Quick Summary
Covering the latest research from top Wall Street investment banks

In-depth semiconductor research for future AI infrastructure: parallel expansion in GPU, ASIC, optical chips, and China chips

Institution
Morgan Stanley
Date
2026-05-08
Authors
Charlie Chan, Daniel Yen, CFA, Daisy Dai, CFA, Tiffany Yeh, Henry Zhao, Lucas Wang, Ethan Jia
Company
-
Ticker
-
Industry
Semiconductors
Rating
Asia Pacific Industry View Attractive
BullishLow confidenceThe report argues that cloud AI capex, AI servers, advanced packaging, HBM, custom ASICs, and demand for China AI GPUs will jointly drive semiconductor industry expansion, while flagging budget, energy, capacity, and regulatory constraints.
AuthorsCharlie Chan, Daniel Yen, CFA, Daisy Dai, CFA, Tiffany Yeh, Henry Zhao, Lucas Wang, Ethan Jia
CoverageChina、Asia-Pacific
Asset classesEquity
Business segmentsAI semiconductors、CPU、GPU、ASIC、Optical chips、Foundry、Advanced packaging、HBM、Back-end equipment、Test equipment and consumables、China AI GPU、SiC and GaN power semiconductors
Research firm divisions/subsidiariesMorgan Stanley(Other)

AI summary card

In-depth semiconductor research for future AI infrastructure: parallel expansion in GPU, ASIC, optical chips, and China chips

Morgan Stanley believes AI infrastructure is driving the semiconductor industry into a new growth cycle, with the main beneficiaries including the NVIDIA ecosystem, TSMC advanced packaging, HBM, ASICs, test consumables, CPO, and China’s domestic AI GPU supply chain.

Industry view Attractive; top ideas include MediaTek, TSMC, SMIC, Aspeed, Alchip, GUC, KYEC, ASE, FOCI, ASMPT, AIRing, Macronix, AP Memory, GigaDevice, Iluvatar, Cambricon, NAURA Tech, AMEC, USI, Winway, MPI, Hon Precision, Gudeng, and others.
SemiconductorsArtificial IntelligenceData CentersAI GPUASICCPOHBMAdvanced PackagingChina Chips
  • Global AI semiconductor revenue is expected to maintain strong growth from 2023-2030e, with the chart showing a 2023-30e CAGR of 38%.
  • The bull-case scenario based on supply-and-demand data suggests that 2025e cloud AI Semi TAM could reach US$235bn, cloud capex about US$400bn, and AI server capex about US$300bn.
  • TSMC CoWoS and SoIC capacity is believed to have expanded materially in 2025 and may continue to increase in 2026-2027 to meet AI demand.
  • Even with NVIDIA providing powerful AI GPUs, CSPs still need to develop custom chips in-house, and Trainium, TPU, and more ASIC projects are important leads.
  • China AI GPU demand is being driven by lower inference costs from DeepSeek, improving domestic foundry capabilities, and expansion of advanced-node capacity; the report expects China AI GPU TAM to increase to US$67bn by 2030e.

Report interpretation

Overview

This report is Morgan Stanley’s deep research on the semiconductor industry in Greater China, centered on CPU, GPU, ASIC, optical chips, and China chips for future AI infrastructure. From cloud capex, AI servers, AI semiconductors, advanced packaging, HBM, CPO, test equipment, power semiconductors, and China AI GPU supply chains, the report analyzes how AI infrastructure expansion drives the semiconductor value chain.

Core views

The core view is that AI remains the strongest structural driver for semiconductors. Cloud capex remains robust, and the AI server and AI semiconductor markets continue to expand; while NVIDIA GPUs remain dominant, cloud companies’ in-house ASICs and non-NVIDIA GPUs will also become important incremental contributors. Advanced packaging, CoWoS/SoIC, HBM, CPO, and test consumables benefit from rising packaging complexity. In China, low-cost inference demand driven by DeepSeek, improving domestic supply chain capabilities, and expanding advanced-node capacity are expected to support growth in the local AI GPU market.

