Quick Summary
Covering the latest research from top Wall Street investment banks

Intel 1Q26: AI inference drives server CPU upside, but PC and advanced process competition remain constraints

Institution
JPMorgan
Date
2026-04-24
Authors
Subham Singhania, Albert Hung, Jennifer Hsieh, Anthony Leng, David Chou, Jason Chen, Harlan Su
Company
INTEL CORP
Ticker
INTC.US
Industry
Semiconductors
Rating
UW
NeutralLow confidenceIntel 1Q26 DCAI and foundry commentary showed stronger-than-expected AI-inference server CPU demand and process progress, but the report still lists Intel as UW and highlights PC weakness, supply constraints, and TSMC's sustained leading-edge advantage.
AuthorsSubham Singhania, Albert Hung, Jennifer Hsieh, Anthony Leng, David Chou, Jason Chen, Harlan Su
CoverageAsia-Pacific
Asset classesEquity
Business segmentsDCAI、CCG、Intel Foundry、Custom Silicon/ASIC、Advanced Packaging
Research firm divisions/subsidiariesJPMorgan(Other)、J.P. Morgan Securities (Asia Pacific) Limited(Other)、J.P. Morgan India Private Limited(Other)、J.P. Morgan Securities (Taiwan) Limited(Other)

AI summary card

Intel 1Q26: AI inference drives server CPU upside, but PC and advanced process competition remain constraints

JPMorgan believes Intel's 1Q26 DCAI, foundry, and ASIC businesses sent positive signals, but maintains an UW rating on Intel because weaker PC demand, supply bottlenecks, and TSMC's technology leadership still limit re-rating potential.

Intel: UW; current price $66.78 as of 2026-04-23; the report does not provide a target price.
SemiconductorsIntelAI inferenceServer CPUPC demandAdvanced processWafer foundryAdvanced packaging
  • DCAI revenue grew 7% QoQ and 22% YoY in 1Q26, beating both market and management expectations, and management guided for double-digit QoQ DCAI revenue growth in 2Q26.
  • AI inference is driving server CPUs into a multi-year upcycle; CPU:GPU demand is about 1:8 in training workloads and about 1:4 in inference workloads, while agentic AI could further evolve toward more balanced CPU configurations or even CPU-led configurations.
  • PC business performed better than expected in 1Q26, but management expects FY26 PC unit TAM to decline by low double digits YoY, and the report judges that 2H26 demand could be weaker than seasonal patterns.
  • Intel 18A yield is improving, and the target for 14A 0.9 PDK is end-2026, but JPMorgan still believes TSMC leads by several years in advanced processes and expects it to maintain more than 95% share of the leading-edge process market.
  • Intel raised equipment spending within its capex mix, with tool spending expected to grow about 25% YoY, benefiting SPE/WFE suppliers such as Tokyo Electron and Lasertec.

Report interpretation

Overview

This report summarizes the key information from Intel's first-quarter 2026 earnings call and evaluates the implications for servers, PCs, wafer foundry, ASICs, advanced packaging, and the semiconductor equipment chain from the perspective of the Asian technology supply chain. The core judgment of the report is that AI inference demand is pushing server CPUs into a multi-year upcycle, with improving signals in Intel DCAI and parts of its foundry/ASIC businesses; however, PC demand in 2H26 may be weaker than seasonal patterns, supply constraints in CPUs and memory limit short-term shipment realization, and TSMC's leading position in advanced processes and the CoWoS ecosystem has not been materially shaken.

