In-depth semiconductor research for future AI infrastructure: parallel expansion in GPU, ASIC, optical chips, and China chips
AI summary card
In-depth semiconductor research for future AI infrastructure: parallel expansion in GPU, ASIC, optical chips, and China chips
Morgan Stanley believes AI infrastructure is driving the semiconductor industry into a new growth cycle, with the main beneficiaries including the NVIDIA ecosystem, TSMC advanced packaging, HBM, ASICs, test consumables, CPO, and China’s domestic AI GPU supply chain.
- Global AI semiconductor revenue is expected to maintain strong growth from 2023-2030e, with the chart showing a 2023-30e CAGR of 38%.
- The bull-case scenario based on supply-and-demand data suggests that 2025e cloud AI Semi TAM could reach US$235bn, cloud capex about US$400bn, and AI server capex about US$300bn.
- TSMC CoWoS and SoIC capacity is believed to have expanded materially in 2025 and may continue to increase in 2026-2027 to meet AI demand.
- Even with NVIDIA providing powerful AI GPUs, CSPs still need to develop custom chips in-house, and Trainium, TPU, and more ASIC projects are important leads.
- China AI GPU demand is being driven by lower inference costs from DeepSeek, improving domestic foundry capabilities, and expansion of advanced-node capacity; the report expects China AI GPU TAM to increase to US$67bn by 2030e.
Report interpretation
Overview
This report is Morgan Stanley’s deep research on the semiconductor industry in Greater China, centered on CPU, GPU, ASIC, optical chips, and China chips for future AI infrastructure. From cloud capex, AI servers, AI semiconductors, advanced packaging, HBM, CPO, test equipment, power semiconductors, and China AI GPU supply chains, the report analyzes how AI infrastructure expansion drives the semiconductor value chain.
Core views
The core view is that AI remains the strongest structural driver for semiconductors. Cloud capex remains robust, and the AI server and AI semiconductor markets continue to expand; while NVIDIA GPUs remain dominant, cloud companies’ in-house ASICs and non-NVIDIA GPUs will also become important incremental contributors. Advanced packaging, CoWoS/SoIC, HBM, CPO, and test consumables benefit from rising packaging complexity. In China, low-cost inference demand driven by DeepSeek, improving domestic supply chain capabilities, and expanding advanced-node capacity are expected to support growth in the local AI GPU market.
Analysis framework
The report uses an industry-chain, data-driven framework: top-down estimation of cloud capex, AI server capex, and AI semiconductor TAM, then bottom-up tracking of TSMC advanced packaging capacity, NVIDIA GB200/300 rack supply-demand, HBM Gb consumption, wafer demand, CSP custom ASIC projects, China advanced-node capacity, and the competitive landscape of domestic AI GPU vendors.
Methodology notes
Break down sequentially from Cloud Capex to AI Server Capex to AI Semi TAM
The chart shows estimated 2025e cloud capex of about US$400bn, AI server capex of about US$300bn, and AI Semi of about US$235bn, of which cloud AI ASICs and non-NVIDIA GPUs are about US$30bn.
CoWoS/SoIC, leading-edge wafers, HBM, and rack supply-demand
By tracking TSMC CoWoS capacity, NVIDIA GB200/300 racks, HBM Gb consumption, and leading-edge wafer demand, the report gauges the constraints on upstream manufacturing and packaging resources from AI infrastructure expansion.
Custom ASIC vs. AI GPU
The report argues that powerful NVIDIA AI GPUs do not eliminate CSPs’ need for in-house chips; cost, workload optimization, and supply-chain security still drive Trainium, TPU, and more ASIC projects.
Domestic demand, capacity, and vendor landscape
The report combines DeepSeek-driven inference demand, China’s advanced-node capacity expansion, domestic foundry capabilities, and comparisons among Cambricon, MetaX, and Iluvatar to assess the growth potential of China AI GPUs.
Asset mapping & comparison
Structured mapping from thesis to named assets (strengths, weaknesses, peers, risks).
- AI semiconductor supply chainCore beneficiary asset group
- Strengths
- Driven by cloud capex, AI servers, GPUs, ASICs, and HBM demand, with market size expected to expand rapidly.
- Weaknesses
- Technology inflation raises wafer, OSAT, and memory costs, which may compress margins for chip designers.
- Comparison
- Compared with non-AI semiconductors, AI semiconductors have higher priority in supply-chain resource allocation.
- Risks
- Budget constraints, energy limits, capacity bottlenecks, regulation, and export controls.
- TSMC and advanced packagingKey manufacturing and packaging segment for AI GPU and ASIC expansion
- Strengths
- CoWoS/SoIC capacity expansion directly benefits from demand for NVIDIA and CSP AI chips.