Analysis framework

The report uses an industry-chain, data-driven framework: top-down estimation of cloud capex, AI server capex, and AI semiconductor TAM, then bottom-up tracking of TSMC advanced packaging capacity, NVIDIA GB200/300 rack supply-demand, HBM Gb consumption, wafer demand, CSP custom ASIC projects, China advanced-node capacity, and the competitive landscape of domestic AI GPU vendors.

Methodology notes

  • Market sizingLayered TAM and capex decomposition

    Break down sequentially from Cloud Capex to AI Server Capex to AI Semi TAM

    The chart shows estimated 2025e cloud capex of about US$400bn, AI server capex of about US$300bn, and AI Semi of about US$235bn, of which cloud AI ASICs and non-NVIDIA GPUs are about US$30bn.

  • Supply chain trackingAdvanced packaging and wafer demand tracking

    CoWoS/SoIC, leading-edge wafers, HBM, and rack supply-demand

    By tracking TSMC CoWoS capacity, NVIDIA GB200/300 racks, HBM Gb consumption, and leading-edge wafer demand, the report gauges the constraints on upstream manufacturing and packaging resources from AI infrastructure expansion.

  • Competitive landscapeGPU and ASIC substitution/complementarity analysis

    Custom ASIC vs. AI GPU

    The report argues that powerful NVIDIA AI GPUs do not eliminate CSPs’ need for in-house chips; cost, workload optimization, and supply-chain security still drive Trainium, TPU, and more ASIC projects.

  • Localization analysisMapping China AI GPU and advanced-node capacity

    Domestic demand, capacity, and vendor landscape

    The report combines DeepSeek-driven inference demand, China’s advanced-node capacity expansion, domestic foundry capabilities, and comparisons among Cambricon, MetaX, and Iluvatar to assess the growth potential of China AI GPUs.

Asset mapping & comparison

Structured mapping from thesis to named assets (strengths, weaknesses, peers, risks).

  • AI semiconductor supply chain
    Core beneficiary asset group
    Strengths
    Driven by cloud capex, AI servers, GPUs, ASICs, and HBM demand, with market size expected to expand rapidly.
    Weaknesses
    Technology inflation raises wafer, OSAT, and memory costs, which may compress margins for chip designers.
    Comparison
    Compared with non-AI semiconductors, AI semiconductors have higher priority in supply-chain resource allocation.
    Risks
    Budget constraints, energy limits, capacity bottlenecks, regulation, and export controls.
  • TSMC and advanced packaging
    Key manufacturing and packaging segment for AI GPU and ASIC expansion
    Strengths
    CoWoS/SoIC capacity expansion directly benefits from demand for NVIDIA and CSP AI chips.
    Weaknesses
    Capacity build-out takes a long time, and demand volatility may create capex efficiency risk.
    Comparison
    Advanced packaging is closer to the AI compute bottleneck than traditional process nodes.
    Risks
    Uncertainty around equipment, materials, yields, power, and customer demand timing.
  • NVIDIA ecosystem
    Main contributor to AI Semi TAM
    Strengths
    AI GPUs remain dominant in training and inference infrastructure, and GB200/300 rack supply-demand is a key tracking indicator.
    Weaknesses
    High costs and supply constraints push CSPs to keep developing in-house ASICs and non-NVIDIA GPUs.
    Comparison
    GPUs are more general-purpose, while ASICs may offer cost and energy-efficiency advantages for specific workloads.
    Risks
    Customer in-house substitution, export controls, and supply-chain bottlenecks.
  • CSP in-house ASICs
    An incremental substitute and complement for AI infrastructure
    Strengths
    Can be optimized for internal workloads in terms of cost, energy efficiency, and supply security; Trainium and TPU forecasts are tracked separately.
    Weaknesses
    Long development cycles and high software/ecosystem adaptation difficulty.
    Comparison
    Compared with NVIDIA GPUs, ASICs rely more on a single customer scale and specific use cases.
    Risks
    Project delays, performance shortfalls, and forecast errors.
  • China AI GPUs and domestic semiconductors
    A beneficiary direction for localization substitution and domestic AI inference demand
    Strengths
    DeepSeek is driving low-cost inference demand, domestic foundry supply-chain capabilities are improving, and vendors such as Cambricon, MetaX, and Iluvatar are drawing attention.
    Weaknesses
    Advanced nodes, software ecosystems, and high-end manufacturing capabilities remain constrained.
    Comparison
    Compared with global leading GPUs, China’s supply chain is narrowing the perceived technology gap through multi-chip packaging, cluster expansion, and manufacturing capacity growth.
    Risks
    Export controls, restrictions related to U.S. Executive Orders, insufficient advanced-node capacity, and regulatory uncertainty.