Core views

JPMorgan believes the most positive signal in Intel 1Q26 came from DCAI: revenue grew 7% QoQ and 22% YoY, beating expectations against seasonality. AI inference and agentic AI are lifting general-purpose server compute demand, supporting an acceleration in server CPU TAM over the next several years. On PCs, 1Q26 CCG revenue fell 6% QoQ but rose 1% YoY, supported by pull-ins and better product mix, but FY26 PC unit TAM is expected to decline by low double digits YoY, so 2H26 may weaken. On foundry, progress in 18A and 14A improved, but the report still believes Intel 18A is roughly comparable to TSMC N3E and 14A corresponds to TSMC N2, while TSMC's advantages in technology and customer programs remain intact. In advanced packaging, Intel has a growing customer backlog and plans to expand backend capacity in Malaysia, but EMIB's near-term competitiveness versus TSMC CoWoS and OSAT full-process solutions remains limited.

Analysis framework

The report uses a combination of earnings-call takeaways, management guidance interpretation, supply-demand gap estimation, and supply-chain mapping to link changes in Intel's various business lines to Asian semiconductor, server, PC, equipment, and materials companies. The analysis focuses on DCAI revenue and server CPU TAM, CCG and PC unit demand, the relative competitiveness of 18A/14A versus TSMC N3E/N2, N3/N2 capacity gaps, changes in equipment spending within capex, and the potential substitution effects of ASICs and advanced packaging on existing supply chains.

Methodology notes

  • earnings_reviewBusiness-line segmented earnings interpretation

    Break down revenue, guidance, and supply-chain impact by DCAI, CCG, Intel Foundry, ASIC, and advanced packaging.

    Rather than simply restating Intel's results, the report converts the growth, supply-demand dynamics, process progress, and capex changes of each business line into investment implications for Asian technology supply-chain companies.

  • supply_demand_analysisCapacity gap and shipment constraint analysis

    Use constraints in CPU, memory, advanced-process wafer, and packaging capacity to explain the gap between demand and actual shipments.

    The report estimates potential CSP demand growth at 60%-80%, but due to CPU and memory constraints, assumes only 15%-20% and 20%-30% growth in server rack and motherboard shipments, respectively.

  • technology_comparisonRelative competitiveness comparison of advanced processes

    Compare Intel 18A/14A with TSMC N3E/N2 to assess the foundry competitive landscape.

    The report believes Intel 18A is roughly equivalent to TSMC N3E and 14A corresponds to TSMC N2; therefore, even if Intel sees more customer engagement, TSMC is still expected to maintain more than 95% share in leading-edge processes.

Asset mapping & comparison

Structured mapping from thesis to named assets (strengths, weaknesses, peers, risks).

