnings quality, and valuation of different semiconductor equipment and materials companies are aligned.

  • Industry cycle analysisSemiconductor supply-demand and capex tracking

    Tracks CSP capex, AI server shipments, CoWoS capacity, DRAM/NAND supply-demand, ASML sales, and SPE orders.

    These variables determine equipment orders, materials demand, and the timing of earnings realization for related companies.

  • Supply-chain mappingSemiconductor supply chain and technology roadmap

    Places foundries, memory, equipment, materials, glass, and testing companies within the semiconductor supply chain for comparison.

    This helps identify which companies are closer to AI, advanced packaging, advanced nodes, and high-end materials demand.

Asset mapping & comparison

Structured mapping from thesis to named assets (strengths, weaknesses, peers, risks).

  • Tokyo Electron (8035)
    Semiconductor equipment leader, affected by SPE new equipment sales, advanced-node investment, and foundry capex.
    Strengths
    Coverage rating is OW, and the business is highly correlated with SPE demand, major customer capex, and semiconductor technology-node upgrades.
    Weaknesses
    Valuation is relatively high, making it sensitive to order realization and cycle durability.
    Comparison
    Along with Advantest and SCREEN Holdings, it is one of Japan's core semiconductor equipment names, but it sits in a different part of the value chain.
    Risks
    A downward revision in foundry capex, a slowdown in advanced-node investment, or weaker order visibility.
  • Advantest (6857)
    A test equipment company affected by demand for AI chips, memory, and non-memory testing.
    Strengths
    Rated OW, with the report separately highlighting order and sales trends, tester market share, and business expansion.
    Weaknesses
    Earnings are sensitive to semiconductor testing demand and the shipment pace of high-end chips.
    Comparison
    Compared with materials companies, Advantest has more direct exposure to semiconductor equipment and testing capex.
    Risks
    AI chip shipments falling short of expectations, delayed customer investment pace, or margin/share pressure from competition.
  • KIOXIA Holdings (285A)
    A NAND memory company affected by NAND supply-demand, bit shipments, ASPs, and wafer output.
    Strengths
    Rated OW, with the valuation table showing upside to target price and the report tracking NAND market share and pricing trends.
    Weaknesses
    Memory pricing is highly cyclical, leading to large earnings volatility.
    Comparison
    Compared with equipment and materials names, KIOXIA has greater direct exposure to the memory price cycle.
    Risks
    A decline in NAND prices, overly rapid supply expansion, or weaker-than-expected end demand.
  • JX Advanced Metals (5016)
    A semiconductor technical materials supplier, with the report focusing on sputtering targets and Cu target market share.
    Strengths
    Rated OW, with demand for high-end materials linked to advanced nodes and semiconductor supply-chain upgrades.
    Weaknesses
    Material pricing, capacity expansion, and customer qualification cycles may affect earnings realization.
    Comparison
    It shares the technical materials exposure with Nittobo, HOYA, and AGC, but its product and customer mix differ.
    Risks
    Slower customer expansion, material price volatility, and intensifying share competition.
  • AGC (5201)
    A glass and strategic-business company with exposure to EUV mask blanks and flat-glass cost structure, among others.
    Strengths
    Diversified exposure across semiconductor materials and traditional glass businesses.
    Weaknesses
    Rated N, with some legacy businesses affected by energy, raw material, and price cycles.
    Comparison
    Compared with pure semiconductor equipment names, AGC's semiconductor leverage may be diluted by its traditional materials businesses.
    Risks
    Energy prices, natural gas, coal, glass prices, and demand volatility.

Key data

  • Report date2026-06-22The file name and disclosure page indicate that this report is a June 2026 publication, with stock prices mostly based on the June 19, 2026 close.
  • Number of covered companies18The disclosure page lists AGC, Advantest, Disco, HOYA, JX Advanced Metals, KIOXIA Holdings, Kaneka, Lasertec, Nikon, Nippon Electric Glass, Nippon Sheet Glass, Nittobo, Rigaku Holdings, SCREEN Holdings, Sumitomo Osaka Cement, Taiheiyo Cement, Tokyo Electron, and ULVAC.
  • Tokyo Electron8035.T / ¥75,360 / OW / target price ¥85,000The valuation table shows it as an important Overweight name among Japanese semiconductor-related companies.
  • Advantest6857.T / ¥31,740 / OW / target price ¥41,000The report separately presents charts on order and sales trends, tester market share, and business expansion.
  • KIOXIA Holdings285A.T / ¥108,600 / OW / target price ¥155,000The report includes charts on NAND market share, bit shipments, and ASP trends.
  • JX Advanced Metals5016.T / ¥4,747 / OW / target price ¥5,700A key company in the technical materials segment, with focus on semiconductor sputtering targets and the Cu target market share.
  • Nittobo3110.T / ¥19,500 / OW / target price ¥29,000The report tracks NE/NER glass, T glass capacity, sales, and ASP trends.
  • Key industry variablesCoWoS, AI servers, DRAM, NAND, SPE, CSP capexThese sections form the main basis for industry assumptions and company earnings sensitivity.

Impact & implications

For investors, the report suggests that Japanese semiconductor equipment and materials companies remain important exposed assets to AI servers, advanced packaging, memory recovery, and foundry capex. However, because valuations, order cycles, and end-demand exposure differ materially across stocks, portfolio allocation should distinguish between equipment leaders, test equipment, high-end materials, glass materials, and cyclical industrial materials in terms of risk-reward profile.

Risks

  • AI server shipments or CSP capex coming in below expectations, weakening demand related to CoWoS, test equipment, and advanced-node investment.
  • Less-than-expected improvement in DRAM and NAND supply-demand, causing memory prices and equipment investment to soften.
  • Semiconductor equipment orders and SPE sales are cyclical, and a decline in backlog could compress valuations.
  • Some Japanese semiconductor equipment and materials companies trade at elevated valuations, making them sensitive to earnings realization and target-price assumptions.
  • Energy, raw material, FX, and industrial materials price swings may affect the margins of glass, cement, and materials companies.
  • J.P. Morgan discloses market-making, client, investment-banking, or holdings relationships with several covered companies, so investors should read the conflict disclosures alongside the report.

What to watch

  • The pace of CoWoS capacity expansion at TSMC and non-TSMC suppliers.
  • The direction of revisions to J.P. Morgan's AI server shipment forecasts.
  • Whether the CSP capex outlook continues to be revised upward.
  • Global DRAM supply-demand, DDR5 penetration, and process migration.
  • NAND bit shipments, ASPs, wafer output, and lithography structure changes.
  • Order and sales trends at Advantest, Disco, Tokyo Electron, SCREEN HD, ULVAC, and Tokyo Seimitsu.
  • Order changes at ASML and Lasertec.
  • Capacity and pricing trends for key materials such as EUV mask blanks, semiconductor support glass, and sputtering targets.
Zhejiang ICP No. 2022035445-5
Disclaimer: Market data, charts, indicators, research views, and other information provided on this website are intended solely for information display, research communication, and educational reference. They should not be regarded as personalized investment advice, securities recommendations, trading instructions, solicitations, or guarantees of return. While we strive to improve the reliability of our data and content, such information may still be subject to delays, errors, incompleteness, or untimely updates due to source differences, methodological limitations, system processing, or market volatility. Users should exercise independent judgment based on their own circumstances and bear all risks and responsibilities arising from the use of this website.

Settings

Sign in to view recent logins