Key data

  • 2025e cloud AI Semi TAM bull-case assumptionUS$235bnBull-case scenario assumption driven by supply-chain data, mainly contributed by NVIDIA AI GPUs.
  • 2025e cloud capexUS$400bnOuter-layer Cloud Capex estimate in the chart.
  • 2025e AI server capexUS$300bnAI Server Capex estimate in the chart.
  • Cloud AI ASICs and non-NVIDIA GPUsabout US$30bnShown in the chart as a subset within AI Semi.
  • AI semiconductor revenue growth2023-30e CAGR 38%Chart label for AI semi revenue breakdown by application.
  • Potential TSMC CoWoS capacityMay reach 165kwpm in 2027The report heading indicates TSMC may expand CoWoS capacity further as AI demand remains strong.
  • China AI GPU TAMUS$67bn by 2030eThe report heading shows Morgan Stanley expects China AI GPU TAM to grow to US$67bn by 2030e.
  • AI accelerator revenue supported by China advanced-node capacityUS$58bn in 2030The report body title mentions that China advanced-node capacity may support US$58bn of AI accelerator revenue in 2030.

Impact & implications

For investors, AI infrastructure expansion benefits not only GPUs and leading foundries, but also advanced packaging, HBM, back-end equipment, test consumables, CPO, power semiconductors, and domestic AI GPUs. Bottlenecks extend from a single compute chip to packaging capacity, memory bandwidth, rack power delivery, test time, and regional regulation, so companies with scarce capacity, complex packaging capabilities, or local substitution positions are more likely to see valuation and earnings upside.

Risks

  • Technology inflation raises wafer, OSAT, and memory costs, compressing chip designers’ margins.
  • AI may crowd out some non-AI demand, and the supply chain may prioritize resources for AI semiconductors.
  • Growth constraints include budgets, U.S. energy limits, China chip capacity constraints, and regulation.
  • DDR4 shortages may continue into 2H26, but spot price upside may be limited.
  • China-related entities and securities may be affected by U.S. executive orders, export controls, and investment restrictions; investors should confirm compliance on their own.

What to watch

  • Whether major CSP cloud capex remains strong.
  • TSMC CoWoS/SoIC expansion pace and 2026-2027 capacity utilization.
  • NVIDIA GB200/300 rack supply-demand, shipments, and supply-share changes.
  • HBM consumption and memory price trends, especially 2026e HBM Gb demand.
  • Progress on Trainium, TPU, and other CSP ASIC projects.
  • China AI GPU demand, advanced-node capacity expansion, and product progress from Cambricon, MetaX, Iluvatar, and others.
  • Order upside for CPO, test equipment, and test consumables from increased AI packaging complexity.
Zhejiang ICP No. 2022035445-5
Disclaimer: Market data, charts, indicators, research views, and other information provided on this website are intended solely for information display, research communication, and educational reference. They should not be regarded as personalized investment advice, securities recommendations, trading instructions, solicitations, or guarantees of return. While we strive to improve the reliability of our data and content, such information may still be subject to delays, errors, incompleteness, or untimely updates due to source differences, methodological limitations, system processing, or market volatility. Users should exercise independent judgment based on their own circumstances and bear all risks and responsibilities arising from the use of this website.

Settings

Sign in to view recent logins