  • Intel (INTC.US)
    Research subject, rated UW
    Strengths
    DCAI delivered better-than-expected growth, with AI inference driving server CPU TAM upward; progress in 18A/14A improved; ASIC and advanced packaging businesses offer mid- to long-term growth potential.
    Weaknesses
    PC demand in 2H26 may be weaker than seasonal patterns; CPU and memory supply limit short-term shipments; advanced processes still trail TSMC by several years.
    Comparison
    The report believes 18A is roughly equivalent to TSMC N3E and 14A corresponds to TSMC N2; TSMC can still maintain more than 95% share in leading-edge processes.
    Risks
    Persistent supply bottlenecks, declining PC demand, slow foundry customer conversion, and advanced packaging mass-production progress falling short of expectations.
  • TSMC (2330.TW)
    Primary benchmark for foundry competition and capacity tightness
    Strengths
    Clear advantages in leading-edge process technology and customer programs, strong N3/N2 demand, and leading-edge process share expected to stay above 95%.
    Weaknesses
    N3 capacity is extremely tight, with a 2026 supply-demand gap of about 500K-600K wafers.
    Comparison
    Intel 18A/14A progress has improved, but it still has not changed TSMC's leading position in the N3E/N2 generations.
    Risks
    Customers may turn to Intel or Samsung for supplemental capacity to diversify geography and supply.
  • ASPEED, Lotes, Wiwynn, EMC, Tripod
    Beneficiary supply chain of the server CPU upcycle
    Strengths
    Stronger server shipments, core-count-driven ASP expansion, and higher dense-server penetration could increase content value per machine.
    Weaknesses
    Short-term actual shipments are constrained by CPU and memory supply.
    Comparison
    Compared with the PC chain, the server chain has a stronger demand trend.
    Risks
    If component constraints persist, revenue recognition may be delayed into the following year.
  • Micro-Star and ASUSTek
    Names to avoid under weakening PC demand
    Strengths
    Better-than-expected PC demand in 1H26 had provided short-term support.
    Weaknesses
    2H26 may be weaker than seasonal patterns, while cost inflation in memory, CPU, analog, passive components, and PCB squeezes OEM margins.
    Comparison
    The report lists Micro-Star and ASUSTek as top avoids in the PC space.
    Risks
    If price hikes weaken end demand, both unit shipments and margins could come under pressure.
  • Tokyo Electron and Lasertec
    Beneficiaries of capex mix shifting toward tool spending
    Strengths
    Intel tool spending is expected to grow about 25% YoY, raising WFE's share of capex.
    Weaknesses
    Equipment demand still depends on Intel's capacity expansion pace and progress at advanced nodes.
    Comparison
    Compared with declining space-related spending, tool-related spending benefits more directly.
    Risks
    If Intel's demand gap narrows or capacity expansion is delayed, equipment order realization could be affected.
  • Alchip, GUC, MediaTek, Marvell, Broadcom
    Potential competitors to Intel in large AI ASICs
    Strengths
    They still retain existing ASIC design-service capabilities and customer bases.
    Weaknesses
    If Intel makes substantial progress in large AI ASIC engagements, it could pose a competitive threat.
    Comparison
    The report believes Intel's current ASIC mix is more focused on small, specialized edge AI accelerators, with no signs yet of full-scale large AI accelerator programs.
    Risks
    Intel could leverage its internal IP and data-center chip experience to enter larger-scale ASIC projects.
  • CoWoS and OSAT full-process solutions
    Benchmark for advanced packaging competition
    Strengths
    TSMC CoWoS is expanding to 14x reticle size and larger, while OSAT full-process solutions have more mature mass-production experience.
    Weaknesses
    Current supply is very tight, prompting customers to evaluate alternatives.
    Comparison
    Intel EMIB is being evaluated by some AI ASIC projects, but its large-scale accelerator mass-production record is limited, and EMIB mass production is expected around 2028.
    Risks
    If EMIB technology and capacity mature rapidly, it could become a complementary competitive option to CoWoS/OSAT.

Key data

  • Intel DCAI 1Q26 revenue+7% QoQ / +22% YoYBetter than both market and management expectations, and counter to typical seasonality.
  • 2Q26 DCAI guidanceDouble-digit QoQ growthManagement expects continued demand, pricing actions, and supply improvements to support growth.
  • Intel CCG 1Q26 revenue-6% QoQ / +1% YoYSupported by pull-ins and better product mix, and better than market expectations.
  • FY26 PC unit TAMLow double-digit YoY declineBased on this, the report judges that PC demand in 2H26 may be weaker than seasonal patterns.
  • Potential CSP demand growth60%-80%But CPU and memory supply constraints limit actual downstream shipments.
  • Assumed growth in server rack shipments15%-20%Below potential demand, mainly due to component supply constraints.
  • Assumed growth in server motherboard shipments20%-30%There is room for upward revision if CPU/memory supply improves.
  • Intel Foundry 1Q26 revenue$5.4bn, +20% QoQDriven by a higher mix of Intel 3 EUV wafers and increased 18A output.
  • Panther Lake 2Q26 production volumeAbout 6-7x QoQ growthIntel expects 18A to reach year-end yield targets by mid-year.
  • Judgment on TSMC leading-edge process share95%+JPMorgan expects TSMC to maintain dominance in leading-edge processes for the foreseeable future.
  • TSMC N3 2026 supply-demand gapAbout 500K-600K wafers, or $12bn-18bn revenue potentialReflects tight advanced-process capacity driven by AI accelerator demand.
  • Intel 2026 capex guidanceFlat YoYPreviously flat to down; structurally, space-related spending is down while tool spending is up about 25% YoY.
  • Intel custom silicon businessRun-rate revenue above $1bn, more than 30% QoQ growth in 1Q, and nearly doubled YoYThe current mix is more tilted toward small, specialized edge AI accelerators rather than large XPU projects.
  • Intel Advanced PackagingCustomer backlog is growing, with a more visible contribution in 2027Management mentioned backend capacity expansion in Malaysia and multi-billion-dollar annual revenue opportunities.
  • Intel stock rating and priceUW; $66.78 [23 April 2026]The company discussion list shows Intel as UW; the report does not provide a target price.