- Weaknesses
- Capacity build-out takes a long time, and demand volatility may create capex efficiency risk.
- Comparison
- Advanced packaging is closer to the AI compute bottleneck than traditional process nodes.
- Risks
- Uncertainty around equipment, materials, yields, power, and customer demand timing.
- NVIDIA ecosystemMain contributor to AI Semi TAM
- Strengths
- AI GPUs remain dominant in training and inference infrastructure, and GB200/300 rack supply-demand is a key tracking indicator.
- Weaknesses
- High costs and supply constraints push CSPs to keep developing in-house ASICs and non-NVIDIA GPUs.
- Comparison
- GPUs are more general-purpose, while ASICs may offer cost and energy-efficiency advantages for specific workloads.
- Risks
- Customer in-house substitution, export controls, and supply-chain bottlenecks.
- CSP in-house ASICsAn incremental substitute and complement for AI infrastructure
- Strengths
- Can be optimized for internal workloads in terms of cost, energy efficiency, and supply security; Trainium and TPU forecasts are tracked separately.
- Weaknesses
- Long development cycles and high software/ecosystem adaptation difficulty.
- Comparison
- Compared with NVIDIA GPUs, ASICs rely more on a single customer scale and specific use cases.
- Risks
- Project delays, performance shortfalls, and forecast errors.
- China AI GPUs and domestic semiconductorsA beneficiary direction for localization substitution and domestic AI inference demand
- Strengths
- DeepSeek is driving low-cost inference demand, domestic foundry supply-chain capabilities are improving, and vendors such as Cambricon, MetaX, and Iluvatar are drawing attention.
- Weaknesses
- Advanced nodes, software ecosystems, and high-end manufacturing capabilities remain constrained.
- Comparison
- Compared with global leading GPUs, China’s supply chain is narrowing the perceived technology gap through multi-chip packaging, cluster expansion, and manufacturing capacity growth.
- Risks
- Export controls, restrictions related to U.S. Executive Orders, insufficient advanced-node capacity, and regulatory uncertainty.
Key data
- 2025e cloud AI Semi TAM bull-case assumptionUS$235bnBull-case scenario assumption driven by supply-chain data, mainly contributed by NVIDIA AI GPUs.
- 2025e cloud capexUS$400bnOuter-layer Cloud Capex estimate in the chart.
- 2025e AI server capexUS$300bnAI Server Capex estimate in the chart.
- Cloud AI ASICs and non-NVIDIA GPUsabout US$30bnShown in the chart as a subset within AI Semi.
- AI semiconductor revenue growth2023-30e CAGR 38%Chart label for AI semi revenue breakdown by application.
- Potential TSMC CoWoS capacityMay reach 165kwpm in 2027The report heading indicates TSMC may expand CoWoS capacity further as AI demand remains strong.
- China AI GPU TAMUS$67bn by 2030eThe report heading shows Morgan Stanley expects China AI GPU TAM to grow to US$67bn by 2030e.
- AI accelerator revenue supported by China advanced-node capacityUS$58bn in 2030The report body title mentions that China advanced-node capacity may support US$58bn of AI accelerator revenue in 2030.
Impact & implications
For investors, AI infrastructure expansion benefits not only GPUs and leading foundries, but also advanced packaging, HBM, back-end equipment, test consumables, CPO, power semiconductors, and domestic AI GPUs. Bottlenecks extend from a single compute chip to packaging capacity, memory bandwidth, rack power delivery, test time, and regional regulation, so companies with scarce capacity, complex packaging capabilities, or local substitution positions are more likely to see valuation and earnings upside.
Risks
- Technology inflation raises wafer, OSAT, and memory costs, compressing chip designers’ margins.
- AI may crowd out some non-AI demand, and the supply chain may prioritize resources for AI semiconductors.
- Growth constraints include budgets, U.S. energy limits, China chip capacity constraints, and regulation.
- DDR4 shortages may continue into 2H26, but spot price upside may be limited.
- China-related entities and securities may be affected by U.S. executive orders, export controls, and investment restrictions; investors should confirm compliance on their own.
What to watch
- Whether major CSP cloud capex remains strong.
- TSMC CoWoS/SoIC expansion pace and 2026-2027 capacity utilization.
- NVIDIA GB200/300 rack supply-demand, shipments, and supply-share changes.
- HBM consumption and memory price trends, especially 2026e HBM Gb demand.
- Progress on Trainium, TPU, and other CSP ASIC projects.
- China AI GPU demand, advanced-node capacity expansion, and product progress from Cambricon, MetaX, Iluvatar, and others.
- Order upside for CPO, test equipment, and test consumables from increased AI packaging complexity.