Impact & implications

The implications for the supply chain are mixed: AI inference and the server CPU upcycle benefit server-related suppliers such as ASPEED, Lotes, Wiwynn, EMC, and Tripod, as well as equipment companies such as Tokyo Electron and Lasertec supported by higher WFE spending; weaker PC demand and cost inflation are unfavorable for Micro-Star, ASUSTek, PC semiconductor suppliers, and second-tier wafer foundries. For the foundry landscape, increased engagement between Intel and customers such as Tesla and potentially Apple reflects customers seeking geographic and capacity diversification when TSMC is extremely tight, rather than a rapid erosion of TSMC's technological leadership. For advanced packaging, EMIB may be evaluated by some AI ASIC projects, but in the face of large-scale accelerator mass-production records and CoWoS size expansion, its short-term competitiveness remains limited.

Risks

  • Intel PC demand may be weaker than seasonal patterns in 2H26, putting pressure on CCG and the PC supply chain.
  • CPU and memory supply constraints may persist, preventing server rack and motherboard shipments from fully realizing potential demand.
  • Intel 18A/14A yield, performance, or customer ramp progress may come in below management expectations.
  • If TSMC's advanced-process supply tightness eases, customer demand for supplemental capacity from Intel/Samsung may decline.
  • If Intel's ASIC business fails to expand from small edge AI accelerators to large XPU/AI ASIC projects, its mid- to long-term growth narrative may be constrained.
  • There is uncertainty around the mass-production timing, customer projects, and yields of advanced packaging EMIB.
  • PC component cost inflation may squeeze OEM margins or further suppress end demand through price increases.

What to watch

  • Whether 2Q26 DCAI achieves the double-digit QoQ growth guided by management.
  • Whether FY26 server CPU unit TAM maintains a double-digit growth trajectory.
  • Whether improving CPU and memory supply can drive upward revisions to server rack and motherboard shipment assumptions.
  • Intel 18A mid-year yield targets and the ramp progress of Panther Lake 2Q26 production.
  • Whether 14A 0.9 PDK is delivered as planned by end-2026.
  • Whether more concrete signals emerge in 2H26 to early 2027 regarding Intel's foundry partnerships with Tesla, Apple, or other customers.
  • The pace of TSMC N3/N2 capacity expansion and whether the N3 supply-demand gap narrows in 2026.
  • Whether Intel's roughly 25% YoY growth in tool spending translates into orders for SPE/WFE suppliers.
  • Whether Intel custom silicon expands from small edge AI accelerators into large AI ASIC engagements.
  • Advanced Packaging backlog orders, backend capacity in Malaysia, and the EMIB mass-production timeline.
Zhejiang ICP No. 2022035445-5
Disclaimer: Market data, charts, indicators, research views, and other information provided on this website are intended solely for information display, research communication, and educational reference. They should not be regarded as personalized investment advice, securities recommendations, trading instructions, solicitations, or guarantees of return. While we strive to improve the reliability of our data and content, such information may still be subject to delays, errors, incompleteness, or untimely updates due to source differences, methodological limitations, system processing, or market volatility. Users should exercise independent judgment based on their own circumstances and bear all risks and responsibilities arising from the use of this website.

Settings

Sign in to view recent logins